Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Clean Code

Channel

Clean Code

@codeclean

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,039subscribers

-117 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001438683880
TypeChannel
Username@codeclean
Created6 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/codeclean

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,03912,16412,101.56 August 2026 — 12,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,158 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,164 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,161 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,162 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,160 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,158 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,152 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,145 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,144 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,140 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,138 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,136 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,135 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,132 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,127 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,128 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,126 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,123 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,119 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,114 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,111 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,105 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,103 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,101 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,095 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,084 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,077 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,070 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,068 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,061 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,055 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,039 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net -117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,020–12,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:3812,039-16
18 Sept 2026, 21:4012,055-6
16 Sept 2026, 16:4012,061-7
14 Sept 2026, 18:1612,068-2
13 Sept 2026, 07:3712,070-7
11 Sept 2026, 12:3712,077-7
8 Sept 2026, 19:5712,084-11
5 Sept 2026, 14:2112,095-6
3 Sept 2026, 16:5812,101-2
1 Sept 2026, 12:0712,103-2
31 Aug 2026, 09:4312,105-6
30 Aug 2026, 07:2312,111-3
29 Aug 2026, 10:0212,114-5
28 Aug 2026, 07:3412,119-4
27 Aug 2026, 07:5412,123-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:2512,126-2
25 Aug 2026, 06:3312,128+1
24 Aug 2026, 09:2812,127-5
22 Aug 2026, 17:0212,132-3
21 Aug 2026, 06:5212,135first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.40%
avg views ÷ 12,039 subscribers
Avg views / post
409
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held105 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total8,180
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTC212 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

📑 Ответ

  1. AddHandler56%
  2. Attach0%
  3. Register17%
  4. Subscribe28%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTC209 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Clean Code #test #Csharp Выберите правильный вариант 👇🏼

2 Sept 2026, 14:07 UTC258 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Китайская нейросеть, которая заменяет подписку на GPT — бесплатно и оффлайн 2026 год – новая эпоха для DeepSeek. Китайская нейросеть работает прямо на вашем устройстве, обгоняет западные модели и снимает все ограничения: без подписок, без интернета, без контроля. Зерокодер обновил практикум и собрал все, что важно знать о локальных моделях и как с ними работать. ⚡️Что ждет вас на вебинаре? – Покажем, как установит…

2 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC328 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

📑 Ответ

  1. bind()34%
  2. bindParam()48%
  3. bindValue()10%
  4. bindVar()7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC320 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Clean Code #test #PHP Выберите правильный вариант 👇🏼

1 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTC416 viewsread 3 September 2026

Как работает ДВОИЧНЫЙ КОД? (база) Первая часть видео про работу БИТОВ и БАЙТОВ. Разбираем фундаментальную базу для пронимания программирования 📺 YouTube Clean Code

1 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC447 viewsread 3 September 2026

НА ЧЁМ КОДЯТ ХАКЕРЫ? Какие языки программирования нужны для хакинга? Разбор по направлениям + план обучения с нуля. 📺 YouTube Clean Code

1 Sept 2026, 08:07 UTC480 viewsread 3 September 2026

Я написал сайт на Excel и сошёл с ума В этом видео я объясню, как создал свой сайт с нуля на Excel Какие препятствия тебя ждут, и как правильно работать с протоколом HTTP. 📺 YouTube Clean Code

31 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC440 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📖Mastering Object-Oriented Programming in Modern C++ 🖋Ayman Alheraki Эта книга была написана с единственной целью: помочь разработчикам, как начинающим, так и опытным, понять принципы объектно-ориентированного программирования (ООП) и современного C++ в структурированной, практичной и доступной форме. 💾 Скачать книгу Clean Code | #книги #Cpp

31 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC450 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📖Intersection of Machine Learning and Computational Social Sciences 🖋Salah Boutkif В тексте используются вычислительные методы и крупномасштабный анализ данных для изучения сложных социальных явлений и человеческого поведения. В нем рассматриваются различные методологии, в том числе агентное моделирование, сетевой анализ, обработка естественного языка и машинное обучение, которые позволяют получить представление о …

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @codeclean. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 17 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz18 voters

📑 Ответ

  1. AddHandler56%
  2. Attach0%
  3. Register17%
  4. Subscribe28%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz29 voters

📑 Ответ

  1. bind()34%
  2. bindParam()48%
  3. bindValue()10%
  4. bindVar()7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz51 voters

📑 Ответ

  1. IP20%
  2. IPAddr37%
  3. Address10%
  4. NetAddr33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz46 voters

📑 Ответ

  1. get()67%
  2. load()7%
  3. fetch()9%
  4. retrieve()17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz62 voters

📑 Ответ

  1. InputStreamReader32%
  2. BufferedReader13%
  3. FileReader10%
  4. FileInputStream45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz57 voters

📑 Ответ

  1. find()32%
  2. index()51%
  3. locate()5%
  4. pos()12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NOP::Nuances of Programming
@nuancesprog · 56,542
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Типичный программист
@tproger · 78,305
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
BZD • Книги для программистов
@bzd_channel · 36,402
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 1 September 2026
Веб-страница
@tproger_web · 22,429
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Senior Frontend - javascript, html, css
@seniorFront · 23,904
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
IT Юмор
@ithumor · 60,568
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Библиотека программиста
@proglibrary · 78,288
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Библиотека фронтендера | Frontend, JS, JavaScript, React.js, Angular.js, Vue.js
@frontendproglib · 20,930
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 September 2026
FrontEndDev
@front_end_dev · 25,875
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Pythonist.ru - образование по питону
@pythonist_ru · 24,046
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Библиотека джависта | Java, Spring, Maven, Hibernate
@javaproglib · 22,022
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Clean Code” (@codeclean), 12,039 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codeclean.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.