Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -32,897. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 785,830–828,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:57
790,765
-1,676
15 Sept 2026, 18:00
792,441
-1,264
13 Sept 2026, 23:18
793,705
-1,461
12 Sept 2026, 05:17
795,166
-5,854
9 Sept 2026, 23:39
801,020
-2,524
6 Sept 2026, 16:57
803,544
-1,932
4 Sept 2026, 04:19
805,476
-990
2 Sept 2026, 19:16
806,466
-758
1 Sept 2026, 20:16
807,224
-962
31 Aug 2026, 17:06
808,186
-753
30 Aug 2026, 18:55
808,939
-800
29 Aug 2026, 19:14
809,739
-1,036
28 Aug 2026, 17:38
810,775
-823
27 Aug 2026, 20:18
811,598
-954
26 Aug 2026, 21:34
812,552
-995
25 Aug 2026, 22:36
813,547
-1,174
24 Aug 2026, 22:34
814,721
-1,629
23 Aug 2026, 08:13
816,350
-1,353
21 Aug 2026, 20:34
817,703
-1,079
20 Aug 2026, 17:42
818,782
first reading
Engagement
464 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.37%
avg views ÷ 790,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,800
271 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.683%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
271
of 464 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
464 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
2,937,850
Reactions total
20,066
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,370
Videos
≈4,010
Links
≈11,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 37m
Average length
1m 28s
Measured directly from 148 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
4 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
3.0 hours: 11,600 → 6.0 hours: 14,600still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
67 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
47,982 reactions across 461 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15,918
33.2%
😁
10,517
21.9%
🗿
7,266
15.1%
🤯
6,747
14.1%
😢
4,558
9.50%
🤔
2,976
6.20%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 464 of the 464 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,940 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 464 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @techno_media. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 464 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В Minecraft зимой завезут ЛЕДЯНЫЕ пещеры — появится новый зимний биом.
Что нас ждет внутри:
🕤Светящиеся ледяные кристаллы — новые источники света.
🕤Сосульки — если поставить под ними факел, лёд растает и сосулька может прилететь прямо на голову.
🕤Морозные зомби — накладывают эффект заморозки, швыряются ледяными шарами и могут буквально остановить игрока.
🕤Обычные зомби смогут превращаться в морозных, если упадут в …
Муху научили управлять СЕКС-игрушками— к ее мозгу подключили API buttplug.io.
Теперь она может управлять любыми вибраторами. Для тех, кому интересно, код закинули на GitHub.
📲 Технотренды
Claude снес разработчику 48 ТЫСЯЧ файлов — за полторы минуты.
Гений-вайбкодер попросил ИИ-агента собрать зеркало проекта, но вместо исполнения запроса нейронка написала скрипт полной очистки и снесла вообще все. Восстановить удалось лишь малое.
Самое смешное, что ИИ-агент написал «Я что-то сломал» уже после того, как уничтожил всю работу.
AGI, бесспорно.
📲 Технотренды
⚡️Discord ПЕРЕСТАНЕТ съедать ваш ПК — в тестовой версии мессенджера появился «Игровой режим».
Фича будет снижать нагрузку на систему во время игр: отключать лишние фоновые процессы, эффекты и анимации.
Обрадуйте корешей.
📲 Технотренды
Коронавирус в Питере — ВСЁ: в городе с 1 октября отменяют пандемийные ограничения, которые действовали с 2020 года.
Хорошие новости для петербуржцев.
📲 Технотренды
Человечество ждет эра НИЗКОГО IQ — глава NVIDIA считает, что детям больше не обязательно помнить таблицу умножения и уметь делить столбиком, ведь за них это сможет делать ИИ.
По словам Дженсена Хуанга, люди потеряют часть базовых навыков, но взамен станут лучше мыслить системно.
Дядя Хуанг разрешает.
📲 Технотренды
Кружки Telegram ОБНОВИЛИ — для Android выкатили апдейт, где можно настроить качество видеосообщений.
Настройки можно найти в версии 12.10.5 в меню отладки. Находим так:
🕤Обновляем Telegram;
🕤Открываем Настройки, пролистываем в самый низ и тыкаем два раза на номер версии;
🕤Включаем Show experimental settings;
🕤Заходим в раздел Round video и выкручиваем качество.
Обновление раскатывают постепенно.
📲 Технотренды
Забираем ТРЕВОЖНУЮ кнопку для ПК — GoHide за секунду прячет игры, чаты и браузер.
Достаточно нажать горячую клавишу, и окна исчезают вместе с кнопками на панели задач и даже иконками в «Пуске».
🕤Ctrl+Alt+H — спрятать всё
🕤Ctrl+Alt+Shift+H — вернуть обратно
Скрытые окна сами не всплывают, а звук из спрятанных видео автоматически отключается.
Полезное — здесь.
📲 Технотренды
⚡️Канье НЕ БУДЕТ выступать в Питере — американское агентство Access Opera заявило об отмене концерта.
Представитель агентства ответил одному из покупателей билетов, отправив его за возвратом денег в Say Agency.
В Access Opera также отметили, что российский организатор дезинформирует покупателей, а самого шоу, по их словам, не было с момента заявления «Газпром Арены».
«Канье любит русский народ»
— так американские…
Джонни Депп сыграет ПЬЯНОГО Джона Уика — вышел трейлер «Вечного странника».
По сюжету любитель коктейлей втягивает барменшу в криминальные разборки и отправляется на стрелки уже в подвыпившем состоянии.
Фильм снял режиссёр «500 дней лета» и «Нового Человека-паука». В России премьера состоится раньше американской — 25 марта.
Готовимся смотреть.
📲 Технотренды
Становимся ЖЕНЩИНОЙ всего за 270 рублей — в Steam вышел Woman Simulator, в котором нужно готовить, стирать, гладить и пылесосить.
Причем за вами будет следить муж, который не дает выбраться из дома. Вам нужно развести его на сумочку и сбежать из дома.
Имба на выходные — тут.
📲 Технотренды
❤43🗿32😁15🤯13🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 464 posts we hold for @techno_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@techno_media edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
1337 @media1337 · 1,152,508 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
PulseGPT | Новости, нейросети, гайды @Pulse_GPT · 45,162 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
Костыль @kostylofficial · 1,295,474 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
IT с перцем @hotcodeit · 159,264 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
ChatGPT | Нейросети @gptpublic · 270,410 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
ChatGPT 5 | Нейросети | Gemini @gpt_chat · 119,788 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 14 August 2026
Фриланс и Удаленная работа | let media @let_media · 63,679 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
4PDA Community @pda_4 · 88,340 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
TechGPT [🅽 🅴 🆆 🆂] 🤖 @TechGPTNews · 270,849 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
Chad GPT | Нейросети @AI_Chad · 21,241 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
GPT-4 Community @gpt4_tg · 54,143 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
GeekNeural @geekneural · 63,099 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Айтишная @aitshnya · 70,273 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Нейросети & Технологии | DeepTech @DeepTechNET · 289,489 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
ChatGPT 4.0 & [🅼🅹] | Bot News @ChatGPT_BotNews · 294,316 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
медиатрендс @mediatrends · 584,160 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
chad @chadgpt_ru · 138,551 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Нейролента @neirosety · 30,195 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
PRO | Нейросети @pro_neiroset · 31,807 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
openai_fan @backspace_media · 10 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
PROAI @pro_ai_news · 89,977 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
AI News | Нейросети @gpt_news · 288,295 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Hi, AI • Новости технологий @hiaimedia · 2,644,747 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
GPT | ChatGPT | Midjourney — GPTMain News @GPTMainNews · 1,667,989 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 August 2026
This channel appears in 99 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Технотренды” (@techno_media), 790,765 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techno_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
