Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,739–8,814 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 11:00
8,748
-10
12 Sept 2026, 23:20
8,758
-8
9 Sept 2026, 00:41
8,766
-15
3 Sept 2026, 18:59
8,781
-24
31 Aug 2026, 02:19
8,805
+26
27 Aug 2026, 18:47
8,779
-11
24 Aug 2026, 22:05
8,790
+21
21 Aug 2026, 18:27
8,769
-9
18 Aug 2026, 17:56
8,778
-6
15 Aug 2026, 12:03
8,784
-5
9 Aug 2026, 12:01
8,789
+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:56
8,788
+5
6 Aug 2026, 03:01
8,783
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:35
8,783
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 42 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
327 reactions across 42 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
45
13.8%
❤
34
10.4%
👍
32
9.79%
💊
29
8.87%
🤔
28
8.56%
😁
21
6.42%
🤣
21
6.42%
⚡
16
4.89%
🤷♂
11
3.36%
🗿
10
3.06%
🤩
10
3.06%
❤🔥
9
2.75%
👎
8
2.45%
😱
8
2.45%
☃
7
2.14%
😭
7
2.14%
✍
5
1.53%
🆒
4
1.22%
🍌
3
0.917%
👀
3
0.917%
7 further kinds
16
4.89%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 42 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @your_tech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.38%
1 of 42 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,590
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,490
over 41 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHm1YuX
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
на маках с M3 в Linux заработали веб-камера, микрофоны, USB 3.0 и Thunderbolt.
Asahi Linux — проект, который портирует Linux на компьютеры Apple без документации от производителя, то есть разбирая железо самостоятельно. В отчёте за цикл ядра 7.2 команда рассказала, где сейчас упирается.
Главная возня — с M4 и новее. В обычных ARM-системах ядро включает и выключает процессорные ядра через PSCI, а тот живёт в прошивк…
вышла Haiku R1/beta6, и на ней теперь работает настоящий Firefox — с официальным брендингом и разрешением Mozilla.
Haiku — открытая операционная система, которую сообщество пишет с 2001 года по мотивам BeOS; 25 лет проекту исполнилось за неделю до релиза. Прошлая бета была почти два года назад, за это время закрыли больше 530 тикетов.
Сборки на движке Firefox появились в репозиториях вскоре после прошлой беты, но б…
в Австралии задержали двух участников TeamPCP, тех самых, кто весной отравил Trivy. Помните март, когда сканер уязвимостей Trivy сам стал уязвимостью и утащил облачные ключи у LiteLLM, Mercor и десятков компаний? Австралийская полиция задержала в Перте двух человек, которых считает членами TeamPCP, группировки за этой атакой. Больше десятка обвинений, суд в четверг.
Цифры от ФБР и полиции: более 1000 взломанных орга…
у GitHub появилась галочка, которая закрывает все открытые issue, pull request'ы и обсуждения пользователя разом — в тот момент, когда вы его блокируете. Раньше блокировка лишь запрещала автору писать дальше, а всё, что он успел открыть, оставалось висеть, и разгребать это приходилось руками по одному.
Опция называется Close content authored by this user и живёт прямо в диалоге блокировки: хоть из комментария под is…
обновляешь PayPal до 10.10.0 на Pixel с GrapheneOS, а он падает на запуске с RootDetectionSecurityException: Security policy violation: s=root. Детектор root принял защиту самой ОС за взлом. Root там отсутствует: GrapheneOS его не поддерживает, а Play Services настоящие, не microG. Тред на HN собрал 226 комментариев за 7 часов.
Механика выяснилась по ходу: приложение оживает, если в настройках GrapheneOS для PayPal …
ИИ-агенты в Fortune 500 ставили пакеты, которых не существует. Их подсказала официальная документация
Представляешь: агенты Claude, Codex и Hermes внутри корпораций выполняли pip install и npm install по командам из файлов llms․txt на сайтах вендоров, хотя пакетов с такими именами в PyPI и npm нет. Исследователи из Израиля заняли несколько свободных имён, положили туда «звонок домой» и в течение часа получили отклик…
Стелс-модель ox-alpha оказалась GLM-5.3-Flash. Неделю её крутили на китайских чипах
Z.ai выпустила GLM-5.3-Flash: 320 млрд параметров, 18 млрд активных, 45 слоёв, контекст до 1 млн токенов, претрейн на 30 трлн токенов. Веса на Hugging Face. Z.ai подтвердила, что модель неделю тестировалась анонимно как ox-alpha на OpenRouter и OpenCode и стала самой популярной моделью недели; трафик шёл через китайские ИИ-ускорители…
Nvidia договорилась о покупке Hugging Face за $12,9 млрд. Подписей пока нет
По данным The Information, Nvidia согласилась купить Hugging Face за $12,9 млрд; Business Insider пишет об оценке выше $13 млрд: к вечеру среды соглашение не подписано, сделка может сорваться. Обе компании на запросы не ответили.
Для масштаба: раунд 2023 года прошёл при оценке $4,5 млрд, а в конце прошлого года HF отказалась от $500 млн той…
Сорок расширений Firefox притворялись криптокошельками и выносили фразы восстановления
Socket раскопал сеть из 77 аддонов и назвал её Offside Wallet Theft Factory. Сорок вредоносов выдают себя за OKX, Rabby Wallet, TronLink и другие Web3-продукты, а собирают фразы восстановления, приватные ключи, пароли из браузера и содержимое буфера обмена. Часть из них сначала работала безобидной утилитой и превращалась в стилер …
Вместо списка из .btn-primary, .btn-secondary и .btn-danger в CSS появится один .btn-*
Чтобы задать общий стиль всем кнопкам, сегодня приходится перечислять классы через запятую или вешать в разметку лишний общий класс. На августовской встрече рабочей группы CSS в Берлине приняли Class Prefix Selector: .btn-* цепляет любой класс, начинающийся с этого префикса. Идею предложила Лея Веру ещё в 2024 году.
Но радоваться…
Как понять, что программисту пора в отпуск:
— на столе бардак;
— шорты не доставались с позапрошлого лета;
— чудится тифлинг;
— на вопрос «когда отдыхаешь?» отвечает «после релиза»;
— релиз был в феврале.
Сам он с места не сдвинется. Помогите Типичному Программисту собраться и улететь в отпуск в новой мини-игре!
Stripe купил OpenRouter. Независимый маршрутизатор ИИ теперь принадлежит платёжке
OpenRouter задумали как шлюз без привязки к вендору: вы переключаете модели одним движением, выбираете GPT-4, Claude или что-то китайское. Чистая идея — равные модели и открытые сигналы.
По данным NYT, сделка обошлась в $7,5 млрд. Это крупнейшая покупка Stripe. Внезапно свобода выбора модели оказалась дороже всего, что компания покупа…
🤔6😱6🤨3💊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @your_tech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Типичный программист @tproger · 78,305 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
IT Юмор @ithumor · 60,568 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Фриланс и Удаленная работа | let media @let_media · 63,679 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Веб-страница @tproger_web · 22,429 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Представляешь,” (@your_tech), 8,748 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/your_tech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.