Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Говнокод

Channel

Говнокод

@g_code

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,872subscribers

-114 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001164712202
TypeChannel
Username@g_code
Created13 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/g_code

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,87214,98614,9296 August 2026 — 14,986 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,986 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,983 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,981 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,980 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,978 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,971 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,969 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,965 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,962 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,957 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,953 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,947 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,944 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,939 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,938 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,935 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,933 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,931 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,930 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,923 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,921 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,917 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,920 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,916 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,915 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,916 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,911 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,896 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,888 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,890 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,886 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,876 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,872 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,855–15,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 14:3914,872-4
19 Sept 2026, 14:3614,876-10
17 Sept 2026, 06:2114,886-4
15 Sept 2026, 05:5714,890+2
13 Sept 2026, 17:0114,888-8
11 Sept 2026, 22:1814,896-15
9 Sept 2026, 10:5914,911-5
6 Sept 2026, 03:1714,916+1
3 Sept 2026, 23:0114,915-1
2 Sept 2026, 15:4814,916-4
1 Sept 2026, 17:0414,920+3
31 Aug 2026, 16:1814,917-4
30 Aug 2026, 18:2814,921-2
28 Aug 2026, 23:1614,923-7
27 Aug 2026, 22:3314,930-1
26 Aug 2026, 23:0414,931-2
25 Aug 2026, 19:3914,933-2
24 Aug 2026, 22:3514,935-3
23 Aug 2026, 07:3514,938-1
21 Aug 2026, 19:0314,939first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 14,872 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,460
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held81 (28 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total34,370
Reactions total472
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,649 reactions across 78 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,33950.5%
🔥60923.0%
👏37814.3%
👎1636.15%
🥰1606.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,754 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,820 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Китайская нейросеть, которая заменяет подписку на GPT — бесплатно и оффлайн 2026 год – новая эпоха для DeepSeek. Китайская нейросеть работает прямо на вашем устройстве, обгоняет западные модели и снимает все ограничения: без подписок, без интернета, без контроля. Зерокодер обновил практикум и собрал все, что важно знать о локальных моделях и как с ними работать. ⚡️Что ждет вас на вебинаре? – Покажем, как установит…

👎4

30 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈2,940 views65 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Говнокод

🔥39👏19👍6👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @g_code. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IT Юмор
@ithumor · 60,568
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Programmer memes
@programmer_memes · 51,307
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Programmer & IT Memes
@itmemes · 123,290
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Уголок программиста
@conhum · 20,678
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
Библиотека программиста
@proglibrary · 78,288
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
The ExtremeCode Times
@extremecode · 35,596
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Веб-страница
@tproger_web · 22,429
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Двоичный кот
@binarcat · 30,827
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
ДЕВОПСИНА | DevOps | Linux
@devopsina · 23,617
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Типичный программист
@tproger · 78,305
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
GitHub Community
@github · 155,991
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
NOP::Nuances of Programming
@nuancesprog · 56,542
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Журнал «Код»
@thecodemedia · 49,232
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Оправдания для заказчика
@olegizvini · 32,923
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
Библиотека джависта | Java, Spring, Maven, Hibernate
@javaproglib · 22,022
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
Бумажный самолётик
@paperpublic · 42,048
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
FrontEndDev
@front_end_dev · 25,875
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Frontender's notes [ru]
@frontendnoteschannel_ru · 31,430
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
Библиотека фронтендера | Frontend, JS, JavaScript, React.js, Angular.js, Vue.js
@frontendproglib · 20,930
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Говнокод” (@g_code), 14,872 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/g_code.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.