Channel
@spectate_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,774subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001248546790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spectate_ru |
| Description | Spectate — это критический вебзин о современной культуре. Поддержать нас: https://boosty.to/spectate.ru 🕊 Наш ютуб-канал: https://www.youtube.com/@spectatezin Наш глазастый стикерпак: https://t.me/addstickers/spectate_ru |
| Created | 17 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spectate_ru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 4,774 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 4,768 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 4,765 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 4,766 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 May 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 7,160 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
296 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 296 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spectate_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Публикуем текст по итогам дискуссии «Методы ранней цветной фотографии в работах современных авторов», которая прошла в галерее PENNLAB @pennlab в рамках выставки Веры Лапонкиной «Структуры». Художница и куратор Екатерина Юшкевич, заведующая экспозиционно-выставочным отделом РОСФОТО @museumrosphoto, поговорила с художниками и исследователями о том, как и почему сегодня разные авторы обращаются к цветному процессу фото…
❤12
Издательство «Носорог» @nosorogmagazine при участии проекта «несовременник» @nsvrmnk открыло предзаказ на книгу Джузеппе Унгаретти «Веселье крушений». Унгаретти (1888–1970) — один из крупнейших поэтов ХХ века, реформатор итальянского стиха, «Веселье крушений» вошли произведения 1914–1919 годов — от довоенной лирики до фронтового цикла. В материале переводчик Петр Епифанов ответил на вопросы о философских истоках поэт…
❤16
В основе творческого метода Николая Алексеева @marginal_notes_studio — художника, куратора и преподавателя — эстетика найденных объектов, форм, видеозаписей и фотографий, которая складывается в децентрализованное «сетевое» повествование. Анастасия Хаустова поговорила с художником о его проектах, соотношении текста и образа, смерти искусства, а также о политическом измерении сетей, телесности и научной фантастики. ht…
❤17
Публикуем эссе психоаналитика Андрея Денисюка @andrey_denisyuk о специфике использования лакановского психоанализа Люблянской школой Славоя Жижека и компании, об их критике «наивного» леволиберального дискурса с опорой на тезис о нехватке и о том, как этот тезис можно обернуть против самих же словенцев. https://spectate.ru/speech/ «Предостережение по поводу истины и нападки на дискурс университета давно стали излюб…
❤10
В Санкт-Петербурге в музее «Полторы комнаты» @brodsky_online_museum до 29 июля идет выставка «Семь с половиной» Ирины Затуловской — художницы русского arte povera. Выставка входит в цикл «Мои Полторы комнаты», вступает в диалог с одноименным эссе Иосифа Бродского и состоит из «детских рисунков и рисунков для детей». Историк искусства и арт-критик Кристина Ким @velikiykanun написала о выставке рецензию-эссе, где переп…
❤8
Издательский проект «Лёд» @led_project выпустил книгу Дмитрия Хаустова @dima_cabre «Тёмные теории», посвященную истории и культурологическому анализу современной философии. Публикуем из нее фрагмент о том, как темной эстетике Лавкрафта удалось прорвать эпистемологическую блокаду кантианского корреляционизма. https://spectate.ru/kant-lovecraft/ «В одном месте Харман сказал: "Философия подходит к реальности не путем …
❤28
За прошедшие годы в российском контексте наметился тренд на сближение дискурса психотерапии и искусства, более того, выставок и отдельных проектов, посвященных этой теме, становится все больше. Куратор и социолог Евгения Гольман @allaboutevg анализирует причины и последствия взлета терапевтической культуры, нашедшей свое отражение в разнообразных практиках современных художников. https://spectate.ru/golman-therapy/ …
❤18
Сергей Гуськов @guskovtv рассказывает о выставке «Художники и фотография» в Центре визуальной культуры Béton @Betoncvc, которая позволяет по-новому поставить вопрос о фотографической подлинности в рамках столкновения классического фото-искусства, критического на уровне своей формы, с современным контекстом тотального медиа-подозрения, вызванного экспансией ИИ и нейросетей. https://spectate.ru/guskovice-beton/ «Неда…
❤10
Издательский проект «Лёд» @led_project готовит к выходу книгу американского философа и культуролога Джеффри Коэна «Камень. Экология нечеловеческого», который предлагает посмотреть на камень не как на реквизит, а как на протагониста истории и нарративов. Вооружившись постгуманистической исследовательской оптикой, источник своего исследования Коэн находит в средневековой литературе, где самоцветы исцеляют, курганы ожив…
❤11
Алина Машкина продолжает разговор о лиминальных пространствах и, вслед за антропологом Виктором Тернером, предлагает называть их лиминоидными, не столь явно сопряженными с календарными переходами, биологическими ритмами и циклическими процессами, а также допускающими гибкость и ошибку. Как лиминоидность соотносится с теорией фреймов Ирвинга Гофмана, «потоком» Чиксентмихайи, а также мифоритуальными пространствами — чи…
❤16
Критик и филолог Татьяна Сохарева рассуждает о взаимных переплетениях природы и музыки, звукопроизведения и слушания, нечеловеческих агентов и саундскейпа и о том, как композиторы, начиная с XVII века до наших дней, осмысляли эти переплетения через звук. https://spectate.ru/sonic-fiction/ «В более широком контексте sonic fiction — это поле потенций звукового воображения, способность музыки и звука порождать новые м…
❤17
Публикуем лекцию Дмитрия Хаустова @dima_cabre о философии Жиля Делёза и живописи Фрэнсиса Бэкона, прочитанную в культурном центре «Архэ» в феврале 2026 года. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLYKgQ6HPTw Настаивавший на том, что философии необходимо сталкиваться с «иными» сферами культуры, Жиль Делёз посвятил немало работ подобным пересечениям — однако редкие из них касались темы живописи. Тем более важным поэтому ок…
❤23
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spectate_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 38,443 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SPECTATE” (@spectate_ru), 4,774 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spectate_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.