Пропустила все, что можно, пока была в Завидово на REF. Восполняю пробелы, коллеги! Отсмотрела показ на TSUM Fashion Night, на который не попала. Оч понравились эти луки. Хочу так одеваться, пока погода позволяет! Прикольно, что модели спускались по эскалатору

Channel
ШМОТ
@zashmot
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
107,318subscribers
-1,163 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001344300300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zashmot |
| Description | Канал редактора моды, стилиста Алины Шкарупы (ex ELLE, Cosmo) @alinashkarupa Мое YouTube-шоу «Звездный гардероб»: https://youtube.com/@pro_shmot В реестре РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673754fb6afad41667bf2a5a®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 13 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zashmot |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 107,318 | -177 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 107,495 | -59 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 107,554 | -19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 107,573 | -46 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 107,619 | -71 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 107,690 | -85 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 107,775 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 107,798 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 107,799 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 107,800 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 107,787 | +55 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 107,732 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 107,739 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 107,775 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 107,796 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 107,832 | -32 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 107,864 | -52 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 107,916 | -62 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 107,978 | -35 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 108,013 | first reading |
Engagement
171 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.1%
- avg views ÷ 107,318 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,600
- 96 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 96
- of 171 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 171 (4 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,071,591 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈44,500
- Videos
- ≈1,650
- Links
- ≈1,390
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 12m 07s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.17%
- 2 of 171 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 20,100
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 20,700
- over 168 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjeBMRHm | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqvVLeg3 | 1 | 26 August 2026 | 26 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Джинсы и колготки с мотней, оторванные плечи и пришитые к волосам отрезанные хвосты — все, что впечатлило в новой коллекции Julie Kegels, победительницы LVMH Prize. Подиум, кстати, тоже сделали прикольный — мягкий, который можно продавить. Но не думаю, что моделям это понравилось
Поклонницы баулов, трепещите! Для вас есть нереальный лот. Бренд Dana Todler выпускает вот такие огромные (!!) сумки с принтами. Размер поражает воображение. Кажется, коллегам стилистам такое будет особенно актуально
По-моему, эти сапожки Marni — произведение искусства! Добавляется в вишлист и объявляется вещью дня
Проиграла Фурсу в битве стилистов и даже не плакала. Считаю, 5 лет терапии прошли успешно. Шучу, конечно плакала… А если серьезно, то оч рада была поучаствовать и побиться с моим харизматичным коллегой!!! Спасибо всем, кто пришел поддержать. ОТДЕЛЬНАЯ ЛЮБОВЬ ОТПРАВЛЯЕТСЯ К АЛЕКСЕЮ СУХАРЕВУ 🤍🤍🤍
Потрясающая работа с цветом и тканями у Bottega Veneta, но не могу отделаться от мысли, что все это какой-то апгрейднутый Jacquemus
Но если говорить серьезно, то вот этими женщинами Gucci очень хочется быть! Секси, гламурно, роскошно, очень дорого
Понятно, короче, буду наездницей
Устрою Фурсу взбучку
26 и 27 сентября на (REF) вместе с ЕМКА проведём «Битву стилистов». 26 сентября Наташа Доронина и Яна Старикова покажут свой взгляд на образ для деловой программы (REF). 27 сентября Данил Фурс и Алина Шкарупа соберут образы для вечера — когда деловая программа закончилась, а (REF) только начинается. Стилисты представят свои решения, расскажут о приёмах работы с вещами ЕМКА, а участники выберут победителя. 26–27 с…
Ну че, коллеги, погнали…
Как ощущается заход в VK ради интервью Оксаны Самойловой
Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @zashmot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fashion_mur · 208,4876 postsArbiter elegantiae
@elegantiae_a · 43,0083 postsФРОНТ РОУ
@frontroww · 45,7843 postsHYPENEWS
@hypenews · 23 postsНастроение фэшн
@ozzshow · 182 postsAURORE Fashion Brand
@Aurorebrand · 1711 postМиссТелеграм |
@Ms_krasota · 63,5391 postНата | Швейный нонконформизм
@NGGurskaya · 1461 postКукояка на связи♥️
@Panarinka · 77,3651 postБратья Барсуки
@PlyumChannel · 1971 postAESTHETIC LIFESTYLE
@aesthetics_daily · 401 postРаздаем стиль с Катей Акопян
@akopyanek · 2491 postANNADESIGN/АННА ДИЗАЙН
@annadesign_co · 751 postDaniil Antsiferov
@daniil_antsiferov · 2,0801 postdrama mama || драма мама
@drama0mama · 711 postФЕШН КОМА
@fashionkoma · 9761 post✨Fast Fashion✨|| Zara, Massimo Dutti и др. Доставка в РФ.
@fastfashionru · 1321 postГУЧЧИГЕНГ
@guccibangsta · 3101 postハートビート
@heartbreat2024 · 191 postIMAKEBAGS by Ksusha
@imakebags · 1,2341 postKAMILLA
@kamilla_hanapovaa · 2,0861 postKORKUNOVA
@korkunovadi · 15,3181 postMARINARIYS
@marinariyss · 10,3661 postМогу себе позволить
@mogupozvolit · 3891 postNOMOSTYLE
@nomorestyle · 4,0351 postОсобые вещи
@ov_homewear · 411 postPijmak
@pijmak · 2521 postКэрри Брэдшоу узбекского пиара
@prvbolshomgorode · 1,6331 postСаша Сулим
@sasha_sulim · 57,1061 postШопинг-терапия
@shopotherapy · 40,2401 postФорум "Сияние"
@sunshinechukotka · 361 postСвої люди
@svoi_lyudy · 51 postвремя сурка
@syr0k · 151 postМИША И КИТТИ
@zusammen_mode · 18,1071 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@fashion_mur · 208,4874 postsЯ не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,5064 postsшкомарова
@shkomarova · 17,3443 postsКсения Чилингарова
@chilichoice · 7,7632 postsGolden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,4092 postsПеченюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 34,5052 postsМодные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 73,5522 postsCopy Me
@copyme · 26,8331 postFashion dnevnik
@fashiondnevnik · 26,3651 postTHE STYLE DIRECTOR
@ibragimgatsievv · 13,4951 postТоп за свои деньги (Sasha Bokova)
@kuplyuhochu · 15,0401 postОтдел стиль жизни
@lifestylewhat · 46,0891 postMake Your Style
@make_your_style · 15,8011 postМамкина модница
@mamkina · 30,1341 postMarianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 95,1021 post(REF) ReFashion business campus
@refrefashion · 3,7121 postкабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,9361 postSCOTEENA
@scoteena · 14,4091 postKSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,6551 postСветские крошки LIVE
@svetskiekroshki · 79,0401 postТаня Столяр
@tanyastlr · 7,2511 postМИША И КИТТИ
@zusammen_mode · 18,1071 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@lifestylewhat · 46,0893 postsгоднота на авито
@godnotanaavito · 23,5992 postsКсения Соловьёва
@ksenia_solovieva · 52,0102 postsЖурнал «Москвичка»
@moskvichka_mag · 102,3222 postsMUR
@fashion_mur · 208,4871 postFROM RUSSIA WITH FASHION
@FromRussiaWithFashion · 56,6751 postK-KOD | К-КОД
@k_kodex · 1641 postТоп за свои деньги (Sasha Bokova)
@kuplyuhochu · 15,0401 postЧе по стилю?
@marusia_stile · 24,2061 post🪆Matreshka_mood
@matreshkamood · 981 postNew cut
@newcut0 · 7301 postЯ не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,5061 postСписок Телеграмм Каналов
@SpisokTelegramKanalov · 461 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@dog_rose · 1,6951 postFamilia
@famila_offprice · 324,6151 postFASHION PAPER
@fashionpaper · 52,5861 postslepestok & fire annd air
@fireanndair · 9,8931 postФокус Мода
@focus_moda · 10,6551 postФРОНТ РОУ
@frontroww · 45,7841 postгоднота на авито
@godnotanaavito · 23,5991 postДоступный стиль by Tsvetaeva
@korolevatsvetaeva · 27,8231 postТоп за свои деньги (Sasha Bokova)
@kuplyuhochu · 15,0401 postlamoda на связи
@lamoda_na_svyazi · 44,5341 postLEA
@lizaleaaminova · 1,3321 postMake Your Style
@make_your_style · 15,8011 postМамкина модница
@mamkina · 30,1341 postмурка московская
@mosmur · 16,9841 postЯ нашла это на Авито
@nashlanaavito · 14,0651 postПеченюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 34,5051 postшкомарова
@shkomarova · 17,3441 postМодные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 73,5521 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@sncmag · 301,646#1
@rogov24 · 189,279#2
@devilwearshandm · 72,543#3
@theblueprintru · 96,067#4
@myhotelki · 48,517#5
@strelets_molodec · 354,527#6
@styledbysmo · 38,655#7
@istominakarina · 157,220#8
@vrednayamoda · 188,094#9
@lifestylewhat · 46,089#10
@dukaliti · 122,992#11
@wearfeelings · 69,945#12
@sashaonline · 86,506#13
@copyme · 26,833#14
@burimovasasha · 81,553#15
@shkomarova · 17,344#16
@tdmood · 21,649#17
@dressedto · 41,575#18
@mamkina · 30,134#19
@ksbchk · 381,978#20
@zlayakiska · 73,552#21
@theosdnew · 47,464#22
@fashiondnevnik · 26,365#23
@mukhinss · 55,055#24
@straightface · 21,118#25
@editorsonvacation · 20,323#26
@goodmorningkarl · 56,164#27
@drunkfashion · 40,019#28
@superficialspacecadet · 24,767#29
@svintrovert · 84,226#30
@Viva_la_vika · 43,915#31
@shipilovaks · 46,818#32
@girl_who · 80,018#33
@aleko_n17 · 102,738#34
@ksenia_solovieva · 52,010#35
@azalial · 42,584#36
@bird_doesnt_doze · 24,103#37
@yagodnoelukoshko10 · 7,824#38
@shoesanddrinks · 27,058#39
@okarput · 30,682#40
@korolevatsvetaeva · 27,823#41
@mariemets · 23,308#42
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,835#43
@marinariyss · 10,366#44
@fashiontranzakciya · 12,597#45
@megastil · 13,440#46
@kosmetos · 15,683#47
@pinkbirkin · 13,933#48
@fashion_mur · 208,487#49
@goldchihuahua · 91,409#50
@spletni_tg · 187,952#51
@theblueprintnews · 72,402#52
@MinogarovaNews · 95,041#53
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402#54
@bloodysx · 1,178,521#55
@omanko · 113,987#56
@goshakartsev · 88,701#57
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630#58
@meduzalive · 1,122,482#59
@pechenuwki · 34,505#60
@mash · 3,110,586#61
@svetskiekroshki · 79,040#62
@kureelka · 124,698#63
@tatlersheroine · 100,724#64
@ibragimgatsievv · 13,495#65
@moscowmap · 2,668,820#66
@varlamov_news · 1,060,678#67
@budnigalliano · 27,869#68
@theblueprintcareer · 141,233#69
@religion_vogue · 25,449#70
@LIVfashionmag · 202,818#71
@Peopletalkru · 183,617#72
@kontext_channel · 855,067#73
@thynk · 70,521#74
@oksanarim1 · 36,056#75
@rogov_news · 31,010#76
@sale_caviar · 192,936#77
@naumita · 59,917#78
@kseniadenisovna · 33,821#79
@Buro247_ru · 25,655#80
@imnotbozhena · 504,326#81
@beautyzz · 18,434#82
@olga_shuranova · 49,773#83
@limestorecom · 93,482#84
@moskvichka_mag · 102,322#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wfcru · 26,157
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
@devilwearshandm · 72,543
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@ShopahoLee · 44,262
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@myhotelki · 48,517
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
@rogov24 · 189,279
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@anitagloss · 26,643
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 September 2026
@mamkina · 30,134
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@dressedto · 41,575
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@zlayakiska · 73,552
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
@km20conceptstore · 21,277
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 September 2026
@mosfweek · 22,123
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
@ilincognitio · 29,404
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
@theblueprintru · 96,067
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@salavat_kypere · 46,579
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
@godnotanaavito · 23,599
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
@okarput · 30,682
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@drunkfashion · 40,019
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@lamoda_na_svyazi · 44,534
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 27 August 2026
@fashionpaper · 52,586
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@wearfeelings · 69,945
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@goodmorningkarl · 56,164
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@aleko_n17 · 102,738
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@vrednayamoda · 188,094
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@arbuzimargiela · 20,469
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 179 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ШМОТ” (@zashmot), 107,318 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zashmot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.