• консультирую бренды в @dotcomms
• рассказываю, что делать с личными соцсетями https://vydolob.com/practicum
• пишу про модный бизнес
Автор – Юлия Выдолоб
📩 Для связи пишите в директ канала (внизу слева)
Created
22 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “askvydolob” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 98 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,289–8,412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 23:55
8,317
-2
7 Nov 2026, 20:46
8,319
-5
5 Nov 2026, 00:56
8,324
-14
2 Nov 2026, 09:57
8,338
-14
30 Oct 2026, 06:26
8,352
-18
26 Oct 2026, 19:57
8,370
-16
23 Oct 2026, 14:10
8,386
-10
20 Oct 2026, 22:56
8,396
-2
18 Oct 2026, 04:49
8,398
+14
14 Oct 2026, 20:46
8,384
+59
11 Oct 2026, 02:16
8,325
+22
5 Oct 2026, 00:37
8,303
-17
26 Sept 2026, 04:38
8,320
-1
15 Sept 2026, 19:20
8,321
+1
12 Sept 2026, 00:20
8,320
-9
7 Sept 2026, 18:20
8,329
-8
2 Sept 2026, 17:19
8,337
-7
30 Aug 2026, 05:23
8,344
-2
27 Aug 2026, 00:53
8,346
-17
23 Aug 2026, 22:27
8,363
first reading
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.17%
avg views ÷ 8,317 subscribers
Avg views / post
596
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
55 (7 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
8,945
Reactions total
398
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,540
Videos
≈156
Links
≈1,250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 21s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,633 reactions across 50 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,136
69.6%
🔥
210
12.9%
👍
85
5.21%
❤🔥
71
4.35%
💯
41
2.51%
🥰
38
2.33%
👏
24
1.47%
🙏
17
1.04%
🤔
7
0.429%
👌
2
0.122%
😢
2
0.122%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 51 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @askvydolob. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.82%
1 of 55 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
969
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,080
over 50 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxanGdh
1
22 August 2026
22 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Делюсь сетапом своей домашней «студии». Все видео я записываю дома: или за большим столом, или из кресла.
Я долго не могла подступиться к ютубу, потому что мне казалось, что запись — это сложно и дорого. Это и правда так, если у вас формат шоу (например, как Безфильтров Насти Полетаевой). Для моего же разговорного моно-формата хватает компьютера, телефона, микрофона и бесплатного приложения OBS. Думаю, можно и еще п…
Сегодня до 17.00 по Москве еще можно присоединиться к пятому потоку Практикума по личным соцсетям.
Как всегда, обновила продукт. Главный упор теперь на движении короткими спринтами: так участники сразу видят и ценят свои результаты. Эффект заметен уже на первой неделе (см. скрины).
Сегодня вечером пройдет групповое занятие с коучем — тоже новинка этого потока. Поговорим о том, какое место соцсети занимают в жизни у…
У карусели про отписки в Instagram* с вечера уже 14K просмотров. И это неудивительно: тема триггерная. Потерю мы переживаем сильнее, чем такое же приобретение, а отписка ещё и ощущается как отвержение (об этом, кстати, мы говорили с психотерапевткой Машей Потудиной в эфире «Страшно вести блог»).
И вот что интересно: без 3000 отписок не было бы 5000 подписок. Отписки — признак жизни, активности и того, что алгоритм п…
Я уже давно превратилась в самопровозглашенного гага-инфлюенсера — и очень этому рада. Про гагу я рассказывала тут, тут, даже брала интервью у ее основателя, хореографа Охада Наарина.
Давно хотела попасть в Тель-Авиве на гагу. И вот Юлия Выдолоб, которая сама ходит танцевать дважды в неделю, меня на нее вытащила.
Рассказываю: гага никоим образом не связана с Леди Гагой. Это направление современного танца, автор которого – хореограф Охад Нахарин, основатель труппы Batsheva (писала о нем здесь). Занятия проходят прямо в “штаб-квартире” “Батшевы”, центре танца Сюзан Деллаль в Неве-Цедеке.
Я – тот е…
Дорогие, доброе утро!
Ответила на ваши вопросы из чата: стоит ли на время Практикума сосредоточиться на одной соцсети и можно ли дублировать контент на разных площадках.
0:19 — одна соцсеть или несколько на время обучения
1:06 — как выбрать главную площадку
1:52 — если вы уже ведете несколько соцсетей
2:17 — дублировать контент или адаптировать
🎧 Фокусироваться на одной площадке или на нескольких? Дублировать контент или адаптировать?
У меня сейчас идет поток Практикума по личным соцсетям, и я в общем чате потока иногда отвечаю подкастами на вопросы участников. Решила сегодняшним голосовым поделиться с вами, так как в нем отвечаю на два довольно популярных вопроса.
#подкаст
Давно обещанный пост про бьюти. Знаете вот это «никто, абсолютно никто: вы часто спрашиваете меня про бьюти-рутину»? Так вот, меня правда спрашивают. А повод приятный: журнал Ксении Соловьевой «Соловей» попросил меня рассказать, ради каких процедур я приезжаю в Москву. Мои комментарии смотрите в карточках, ну а ниже расскажу про остальное.
Инвазивные процедуры. Перечислять не буду: проводить их все равно надо только…
Оба моих проекта взрослеют, и я всё чаще задумываюсь не только о том, каких результатов добиваются клиенты агентства и студенты Практикума, но и о том, какой опыт у них остаётся от работы с нами.
Понимаю, что это и есть жизненный цикл бизнеса: сначала ты создаёшь минимально жизнеспособный продукт и убеждаешься, что он нужен людям и даёт им то, за чем они пришли. А потом начинаешь работать над нюансами, которые усили…
Вопрос «что сегодня выложить?» я задаю последним.
Очень часто мы садимся за соцсети и первым делом спрашиваем себя, что выложить. И начинаем придумывать идею раньше, чем понимаем, зачем вообще нужен этот пост. Поэтому каждый раз приходится начинать с чистого листа, и на придумывание уходит масса времени. А от каждого поста ещё и хочется всего сразу: чтобы он привёл новых людей, понравился тем, кто уже читает, показа…
В четверг, 5 ноября, стартует пятый поток моего Практикума по личным соцсетям. Это последний поток в этом году: возможность вместе со мной наконец разобраться со своими соцсетями — и в 2027-м спокойно вести их, понимая, что и зачем вы делаете.
Для тех, кто давно присматривается к Практикуму, я сделала демо-неделю — с 5 по 11 ноября. Будет бодро: планируем спринт, на котором вы поставите себе цель на неделю, сделаете…
❤8👍7👌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @askvydolob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@askvydolob edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Отдел стиль жизни @lifestylewhat · 45,640 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Безфильтров @bezfiltrov_show · 28,825 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Осовцов говорит @osovtsovgovorit · 80,167 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Будни Гальяно @budnigalliano · 27,776 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
shoes&drinks @shoesanddrinks · 27,032 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
psycho daily @psychodaily · 18,918 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
Ксения Соловьёва @ksenia_solovieva · 51,743 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Гуд морнинг, Карл! @goodmorningkarl · 55,729 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
BURO. @Buro247_ru · 25,433 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
Copy Me @copyme · 26,652 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
РазразиМеняМаржела @arbuzimargiela · 20,688 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 September 2026
состояние потока @optimalexperience · 20,542 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Style Tricks @styletricks · 23,991 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
superficial space cadet @superficialspacecadet · 24,930 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
РБК Стиль @rbcstyle · 35,752 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
Сделай лицо попроще @straightface · 21,148 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
Bon Mot @lebonmot · 36,851 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Olga Karput 🥬 @okarput · 31,073 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
ТАБОР @ta_bor · 19,698 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 October 2026
editors on vacation @editorsonvacation · 19,960 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
KK @kseniadenisovna · 33,172 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Mukhins @mukhinss · 54,316 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
Серьезный подход @tooseriousnotes · 34,264 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
МиссТелеграм | @Ms_krasota · 62,726 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“да и нет” (@askvydolob), 8,317 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/askvydolob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.