Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 102 days, net +1,705. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,872–38,399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Nov 2026, 17:17
36,347
-87
12 Nov 2026, 06:59
36,434
-40
10 Nov 2026, 05:58
36,474
-62
8 Nov 2026, 15:06
36,536
-41
7 Nov 2026, 06:25
36,577
-21
6 Nov 2026, 07:45
36,598
-37
5 Nov 2026, 04:07
36,635
-35
4 Nov 2026, 04:49
36,670
-49
3 Nov 2026, 06:29
36,719
-32
2 Nov 2026, 04:08
36,751
-54
1 Nov 2026, 06:44
36,805
-34
31 Oct 2026, 07:46
36,839
-39
30 Oct 2026, 09:54
36,878
-46
29 Oct 2026, 09:06
36,924
-343
28 Oct 2026, 06:09
37,267
-610
27 Oct 2026, 05:08
37,877
+942
26 Oct 2026, 07:21
36,935
+1,809
25 Oct 2026, 08:54
35,126
+287
24 Oct 2026, 05:47
34,839
+179
23 Oct 2026, 03:31
34,660
first reading
Engagement
653 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.23%
avg views ÷ 36,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,990
220 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
222
of 653 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held
653 (5 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total
657,934
Reactions total
28,876
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 17m
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 168 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
91,106 reactions across 649 posts, in 884 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17,790
19.5%
😁
8,290
9.10%
😭
4,839
5.31%
🔥
4,800
5.27%
💯
4,290
4.71%
💅
2,694
2.96%
💔
2,450
2.69%
🤯
2,050
2.25%
💘
1,278
1.40%
custom 5350277065985769309
1,230
1.35%
custom 5330287403426923776
1,188
1.30%
🙏
854
0.937%
😢
622
0.683%
custom 5327875976858714948
586
0.643%
🤝
583
0.64%
💋
547
0.6%
😍
510
0.56%
custom 5395693854059938190
447
0.491%
custom 5469945497781306069
418
0.459%
custom 5323619724397922386
412
0.452%
864 further kinds
35,228
38.7%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 650 of the 653 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91,200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 653 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
50
of 650 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pechenuwki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 653 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.153%
1 of 653 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,010
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,020
over 649 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJyyFAZ
1
30 September 2026
30 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 653 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 28 of 222 posts held from the last 30 days (12.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Наш редактор, а иногда и спецкор, Фатима aka Печенюшки выбрала довольно нишевый маршрут, чтобы «развеяться» вне Москвы, — Минск. Завершая свой трехдневный тур по картофельной столице, она, воодушевившись увиденным и съеденным, решила поделиться впечатлениями, опытом и мини-гидом — вдруг кому-то тоже непреодолимо захочется сменить обстановку всего за 9 часов на поезде 🚂
Дождливая погода, выпавшая на все дни моего пут…
Сашенька, и все все другие, что поддержали нас (а ведь у меня даже времени не было попросить об этом и пригласить лично 🥺 но от того приятнее, что вы не прошли мимо) — спасибо вам большое!! Все вижу и ценю, и вы знаете — моя площадка всегда для вас открыта 🫂 ЖДЕМ ВСЕХ 🫵
Амбассадор Valentino в полном наряде Valentino на широко разрекламированном свидании с её парнем-амбассадором Dolce Gabbana, на котором подозрительно заметно видно логотип нижнего белья Dolce Gabbana.
Ахпхаха
Showing the 12 most recent of 653 posts we hold for @pechenuwki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@pechenuwki edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 78 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
KSUSHA SMO @styledbysmo · 38,697 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
MUR @fashion_mur · 205,098 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
KM20 @km20conceptstore · 20,993 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 September 2026
editors on vacation @editorsonvacation · 19,936 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
shoes&drinks @shoesanddrinks · 27,032 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Mukhins @mukhinss · 54,316 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
ГОРИ ЯСНО @gori_yasno · 21,931 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
Сделай лицо попроще @straightface · 21,145 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
Golden Chihuahua @goldchihuahua · 91,160 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Olga Karput 🥬 @okarput · 31,062 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
The Blueprint News @theblueprintnews · 72,311 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
как стать девочкой-волшебницей @postmodernsoldier · 29,325 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Будни Гальяно @budnigalliano · 27,767 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Вишлист @myhotelki · 48,050 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
VOGUE-religion @religion_vogue · 23,503 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
SALAVAT KYPERE @salavat_kypere · 46,287 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!! @sashaonline · 85,987 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
it's 1983, Italy @northitaly · 28,598 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Bon Mot @lebonmot · 36,851 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Vika Chuma @chumavecherinka · 19,378 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
СИНЬКА @thynk · 69,263 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Drunk_fashion @drunkfashion · 40,027 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
superficial space cadet @superficialspacecadet · 24,926 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Модные хроники Злой Киски @zlayakiska · 75,212 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 112 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Печенюшки&Co” (@pechenuwki), 36,347 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pechenuwki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
