Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -373. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,225–47,912 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 21:06
47,460
-26
9 Nov 2026, 07:47
47,486
-1
7 Nov 2026, 19:58
47,487
-3
6 Nov 2026, 16:56
47,490
-10
5 Nov 2026, 14:28
47,500
-11
4 Nov 2026, 14:24
47,511
-5
3 Nov 2026, 10:51
47,516
-22
2 Nov 2026, 13:19
47,538
-13
1 Nov 2026, 15:27
47,551
-12
31 Oct 2026, 13:00
47,563
-6
30 Oct 2026, 15:45
47,569
-1
29 Oct 2026, 17:06
47,570
-10
28 Oct 2026, 18:59
47,580
-6
27 Oct 2026, 19:10
47,586
-5
26 Oct 2026, 16:55
47,591
-13
25 Oct 2026, 19:46
47,604
-14
24 Oct 2026, 23:01
47,618
+48
23 Oct 2026, 22:36
47,570
+105
23 Oct 2026, 00:59
47,465
+13
21 Oct 2026, 22:55
47,452
first reading
Engagement
88 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 47,460 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 88 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
88 (24 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
251,390
Reactions total
3,652
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,870
Videos
≈661
Links
≈1,490
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 35s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,343 reactions across 88 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,343
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,343 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 88 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @theosdnew. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 88 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Обожаю ювелирные аукционы. 11 числа, Сотби продали сапфир Романовых за почти 5.000.000$ (с налогами) - больше чем вдвое выше эстимейта. Цейлонский камень весом 197,80 карата, без следов нагревания, с сохранившейся исторической огранкой, предположительно эпохи Великих Моголов. Его носила мать Николая II, императрица Мария Фёдоровна. На знаменитом балу 1903 года в Зимнем дворце сапфир украшал её юбку в оправе Фаберже. …
Уже сегодня в прокат выходит фильм «Лиля» о главной женщине в жизни Маяковского.
Кино об одной из самых загадочных женщин русского авангарда, ее отношениях с Владимиром Маяковским и Осипом Бриком. Совсем недавно мечтал об экранизации ее жизни, и вот. Очень интересно как будет решена визуальная сторона картины. События до 1930 года сняты в черно-белой гамме с отсылками к фотографиям Александра Родченко. Костюмы воссо…
Я как-то выпал из жизни глянцевой прессы этой осенью, а меж тем Катя Табакова тихонечко так застилизовала обложку Vmagazine с Пенелопой Круз что весьма почетное дело и в совершенно ушедших из нашей жизни международных социальных температурах, не то что текущих. Круто невозможно! Все же отличный вкус стирает любые границы. Кать 💪🏻❤️
Первый ряд камерного шоу Sate Venice великолепен. Как, впрочем и все. Очень нравится, знаю что будут носить самые модные девочки Москвы и ближнего зарубежья в ближайший сезон.
Забегая вперед сразу скажу что очень много поклонов как и YSL 90х так и Prada в районе 10х
Нравится безоговорочно. Ибра loooove!
Российский изобретатель Константин Чайкин получил приз «За дерзость» Женевского Гран-при часового искусства 2026 (это как часовой «Оскар»).
Его «Загадка тонкого короля» обладает толщиной всего 1,65 мм и сапфировыми дисками без видимых спиц, из-за чего кажется, что указатели парят в воздухе.
Какие же у меня крутые друзья. Я каждый раз смотрю и не понимаю за что мне повезло быть окруженными гениальными людьми. Настя Полетаева похоже запускает бренд платьев для бальных танцев и будь я в деле, после этих фото сделанных Абдуллом Артуевым (первая картинка 😍💔)пошел бы шиться только к ней.
Конкретно это платье создано в содружестве с Кристиной Лисовец-Касап (Say No More), работа заняла больше двух месяцев. Расш…
Сходил на открытие нового проекта Владимира Чистякова и Глеба Гайгера - «Тандем». Давно небыл такой счастливый: сладкая вата, пупырки, винил, бильярд, фотобудка и много очень качественных и красивых людей, я в счастье. Очень похоже что это будет одна из главнейших точек кипения на московской карте, причем как ночной так и ранее вечерней жизни. Вышло где-то посередине и совсем молодежного и поздне хипстерского и све…
Вот это поворот. Coperni объявляют о закрытии в связи с непримиримым конфликтом с ведущим акционером. Поклонником их никогда небыл, но очень понимаю как они себя чувствуют. История была яркая, хоть и всего 8 лет.
Вот это я понимаю старая гвардия выступает. Наконец великая красота. Не хайп, не очередные люди по повестке со знаменем за все хорошее против всего плохого. А безупречная Клава Шиффер в объективе Давида Симса. Я говорил что так будет. Я говорил что на люмпен пролетариат смотреть бесконечно невозможно.
Горжусь подружкой, платья Belik в большом кино! Маша талантливейший дизайнер. Если кто-то не согласен - сочувствую, у вас отказал вкус. Кстати фильм смотрел, и это хорошее кино, прошло малозаметно, а там и Аня Тейлор Джой (моя малышка) и Крис Эванс (все знаем чем он ценен) ))))
У Clive Christian (нежно мной любимых, и мне прям очень сильно срать что парфблоггеры закатят глаза, мол необоснованно дорого - копите, мне все обоснованно) сегодня новый запуск - Uncovered. Сам аромат живьем еще не оценил, но визуал безупречный. Презентацию делали совместно с Гарри Нуриевым. Расспросил Юлию Кулон (Co-Founder & Global Marketing Director Clive Christian) о новинке - рассказала что выбирали в слепом ко…
❤79
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @theosdnew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Vika Chuma @chumavecherinka · 19,389 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
suharevstyle @suharevstyle · 25,519 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
Янковская @myankovskaya · 19,232 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
ROGOV.NEWS @rogov_news · 30,601 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
РазразиМеняМаржела @arbuzimargiela · 20,688 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 September 2026
Jewellery Digest @jeweldigest · 21,408 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Olga Karput 🥬 @okarput · 31,073 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Безфильтров @bezfiltrov_show · 28,825 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Globe Trotter @Gtrotter · 20,782 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 September 2026
ROGOV @rogov24 · 184,474 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Парнасский пересмешник @captainpaleo · 51,795 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
Mukhins @mukhinss · 54,358 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
Гуд морнинг, Карл! @goodmorningkarl · 55,729 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
The Blueprint @theblueprintru · 96,489 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
ШМОТ @zashmot · 105,426 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
shoes&drinks @shoesanddrinks · 27,032 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Отказала модная железа @Modnayazheleza · 94,453 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
поясни за ренессанс @chtozakartina · 21,315 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
ПОЗАВЧЕРАШНИЕ НОВОСТИ/МАША МИНОГАРОВА😎 @MinogarovaNews · 93,816 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
Модный подкаст @modnypodcast · 19,470 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Style Tricks @styletricks · 23,991 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
Вишлист @myhotelki · 48,092 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
YUNA / Юния Пугачева @yunapugacheva · 28,169 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Журнал «Москвичка» @moskvichka_mag · 104,332 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Osd” (@theosdnew), 47,460 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theosdnew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.