Бренд с высокой геммологической экспертизой в премиум сегменте ювелирных украшений.
Наш сайт: https://akbrilliant.ru
Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68c3c6acf19d314b5b7e9d34
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +2,305. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,293–34,822 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 15:06
34,415
+1,270
16 Aug 2026, 05:05
33,145
+1,445
14 Aug 2026, 15:37
31,700
-59
13 Aug 2026, 05:23
31,759
-158
12 Aug 2026, 02:52
31,917
-22
11 Aug 2026, 04:14
31,939
-39
10 Aug 2026, 01:31
31,978
-56
9 Aug 2026, 02:21
32,034
-32
8 Aug 2026, 01:34
32,066
-44
7 Aug 2026, 06:00
32,110
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.64%
avg views ÷ 34,415 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,630
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
30 (12 July 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
68,327
Reactions total
1,964
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
230
Videos
151
Links
225
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8m 49s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,223 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
640
28.8%
custom 5319230830462144562
595
26.8%
😍
364
16.4%
🔥
305
13.7%
💘
206
9.27%
🤩
89
4.00%
👍
24
1.08%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,223reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В шахматах главное — продумать следующий ход..
Но правила этой партии нам определённо нравятся больше 🫥
Осталось выбрать, какое кольцо Академии Бриллиантов станет вашим следующим ходом 🫥
Ждём вас в наших магазинах в 16 городах России — найти ближайший можно в разделе «Магазины» на сайте или в приложении.
Реклама
Обручальные кольца выбирают на всю жизнь, поэтому важно обращать внимание не только на дизайн🫥
Рассказываем, что такое кольца с комфортной посадкой, чем они отличаются от классических моделей и почему этот нюанс действительно стоит учитывать при выборе🫥
Реклама
Говорят, желание нельзя произносить вслух. Но как тогда ему сбыться?
Поэтому если ваше желание выглядит примерно так — лучше всё-таки намекнуть 🫥
На видео эксклюзивное кольцо из белого золота с природным сапфиром из Мадагаскара 2.12 ct в центре и природными бриллиантами.
Глубокий синий оттенок сапфира, сияние бриллиантов и дизайн, который точно не останется незамеченным.
Показывайте тому, кто должен исполнить жел…
Дарим золотую подвеску💎
Как принять участие:
— Подпишитесь на наш канал;
— Нажмите кнопку «Участвовать»;
— Поставьте реакции на наши последние публикации на удачу.
И, конечно, отправляйте этот пост близким🤍
Победителя определим случайным образом 1 сентября и объявим в отдельном посте.
Желаем удачи✨
А что, если украшение, которое вы ищете, ещё не существует?
В Академии Бриллиантов есть собственное Ювелирное Ателье — пространство, где ваши идеи обретают драгоценную форму🫥
Можно начать с чистого листа или взять за основу модель из коллекций бренда: выбрать металл, изменить дизайн, подобрать камень с нужными характеристиками или предложить собственный эскиз.
То самое кольцо, которое вы представляли в деталях. По…
Когда говорят «выращенный бриллиант», многие представляют себе что угодно — от 3D-принтера до стекла.
На самом деле процесс выглядит совсем иначе!
В видео показываем, как в лаборатории создают условия, при которых начинает расти алмаз, и объясняем весь процесс простыми словами💎
Кажется, выбрать подарок для любимой женщины — задача со звездочкой 🫥
Как понять, что ей действительно понравится? На что обратить внимание, если хочется не просто подарить украшение, а вызвать искренние эмоции?
Хорошая новость — есть несколько критериев, которые помогут не ошибиться с выбором!
В этом видео рассказываем, на что обратить внимание, чтобы украшение стало именно тем подарком, который она будет носить …
Еще несколько лет назад помолвочное кольцо почти всегда оставалось сюрпризом 🫥
Сегодня все больше пар выбирают его вместе. И дело вовсе не в том, что романтики стало меньше!
Просто помолвочное кольцо — украшение, которое должно нравиться именно той, кто будет видеть его на своей руке долгие годы 🫥
Реклама
Совсем скоро летнее солнце уступит место уютным вечерам, ароматным пирогам с чаем и золотой листве за окном 🫥
Но пока август еще дарит теплые дни — хочется ловить каждый луч. Особенно тот, что превращает грани бриллиантов в россыпь ярких бликов.
В Академии Бриллиантов вы можете найти потрясающие украшения с бриллиантами и драгоценными камнями, которые будут сиять вместе с вами еще долгие годы!
Реклама
Не включайте это видео, если ищете способы сэкономить на помолвочном кольце 🫥
Спойлер: ничего не получится!
Потому что для любимой хочется выбрать самое красивое.
Например, кольцо с нежно-розовым синтетическим ограненным алмазом в огранке «кушон».
И самое верное решение — выбрать его в Академии Бриллиантов 🫥
Реклама
Как геммологи определяют свойства драгоценного камня?
Для этого используют профессиональное оборудование, о котором знают далеко не все🔬
Сегодня в Научном Геммологическом Центре показываем один из самых интересных приборов — полярископ. Рассказываем, для чего он нужен и какую информацию помогает получить о камнях.
Переходите в НГЦ — новый пост уже ждет вас 🫥
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 531923083046214456221🔥12❤6💘5😍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @diamondsacademyru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если бы можно было выбрать только одно кольцо — какое забрали бы без раздумий?
Белое золото🤍48%
Жёлтое золото🧡52%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 5,855 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Академия Бриллиантов” (@diamondsacademyru), 34,415 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diamondsacademyru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.