Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гуд морнинг, Карл!

Channel

Гуд морнинг, Карл!

@goodmorningkarl

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

56,190subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001041599776
TypeChannel
Username@goodmorningkarl
DescriptionВсе что нужно знать о моде и модных медиа от ex-редактора Vogue, Interview, The Blueprint 18+. По рекламе @pamanya Все остальное @katyafedorova Регистрация в РКН № 5904305734
Created19 April 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/goodmorningkarl

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Good morning, Karl! — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

56,09056,26856,1795 August 2026 — 56,268 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,268 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,259 subscribers7 August 2026 — 56,242 subscribers8 August 2026 — 56,232 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,221 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,193 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,178 subscribers12 August 2026 — 56,186 subscribers13 August 2026 — 56,177 subscribers15 August 2026 — 56,170 subscribers16 August 2026 — 56,153 subscribers17 August 2026 — 56,151 subscribers18 August 2026 — 56,140 subscribers19 August 2026 — 56,137 subscribers20 August 2026 — 56,130 subscribers21 August 2026 — 56,118 subscribers22 August 2026 — 56,124 subscribers24 August 2026 — 56,107 subscribers25 August 2026 — 56,109 subscribers26 August 2026 — 56,101 subscribers27 August 2026 — 56,095 subscribers28 August 2026 — 56,136 subscribers29 August 2026 — 56,116 subscribers30 August 2026 — 56,127 subscribers31 August 2026 — 56,109 subscribers1 September 2026 — 56,090 subscribers2 September 2026 — 56,097 subscribers3 September 2026 — 56,092 subscribers6 September 2026 — 56,147 subscribers9 September 2026 — 56,145 subscribers12 September 2026 — 56,148 subscribers13 September 2026 — 56,137 subscribers15 September 2026 — 56,148 subscribers17 September 2026 — 56,190 subscribers56,1905 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,063–56,295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:5756,190+42
15 Sept 2026, 10:0156,148+11
13 Sept 2026, 17:4056,137-11
12 Sept 2026, 00:1756,148+3
9 Sept 2026, 11:5756,145-2
6 Sept 2026, 03:5956,147+55
3 Sept 2026, 19:3856,092-5
2 Sept 2026, 11:1356,097+7
1 Sept 2026, 10:4756,090-19
31 Aug 2026, 13:2556,109-18
30 Aug 2026, 11:4856,127+11
29 Aug 2026, 09:4656,116-20
28 Aug 2026, 10:3356,136+41
27 Aug 2026, 06:5756,095-6
26 Aug 2026, 08:1656,101-8
25 Aug 2026, 08:0256,109+2
24 Aug 2026, 07:1856,107-17
22 Aug 2026, 14:3456,124+6
21 Aug 2026, 07:5756,118-12
20 Aug 2026, 10:0656,130first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 56,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,400
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held29 (17 July 20266 September 2026)
Views total44,800
Reactions total632
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 15:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16,700
Videos
666
Links
5,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,216 reactions across 28 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,78880.7%
👍25111.3%
👎1777.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.45%
1 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
6,570
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,990
over 28 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwCZUfD113 August 202613 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC≈6,670 views126 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥Молния. Дональд Трамп решил кардинально сменить имидж и перекрасить свой дерзкий рыжий в глубокий и сдержанный сдержанный каштановый, а любая девушка знает что резкие перемены имиджа обычно не с добра. Но пока Мелания не рубанула карешку, думаю у нас нет повода волноваться.

👍8242👎2

2 Sept 2026, 13:27 UTC≈9,110 views115 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Я почти уже забыла ощущение темного липкого ужаса, которые потихоньку разливается по телу от таких новостей. Но нет. Дна нет. И достаточно thick skin чтобы не реагировать на такие новости не вырастет уже. Да и не хотелось бы. Противостоять ему можно только если что то делать чтобы помочь. Кто знает что это могло бы быть, напишите в личку

115

2 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC≈6,500 views66 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @theblueprintnews

⚡️Лиде Мониаве, основательнице «Дома с маяком», предъявили обвинение в распространении «фейков» о российской армии. Об этом сообщает РБК со ссылкой на ее адвоката. Мониаве вменяют статью о распространении заведомо ложной информации о Вооруженных силах РФ. По данным издания, обвинение предъявило следствие. Ей может грозить до 10 лет лишения свободы. Мониава основала «Дом с маяком» — фонд, который помогает детям и мо

👎633

2 Sept 2026, 11:14 UTC≈5,790 views103 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @shoesanddrinksPhoto

Поскольку Мет нужна новая тема на следующий год, выношу на обсуждение: как насчёт Долли Партон? Не Гальяно, конечно, но «it costs a lot of money to look this cheap». Тема, между прочим, отличная и, к сожалению, своевременная, — и куда более костюмная, чем кажется: 60 лет одного непрерывно доработанного образа, парики, стразы, самодельные лифы из ранних лет, кантри-эстетика, которую индустрия презирала) Плюс сама цит

103

31 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈5,750 views44 reactionsread 23 September 2026

@sorokabarokko очень точно передал мое негодование по поводу отмены выставки Гальяно, а я даже не еврейка. https://t.me/theblueprintru/47221

👍2717

31 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC≈5,600 views134 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Мы кэнселили, кэнселили да закэнселились. И ведь казалось бы есть в этом мире люди которые заслуживают кэнселинга куда более оступившегося сто лет назад и извинившегося и изменившегося Джона Гальяно. Очень жаль команду которая уже наверное несколько лет работала над выставкой мечты, которая теперь не состоится и нас всех кто всю эту невероятную красоту не увидит.

107👎15👍12

31 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC≈5,380 views44 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @theblueprintnewsPhoto

⚡️Выставка Джона Гальяно в Met не состоится. После обсуждений с руководством Метрополитен-музея дизайнер решил отказаться от выставки John Galliano: Horizons, которую планировали открыть в Институте костюма в мае 2027 года. По словам Гальяно, он не хочет, чтобы споры вокруг его прошлого отвлекали внимание от работы музея и доставляли кому-либо боль. Предысторию конфликта можно прочесть здесь. 🔹The Blueprint News |

👎39👍41

19 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈8,210 views74 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

69👎5

14 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈9,100 views35 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Обожаю, когда новые технологии оказываются хорошо забытой историей. Весь XIX век и половину XX «примерка» вообще не предполагала, что ты куда-то идёшь. Портной или модистка приезжали к клиентке домой с отрезами и картонками, всё смотрелось при своём свете, в своём зеркале и никто никуда не торопился. Потом появились универмаги и мы все дружно переехали в примерочные с плохими лампами и очередью. Так вот Яндекс Марк

34👎1

14 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈6,600 views43 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @bbbreakingPhoto

Cartier не смог запретить Sunlight использовать свой дизайн, пишет "Коммерсант". Швейцарский холдинг Richemont, специализирующейся на продаже предметов роскоши, потерпел очередное поражение в споре с Sunlight из-за копирования элементов культовой коллекции Cartier Love. В России апелляционный суд отклонил жалобу истца. Причины — отсутствие апостилей на выписках швейцарской стороны и недоказанность перехода прав от

21👎17👍5

13 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC≈6,570 views16 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwCZUfDPhoto

T-Private и отель Stella di Mosca запустили летнее пространство с поп-ап мастерской Для T-Private персонализация — не просто часть сервиса, а целая философия. Именно поэтому во дворе отеля Stella di Mosca недавно открылась летняя поп-ап мастерская. Каждые выходные станут особенными для клиентов сервиса и гостей отеля: до 6 сентября посетители вместе с мастерами смогут собирать персонализированные изделия. 14 - 16 ав

12👎4

13 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈5,990 views130 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

Желаю вам всем настроя как у этой девочки, дорогие фэшионисты

116👍14

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @goodmorningkarl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,518
#1
Сорока-барокко
@SorokaBarokko · 18,639
#2
«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 141,233
#3
Bon Mot
@lebonmot · 36,894
#4
Сделай лицо попроще
@straightface · 21,113
#5
Мегастиль
@megastil · 13,467
#6
Беседы о русской халтуре
@Dialogiorusskoihalture · 9,227
#7
рама энджой
@ramilmustav · 11,890
#8
FLACON MAGAZINE
@flacon_mag · 46,445
#9
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,479
#10
MUR
@fashion_mur · 208,487
#11
The Blueprint
@theblueprintru · 96,067
#12
The Blueprint News
@theblueprintnews · 72,402
#13
shoes&drinks
@shoesanddrinks · 27,042
#14
Отдел стиль жизни
@lifestylewhat · 46,126
#15
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,774
#16
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 107,495
#17
superficial space cadet
@superficialspacecadet · 24,701
#18
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 100,724
#19
Osd
@theosdnew · 47,490
#20
Mukhins
@mukhinss · 55,055
#21
Copy Me
@copyme · 26,865
#22
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 123,032
#23
Долецкая-Doletskaya
@alionadol · 76,246
#24
Ксения Соловьёва
@ksenia_solovieva · 52,010
#25
Злой Редактор
@wkola_zloslovia · 9,746
#26
да и нет
@askvydolob · 8,321
#27
Модные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 73,280
#28
Drunk_fashion
@drunkfashion · 40,044
#29
Зинаида Пронченко
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,324
#30
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 157,537
#31
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 355,464
#32
KSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,718
#33
Безфильтров
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,809
#34
Дудь
@yurydud · 864,661
#35
GOSHA KARTSEV
@goshakartsev · 88,841
#36
РазразиМеняМаржела
@arbuzimargiela · 20,431
#37
Будни Гальяно
@budnigalliano · 27,853
#38
V I V A L A V I K A
@Viva_la_vika · 44,199
#39
ПОЗАВЧЕРАШНИЕ НОВОСТИ/МАША МИНОГАРОВА😎
@MinogarovaNews · 95,130
#40
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 372,627
#41
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,526
#42
ÖMANKÖ
@omanko · 114,097
#43
editors on vacation
@editorsonvacation · 20,352
#44
t.d.mood
@tdmood · 21,678
#45
Даша Веледеева
@dashaveledeeva · 6,755
#46
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода
@vrednayamoda · 188,661
#47
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,936
#48
KK
@kseniadenisovna · 33,821
#49
Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 84,110
#50
Чувства Wearующих
@wearfeelings · 70,024
#51
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,468
#52
PEOPLETALK
@Peopletalkru · 182,678
#53
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,870
#54
BUYOLOGIE | Анастасия Новая
@almost_visionaire · 4,371
#55
fashionchain
@fashionchain · 5,760
#56
Луис Иванович
@LIVfashionmag · 203,725
#57
Д Р Е С С - К О Д (ex. Dressed to Kill)
@dressedto · 41,678
#58
YvesSaintStazher
@yvessaintstazhor · 7,288
#59
Make Your Style
@make_your_style · 15,838
#60
СЕРГЕЙ НАУМОВ
@naumita · 60,091
#61
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,361
#62
Київ Фешн Лавез
@KyivFashionHell · 5,688
#63
Парнасский пересмешник
@captainpaleo · 52,172
#64
ОЙСАШ🚀
@etosashaaaa · 54,206
#65
Pink Birkin
@pinkbirkin · 13,881
#66
NISNEVICH
@nisnevic · 8,007
#67
БОЖЕНА
@bozhenabozhenabozhena · 65,740
#68
BURO.
@Buro247_ru · 25,677
#69
Люди гибнут за PR
@PRnotes · 7,851
#70
KOSMETOS
@kosmetos · 15,696
#71
Серьезный подход
@tooseriousnotes · 34,119
#72
Jewellery Digest
@jeweldigest · 21,562
#73
Photography Daily
@photographydaily · 6,455
#74
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#75
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 55,148
#76
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,158,879
#77
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#78
Кинокостюм для чайников
@kinocostume · 39,210
#79
Дьявол носит H&M
@devilwearshandm · 72,684
#80
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141
#81
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 838,100
#82
Style Tricks
@styletricks · 24,185
#83
Печенюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 34,394
#84
Я так вижу
@photopupa · 14,570
#85
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 189,541
#86
Катькало
@Juliacatcalo · 24,237
#87
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 372,470
#88
Ushatava Inside
@ushatavainside · 29,259
#89
artysmarty
@artysmarty · 7,700
#90
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 318,729
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

time vs. vogue
@time_vs_vogue · 33,502
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Bon Mot
@lebonmot · 36,894
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Olga Krayzman
@olgakrayzman · 25,821
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
World Fashion Channel
@wfcru · 26,198
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 141,233
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
shoes&drinks
@shoesanddrinks · 27,042
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
The Blueprint
@theblueprintru · 96,067
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
The Blueprint News
@theblueprintnews · 72,402
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
поясни за ренессанс
@chtozakartina · 21,652
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Луис Иванович
@LIVfashionmag · 203,725
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
FASHION PAPER
@fashionpaper · 53,233
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Drunk_fashion
@drunkfashion · 40,044
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Модные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 73,280
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 107,495
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
Отказала модная железа
@Modnayazheleza · 95,173
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
superficial space cadet
@superficialspacecadet · 24,701
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Будни Гальяно
@budnigalliano · 27,853
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Jewellery Digest
@jeweldigest · 21,562
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Вишлист
@myhotelki · 48,559
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
EvelinaFashionSchool
@EvelinaFashionSchool · 82,588
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
GOSHA KARTSEV
@goshakartsev · 88,841
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
VOGUE-religion
@religion_vogue · 25,744
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
N С К У С С Т В О
@NCKYCCTBO · 31,554
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Долецкая-Doletskaya
@alionadol · 76,246
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гуд морнинг, Карл!” (@goodmorningkarl), 56,190 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodmorningkarl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.