гертруда стайн/игорь гулин: о господи, подними пузик.

Channel
гранд/канал
@canal_grande
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
1,411subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001231155141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @canal_grande |
| Created | 23 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/canal_grande |
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Гранд-канал” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 1,411 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 1,410 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 1,409 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:59 | 1,409 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 33.3%
- avg views ÷ 1,411 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 470
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.19%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (3 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,880 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Московские жители, сегодня и завтра в мастерской у Александра Повзнера возникнет стихийная экспозиция, вписанная в довольно сложное пространство действующей мастерской. Экспозиция — это: книги издательства «Носорог» и другарни «Шалаш» (что делать с книгами — известно); некоторое количество художественных объектов, странно вплетённых в образность страницы, обложки-как-маски, в ахроматичность чёрного и белого (тут им…
Ночь проводил в пещере человек-громадина
но кто же ведёт учёт смертности слизней arion vulgaris под колёсами автомобилей в последождевом подмосковье?
Вышла рецензия на «Татуировку пустотой», by Серёжа Гуськов, ин инглиш. Morozova proposes that the artist’s book moves from the flatness of the page through spatial expansion into three-dimensional form before ultimately returning to the plane of the screen. Yet both the initial stage – the imaginative space of literature and the architecture of the book – and the final one – the digital interface and networked envir…
Тиражи журнала «Носорог» (2014-2024) 1 Тираж: 707 2 Тираж: ∞ 3 Тираж: DCCXLVII 4 Тираж: 900 5 Тираж: ᕙ(`▽´)ᕗ 6 Тираж: 1458–1464 7 Тираж: некие одинокие отвлеченные числа 8 Тираж: из кунцева тянется в строгино 9 Тираж: (()) 10 Тираж: как капля в море, как ветер в поле 11 Тираж: в ловушке сна 12 Тираж: невыносимая легкость 13 Тираж: в магазинах земли 14 Тираж: входит в формы новых мод 15 Тираж: под густы…
Этель Аднан Утром после моей смерти мы встретимся в кафе но меня там не будет меня не будет. (перевод впс)
«Cоставление слов снова будет лучшим противоядием»: интервью Ульяны Мор с Катей Морозовой вокруг проекта «Книга художницы. Татуировка пустотой» Книга художника существует на пересечении литературы, визуальных искусств, архитектуры и книгоиздания. Это форма тотального арт-синтеза, самостоятельное явление культуры и пространство диалога между разными медиумами. Поэтесса и художница Ульяна Мор считает, что книга художн…
Сегодня в «Гараже» переоткрывается «Татуировка пустотой» — мы сделали ротацию некоторых объектов, и, например, запланированная ещё для первой итерации кубопоэма Риммы Герловиной «Родина» (1975) наконец на своём месте, между западом и востоком. Мы показываем оригинал, значит кубик с родиной — за стеклом и навсегда посередине, но на самом деле его нужно перемещать то вправо, то влево — в зависимости от вашего местополо…
«Как вообще выглядел мыслительный процесс автора идеи подобного оформления?» — задается вопросом автор рецензии на «Одиссею», изданную не так давно в «Носороге» и Jaromir Hladik Press, задается, само собой, с иронией, мы тоже уважаем иронию, но отвечать на вопросы иногда следует с чрезмерной серьёзностью и дотошностью. Итак, как описать тот вечер в Москве прошлым летом, в августе, когда я сидела в квартире у приятеля…
с тех пор как было принято решение вернуть букву ё — «остров» верстается с ё, и я старательно расставляю её во всех заслуженных местах — стало казаться, что каждой гласной не достаёт некоторого штриха — сверху, сбоку, снизу. Сейчас напечатав я, я-я-я-я довольно долго тревожилась, соображая, что же к ней следует добавить. Кажется, буквы и тревоги перевязаны ещё туже, чем представлялось.
Первая глава повести «Х-сон» в новом выпуске «Гало». Спасибо редакторкам и соседкам по выпуску. Подобный занавес, намалеванный кем-то, кто по неведомой причине верил в возможность податливых поверхностей принимать в себя окрашивающие вещества, оказался, само собой, фальшивкой, бутафорией, особенно, когда на нем изобразили тот город на воде. Его, как известно, прославил старый стеклодув, получивший формулу давления в…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @canal_grande. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 232,963 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…[https://nosorog.media/ «Носорог»] * канал Кати Морозовой в телеграм [https://t.me/canal_grande «Гранд-канал»] {{Премия Андрея Белого}} [[Категория:Писатели…”
read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“гранд/канал” (@canal_grande), 1,411 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canal_grande.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.