National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -1,622. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111,873–113,982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 21:17
112,116
-237
19 Sept 2026, 05:37
112,353
-16
16 Sept 2026, 16:16
112,369
-50
14 Sept 2026, 19:21
112,419
-40
13 Sept 2026, 04:01
112,459
-50
11 Sept 2026, 02:38
112,509
-162
8 Sept 2026, 03:55
112,671
-102
4 Sept 2026, 22:19
112,773
-277
3 Sept 2026, 09:28
113,050
-10
2 Sept 2026, 04:04
113,060
-100
1 Sept 2026, 00:36
113,160
-127
30 Aug 2026, 23:42
113,287
-62
30 Aug 2026, 03:14
113,349
+181
29 Aug 2026, 03:54
113,168
-43
28 Aug 2026, 01:24
113,211
-54
27 Aug 2026, 02:13
113,265
-65
26 Aug 2026, 01:19
113,330
-33
25 Aug 2026, 03:46
113,363
-62
24 Aug 2026, 00:08
113,425
-19
22 Aug 2026, 08:58
113,444
first reading
Engagement
587 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.7%
avg views ÷ 112,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
27,600
273 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
273
of 587 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held
587 (3 August 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total
7,547,540
Reactions total
279,219
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 11:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,300
Videos
≈4,900
Links
≈18,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 16m
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 116 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
623,785 reactions across 586 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
107,515
17.2%
😁
101,288
16.2%
💯
81,738
13.1%
🫡
63,097
10.1%
🤣
48,291
7.74%
😭
44,305
7.10%
🤬
38,994
6.25%
🔥
28,930
4.64%
👍
22,581
3.62%
💔
20,040
3.21%
🤡
10,832
1.74%
❤🔥
7,282
1.17%
custom 5388964525070362089
6,825
1.09%
💊
6,710
1.08%
🥰
6,501
1.04%
custom 5852726456513203317
6,373
1.02%
🙏
4,584
0.735%
😱
3,786
0.607%
🤨
3,224
0.517%
🤮
2,418
0.388%
11 further kinds
8,471
1.36%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 587 of the 587 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 625,141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 587 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
313
across the posts below
Posts paid on
39
of 587 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rozvidka_noem. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 587 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ситуацію з постачанням пального для ЗСУ повністю стабілізували після літніх затримок, — АОЗ
На вересень і жовтень необхідні обсяги пального законтрактовані повністю. Затримки виникали через нерівномірне фінансування та менші обсяги закупівель пального у червні, а також через блокаду Ормузької протоки та нестабільність на світовому паливному ринку.
Фіксуємо
Саппорт | Мерч | Донат
Развал СССР стал настоящей трагедией для десятков миллионов людей, в одночасье проснувшихся за границей, отметил российский лидер.
Оце воно кожен виступ виходить і ниє.
Я би на місці кацапів задумався стосовно їх очільника, який живе не майбутнім, а минулим.
Саппорт | Мерч | Донат
Бля йопта сюда на, фашист гранату на йопта бля на мляяя бля кхе кхе кхе.
Сука із-за цієї старої хуйні я не можу вдома посидіти рибу половити.
Саппорт | Мерч | Донат
Сьогодні загинув український пілот Марат Мамбетов — капітан та командир ланки 40-ї бригади тактичної авіації «Привид Києва», — ПС.
Під час бойового завдання його МіГ-29 збила російська ракета. Пілот катапультувався, але, на жаль, не вижив...
🫡
Саппорт | Мерч | Донат
Так вийшло, що завжди брав тачки на Донбасі після ваєнних.
Одного часу мене заєбало, що постійно треба робити ходовку, генератор, ГУР та багато інших базових речей в тачці, яку береш з рук, тому прийняв рішення пригнати тачку з європки.
Ну типу, європейці більш бережніші до тачки, ніж середньостатистичний Микола зі Словʼянська.
І знаєте, шо?
Тачку пригнав, мотор ліг через 2 тижні 🗿
Перша пригнана тачка з Європки і…
Кацап атакував Південний міст у Києві.
Не зробив вночі.
Зробив вдень, коли на мосту великий трафік цивільних.
Вкотре впевнюємося, що кацап перестав придурюватися миротворцем, бо зрозумів, що всьому світу похую, тому можна не грати бридку для нього роль.
Саппорт | Мерч | Донат
Братва та братунесси, вітаємо вас з днем захисника та захисниці!
Бажаємо вам, щоб вся ця хуйня в вашому житті нарешті завершилась і ви поїхали до додому їсти сало, цілувати жінку та спати в теплій кроваті.
Дякуємо за вашу витримку, силу та за те, що йдете туди, куди дуже сильно не хочеться!
Саппорт | Мерч | Донат
Обожнюю заходити в чати Краматорську чи Словʼянську та читати такі повідомлення.
Той Лазурний без трьох понеділків зона активних бойових дій, а вони сидять чекають, щоб приїхали комунальники під ФПВ воду зробили, бо ті 100 лишившихся людей виїжджати не хочуть🙌
Ставлю жопу — вони навіть хер комуналку платять.
Саппорт | Мерч | Донат
Потужноводськ, маємо переможців вересневого #розіграшРН ☠️
Список додаткових лотів:
1.Настільна гра Манчкін з доповненям
2.Настолка СЕНДЖЮЦУ Битва за Японію
"3. Оригінальний американьський альбом 1970 року, рок опери Ендрю Лойд Вебера - Ісус Христос суперзірка. З вокалом Іана Гілона
2 платівки, оригінальні конверти, буклет з всією оперою"
4. Український рок-гурт з Івано-Франківська KARNA, засновники стилю “гуцул ме…
Showing the 12 most recent of 587 posts we hold for @rozvidka_noem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@rozvidka_noem edited 25 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 September 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Крепко вйобану Audi A6 2006 року 3 літра дизеля після 15 хазяїв, де два з них розʼїбались на ній,67%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Інколи раз не добу, декілька хвилин потім перемикаюсь.7%
Абсолютно в рандомний момент по декілька разів на тиждень.15%
Абсолютно в рандомний момент декілька разів впродовж доби.8%
Раз на тиждень4%
Раз на місяць11%
Тільки коли відбувається стресова ситуація повʼязана з обставинами.24%
Тільки коли накриває від важкості думок.51%
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Я заєбався не бачити краю війни та все що на ній відбувається.16%
Цивільні проблеми, стосунки борги, тощо.10%
Я як мужик сам по собі заєбався постійно заганятись про те як жити завтра.22%
Доводять командири, побратими.4%
Цивільний, цікавлять результати.62%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 587 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 83 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ukrainian Special Military @ukrainianspecialmilitary · 19,913 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 29 September 2026
Дике Поле @dyke_pole · 23,154 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
✙ ATF•Anti Terror Force @atfcrew · 21,860 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 September 2026
Антисуржик @anty_surzhyk · 48,536 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Погляд Приходька @NazarPrykhodkoPlus · 22,025 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
НІП «Тиск» @TyskNIP · 29,226 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Легіон Диванної Розвідки 🇺🇦🔱 @couch_iu · 31,279 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
МАДЯР🇺🇦 @robert_magyar · 601,878 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Хроники Ридика 🫡 @hroniki_radika · 24,084 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
😇Андрій ✙ ГАВ😈 @gavlife · 28,841 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
Позивний Каппа @KappaHimera · 51,868 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
Останній Капіталіст ✙ @OstanniyCapitalist · 118,320 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Американський 🚀 піхотинець @usinfantryman1 · 91,638 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Ерудит 🇺🇦 Цікаві Опитування. @UkrErudyt · 57,394 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Євген Карась ✙ @karas_evgen · 163,514 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Офіцер @officer_33 · 182,869 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Березовий Джем @bereza_jam · 20,026 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
Орестократія @orestokratiia · 23,137 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Victory Drones @VictoryDrones2023 · 23,292 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
△ 225 ОШП △ @OSHP_225 · 23,888 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
MYROSHNYKOV @myro_shnykov · 31,081 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
National Geographic @nationalgeographicukr · 197 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
✙Resurgam✙ @resurgammmm · 55,562 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
КOVALENKO @akovalenko1989 · 60,758 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 219 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Розвідка Ноєм” (@rozvidka_noem), 112,116 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rozvidka_noem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
