Дронарі 210 ОШП спалили позицію ворожих операторів БПЛА. Два точних удари — і вороже укриття перетворилося на згарище! 🇺🇦 Facebook | Instagram | Telegram | YouTube
❤6🔥4🫡1

Channel
@polk_210
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
12,527subscribers
+5,026 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002416887793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polk_210 |
| Description | ШТУРМ НАРОДЖУЄ ПЕРЕМОГУ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polk_210 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @polk_210/7343 · this entry30 Oct 2026, 08:32 UTC | @Bratchuk_Sergey/18851130 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC | 1.00 | 4.8 hours |
| @polk_210/7347 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC | @Bratchuk_Sergey/1888963 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC | 1.00 | 31 minutes |
| @polk_210/7354 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC | @Bratchuk_Sergey/1892216 Nov 2026, 20:04 UTC | 1.00 | 12 hours |
| @polk_210/7347 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC | @gistapapapa/1285105 Nov 2026, 16:40 UTC | 1.00 | 2 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Bratchuk_Sergey | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 54 minutes | this entry (5–0) |
| @gistapapapa | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 32 hours | this entry (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 88 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 05:12 | 12,527 | -101 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 08:01 | 12,628 | -139 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 18:41 | 12,767 | +294 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:14 | 12,473 | -49 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:00 | 12,522 | -127 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:27 | 12,649 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 12,658 | -235 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:58 | 12,893 | +503 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:25 | 12,390 | -30 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:09 | 12,420 | +163 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:05 | 12,257 | -399 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 12,656 | +51 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:05 | 12,605 | -41 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 12,646 | +57 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 12,589 | +351 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:26 | 12,238 | +443 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 11,795 | -311 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:25 | 12,106 | +91 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 12,015 | +11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 12,004 | first reading |
109 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 109 (3 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 280,755 |
| Reactions total | 783 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,533 reactions across 108 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🫡 | 818 | 32.3% | |
| ❤ | 641 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 398 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 271 | 10.7% | |
| 💔 | 152 | 6.00% | |
| 🙏 | 104 | 4.11% | |
| 😢 | 58 | 2.29% | |
| ❤🔥 | 45 | 1.78% | |
| 💯 | 37 | 1.46% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.158% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.158% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.039% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,533 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (12.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Дронарі 210 ОШП спалили позицію ворожих операторів БПЛА. Два точних удари — і вороже укриття перетворилося на згарище! 🇺🇦 Facebook | Instagram | Telegram | YouTube
❤6🔥4🫡1
Козаки завжди були майстрами штурмів. Раптовість, швидкість, рішучість — вони майстерно використовували ці чинники, щоб захопити противника зненацька, прорвати оборону та нав’язати власні умови бою. Сьогодні ці традиції продовжують бійці 210 ОШП. Адже відвага, військова вправність і незламна воля до перемоги — невіддільна частина українського характеру, загартованого століттями боротьби 🇺🇦 Facebook | Instagram | Te…
👍14❤5🫡3👏1
Бувалий інструктор не просто розповідає, як треба діяти. Він пояснює теорію, показує на власному прикладі, виправляє помилки. Змушує повторювати знову і знову, доки не побачить результат. І не дозволяє халтурити навіть у дрібницях. Для новобранців 210 ОШП інструктор — це людина, яка знайомить їх з особливостями штурмової роботи та допомагає опанувати необхідні навички. Теорія тут одразу підкріплюється практикою, а…
👍17🔥6❤1🫡1
Окупанти намагаються сховатися в посадках та зруйнованих будівлях, але дронарі 210 ОШП знаходять і знищують ворога всюди. На нашій землі загарбників чекає лише безславна загибель! 🇺🇦 Facebook | Instagram | Telegram | YouTube
🔥20🫡8❤3👍2
Історична операція пілотів FPV! Лицарі «складають» дронами підʼїзди з росіянами. Зачистка багатоповерхівки з противником — одна з найважчих задач у міських боях. Однак Лицарі 28-ї бригади знайшли доволі незвичне рішення. Дізнавшись від розвідників про щонайменше одну групу росіян у будинку, ми стали планувати операцію з головною метою — максимум ефективності і мінімум ризику для людей. Тому замість піхотних зачисто…
❤20🔥12🫡3
Ще на початку десятиліття важко було уявити, наскільки важливу роль відіграватимуть БПЛА на полі бою. Українці стали одними з першопрохідців їхнього масового застосування, докорінно змінивши характер сучасної війни. Завдяки винахідливості, майстерності та досвіду наших дронарів безпілотники перетворилися на один із ключових інструментів розвідки, спостереження та ураження. І за кожним успішним вильотом стоять знання…
❤19🔥5🫡3
Хоробро йти вперед, діяти рішуче, долати опір ворога та виконувати завдання у найскладніших умовах. Десантники завжди були і залишаються однією з головних ударних сил українського війська. Вітаємо побратимів із професійним святом! Дякуємо за мужність, стійкість та бойову майстерність! 🇺🇦 Facebook | Instagram | Telegram | YouTube
❤22🫡7👍2
🗣 «Принцип “моя хата скраю” на цій війні не діє. Тому що твоя “хата скраю” дуже скоро може стати не твоєю». Вікторія «Тоторі» — бойовий медик 210 ОШП. До повномасштабного вторгнення 13 років працювала перукаркою. Із початком великої війни долучилася до волонтерського центру, а восени 2022 року стала до лав війська. До медицини стосунку не мала. Такмед, фармакологію та інші необхідні знання опановувала вже у війську…
❤🔥17❤15🫡7👍4
Ще 25 ворожих «Молній» на рахунку зенітників 210 ОШП. Бійці вистежують російські безпілотники й ліквідують їх прямо в повітрі. Це наше небо! 🇺🇦 Facebook | Instagram | Telegram | YouTube
🔥23🫡6👍4
На початку листопада 1068 року син Ярослава Мудрого, князь Святослав Ярославич, розгромив військо половців біля Чернігова. За літописом, три тисячі воїнів Русі-України виступили проти дванадцятитисячного війська противника та перемогли. Тисячу років тому наші предки вже доводили, що чисельна перевага не гарантує успіху. Сьогодні українське військо знову демонструє, що рішучість, майстерність та незламна воля здатн…
🫡19❤15🤔3
БМ-21 «Град» — перевірена десятиліттями зброя, яка й сьогодні ефективно нищить окупантів. За лічені секунди бойова машина випускає цілий шквал смертоносного заліза. Артилеристи 210 ОШП добре знають можливості цієї зброї та вправно застосовують її проти загарбників! 🇺🇦 Facebook | Instagram | Telegram | YouTube
🔥20👍4❤3🫡3
Ворогу не сховатися від пильного ока та влучних ударів дронарів 210 ОШП! Схованки противника, вогневі точки та склади БК перетворюються на попіл. Виявляємо кожну ціль і ліквідовуємо окупантів без жалю! 🇺🇦 Facebook | Instagram | Telegram | YouTube
❤23🔥9🫡6
Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @polk_210. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@polk_210 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“210 окремий штурмовий полк” (@polk_210), 12,527 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polk_210.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.