Вологі мрії русні закінчуються там, де українці дають їм пизди.
😁3,200🔥778🙏144👍85😈70🤯29🤬14😢2

Channel
@stanislav_osman
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
289,232subscribers
-4,831 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001308729127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stanislav_osman |
| Description | Мер Генічеська Бунятов Станіслав Позивний «Осмáн» Нікнейм для запрошення @stanislav_osman Співпраця / звʼязок з автором - @stanislavosman_bot Розблокувати/реклама - @stas_osman THBuHjmLoqjZb71nBR8YwjxKkSd4xuzcoF |
| Created | 10 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stanislav_osman |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 289,232 | -144 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 289,376 | -140 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 289,516 | -172 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 289,688 | -287 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:14 | 289,975 | -494 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:54 | 290,469 | -335 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 290,804 | -144 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 290,948 | -194 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:25 | 291,142 | -180 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 291,322 | -100 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 291,422 | -43 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 291,465 | -235 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 291,700 | -34 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 291,734 | -34 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 291,768 | -61 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 291,829 | -86 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 291,915 | -164 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 292,079 | -122 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:59 | 292,201 | -150 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 292,351 | first reading |
143 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 143 (30 July 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,269,400 |
| Reactions total | 368,503 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 03:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
868,428 reactions across 136 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 184,588 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 149,371 | 17.2% | |
| 🤬 | 132,793 | 15.3% | |
| 💯 | 115,003 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 99,545 | 11.5% | |
| 😢 | 48,800 | 5.62% | |
| 🙏 | 46,936 | 5.40% | |
| 🫡 | 34,618 | 3.99% | |
| 💔 | 19,540 | 2.25% | |
| 🤯 | 19,071 | 2.20% | |
| 🥰 | 7,340 | 0.845% | |
| 😐 | 5,252 | 0.605% | |
| 😱 | 3,861 | 0.445% | |
| 😈 | 1,049 | 0.121% | |
| custom 5352750902723760579 | 661 | 0.076% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 143 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 910,177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 143 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вологі мрії русні закінчуються там, де українці дають їм пизди.
😁3,200🔥778🙏144👍85😈70🤯29🤬14😢2
«Моршинською», якою володів російський олігарх Фрідман, тепер керують українці. Над проєктом почала працювати досвідчена команда, учасники якої неодноразово проявляли себе в співпраці з армією. Тепер будемо пити воду не фінансуючи підарів:)
🔥3,450👍1,230🥰120😁97🙏27🤬23🤯13😈4
До Дня захисту дітей волонтерська організація «Щаслива дитина - щасливий я» відкриває великий соціальний проєкт «Діти під мирним небом». Це буде не просто свято. Це — 4 великі сцени у 4 містах України, 27 дитячих закладів і 1600 дітей, для яких ми хочемо створити день, сповнений радості, турботи та щирих емоцій. Це свято для: • дітей-сиріт; • дітей, позбавлених батьківського піклування; • дітей з особливими освітн…
👍632🙏339🔥48🥰27😁14🤬4💔3🤯3
Круте відео від бригади «Лють» - «Що, якби росії не було». Думаю, багато хто його не бачив, тому раджу подивитися. Головне не просльозитися.
🔥3,460😢731💔367👍208😁42🥰41🙏38🤬12
В Олешках та сусідніх населених пунктах ситуація стає все гірше. Окрім кричущої гуманітарної катастрофи насувається холод, жодної людяності в бік місцевого населення, яке нещодавно росіяни змушували отримувати паспорти та голосувати на референдумах, немає. Певний час місцеві ходили за продуктами до Раденська, оминаючи міни, які реагують на рух та метал, тому йти доводилося дуже повільно один за одним, подекуди не в…
😢4,330🤬3,360😁568🙏243💔149👍35😱21🤯6
Зима буде важкою, помирайте поки тепло, бо потім землю копати важко😂
😁4,950🔥418👍226😢204🤬68😈22😱22🙏15
Зміна підходів до управління військами дає свої позитивні плоди. Це не лише наслідок заміни головнокомандувача, а і результат того, що вдалося крізь піт і сльози продавити під час каденції Сирського.
🔥3,790🙏1,700👍426😁40🥰22🤯6😱4🤬3
Є два варіанти закінчення війни. Один дуже поганий, інший такий, який може підняти країни до величі - Трамп. З великими чи короткими перервами ми воюватимемо з росією до кінця існування їхньої імперської нації. Щоб ця війна закінчилася, кожна сторона має «зліпити» для народів свою «перемогу». На фоні постійних ударів в глиб росії путін з цим впоратися не може, і судячи по наративах, які несе в свої тухлі маси, не …
👍4,430🙏739🔥297😁135🤬36🤯21😢13😈9
Бідолаха не захотіла мати позивний «Муза - 2» і почала топити чувака, якому допомагала «абагащаца» і вивозити бабки закордон. Поки найобував інших людей, все було ок, коли наїбав її - став аферистом. «Я жила з ним і не знала. Де брав гроші не питала. Патпішитєсь на мєня, я - жертва»
🥰6,650😁3,700👍280🤬194🤯23😱23😢12🔥6
Західніше від Покровська, користуючись перевагою у кількості живої сили, ворог намагається інфільтруватися та нокопичуватися для подальших штурмових дій в напрямку населених пунктів. Окрім піхоти, подекуди намагаються задіювати ЛАТ, мотоцикли та квадроцикли. «Зеленка» та авіація противника ускладнює безперервний процес виявлення та знищення противника, тим не менше переважну більшість цілей хлопці відпрацьовують вда…
🙏3,700🤬829👍191😢58🔥37😁15🥰7😱5
Мобілізація в росії почалася задовго до виборів. Командування обох сторін чудово усвідомлює переваги наступаючої сторони під час «зеленки». Залежно від місцевості втрати наступаючої сторони суттєво зростають, тому зараз їхнє основне завдання - посилити підрозділи і прорватися в напрямку урбанізованої місцевості на ключових напрямках, щоб зберігати й нарощувати темпи наступу в холодний період року.
🤬3,430🙏445👍90🤯61😢40😁33😱9🔥5
Кличко зібрав нову касту ухилянтів? Чи там все ж є пару ветеранів, щоб відбілювати толпу, функцію якої має виконувати поліція?
🤬4,960😱240😁142🤯112👍36😢16😈8🥰7
Showing the 12 most recent of 143 posts we hold for @stanislav_osman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@stanislav_osman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 64 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 533 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Говорять Снайпер ꑭ” (@stanislav_osman), 289,232 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stanislav_osman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.