Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
132,000 average views per post against 185,362 subscribers — an engagement rate of 71.4%. Across the 6,744 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,003–316,195 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.14% and 14.3%, with a median of 6.00%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (16 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Posts measured
31 of 31 published in the window (0 exact, 31 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
4,104,200
Mature posts only
73.0% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -789. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185,244–186,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 20:07
185,362
-49
13 Aug 2026, 12:47
185,411
-111
12 Aug 2026, 14:34
185,522
-81
11 Aug 2026, 12:23
185,603
-78
10 Aug 2026, 13:17
185,681
-127
9 Aug 2026, 11:52
185,808
-153
8 Aug 2026, 11:10
185,961
-92
7 Aug 2026, 11:15
186,053
-50
6 Aug 2026, 11:10
186,103
-48
6 Aug 2026, 01:50
186,151
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
71.4%
avg views ÷ 185,362 subscribers
Avg views / post
132,000
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
31 (21 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
4,104,200
Reactions total
172,157
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,300
Videos
≈727
Links
≈5,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
172,157 reactions across 31 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
53,860
31.3%
❤
36,739
21.3%
🤣
23,356
13.6%
🙏
18,686
10.9%
😢
12,384
7.19%
👍
8,581
4.98%
🔥
6,967
4.05%
🤬
5,112
2.97%
🫡
1,690
0.982%
🤔
1,348
0.783%
💔
920
0.534%
custom 5314614887375192869
528
0.307%
😁
342
0.199%
👀
327
0.19%
😡
295
0.171%
😭
267
0.155%
💊
204
0.118%
🙈
70
0.041%
🤝
52
0.03%
🍾
48
0.028%
24 further kinds
381
0.221%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172,157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
96
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 31 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
61
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @officer_33. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
По DOT-Chain ніби все круто, якби не декілька важливих і болючих «але»:
1. Цю історію потрібно масштабовувати та виводити близько 80% всього забезпечення через цю програму, адже більшість отримують БпЛА від «старшого начальника» по розподілу.
2. Необхідність збільшення фінансування на всі інші військові формування, окрім ЗСУ, бо наприклад в НГУ ситуація набагато гірша і в результаті по DOT-Chain отримують взагалі к…
425 ОШП «Скеля» ніхто не буде розформовувати, адже підрозділ перебуватиме лише у оперативному підпорядкуванні 1 КНГУ «Азов», командування якого здійснюватиме управління підрозділом в ході бойових дій, при чому вся структура 425 та адміністративне підпорядкування залишиться в незмінній формі.
Однозначно це може свідчити про крах всієї концепції штурмових військ, які канули у небуття разом зі своїм господарем. Сподіва…
По відгукам молодші командири деяких підрозділів 425 ОШП «Скеля» мають доволі таки позитивне враження від взаємодії з представниками 1 корпусу «Азов», дещо навіть здивовані певними підходами у ставленні до особового складу під час бойової роботи.
Банально, на них ніхто не забив болт, як більшість робить з приданими підрозділами.
Свічку не тримав під час всіх цих скандальних подій у «Скелі», але сам факт такого приєм…
Ну що ж, будемо тепер знати, скільки шахедів куди прилетіло)
На мою думку, доволі таки правильне рішення, адже це абсолютно нічого не давало населенню, окрім передчасної паніки в суспільстві.
Будемо відверті, кожного з населення зараз найбільше турбує власний регіон та власна домівка, кожен бажає бути обізнаним за свій край, адже якщо шахед прилетів у його будинок, при тому, що ППО збили 99/100 шахедів, ситуація ві…
На Костянтинівському напрямку ситуація доволі важка, не буду розписувати купу тексту про те, захопив противник Костянтинівку чи ні, скажу лише, що підари намагаються охопити з флангів Олексієво-Дружківку - для того, щоб підійти впритул до Дружківки, яка знаходиться на висоті, адже пробиватись до неї влоб - навіть для підарів така собі ідея)
Тактична дрібна інфільтрація - вайб війни 2026-го року, адже піхотні позиції…
До речі, «Азов» показав вам один з банзай-підвозів на Добропільському напрямку, коли противник перейшов до тактики шикування в колону з 30-40 ЛАТ, висуваючись з точки збору і розʼїжджаючись в різні боки, з метою, щоб хоч щось доїхало до позицій.
Через декілька тижнів ворог відмовився від подібної тактики на Добропільському напрямку, через щоденні розйоби та дефіцит ресурсів. І прикол в тому, що наразі вийшло на біль…
Не робіть перемоги з кількості запущених БпЛА на рашку, адже їхні шахеди нон-стопом залітають не в менших, а то і більших кількостях буквально кожного дня…
Противник пристосовується, також переймає тактику знищення складської інфраструктури, тому потрібно завжди думати на декілька кроків вперед, адже як тільки ми діємо симетрично в методах війни - вони автоматично набувають переваги за рахунок набагато більшого ресу…
Сьогодні противник цілий день нон-стопом запускав ударні БпЛА типу Молнія в сторону міста Павлоград, намагаючись завдавати ударам по будь-якому транспорту, в тому числі і цивільному.
Будемо спостерігати як в подальшому піде така тенденція, але дзвіночок доволі тривожний, адже давно відомо про успішні напрацювання підарів з меш-мережею та розробку власного терміналу по типу старлінк. При тому, що проти останнього у н…
Це дуже важливо, бо дуже давно обіцяв цим хлопцям😢
Підрозділ моїх побратимів - 1 ББпС «Хижаки Висот» 🪢59-ої ОШБр СБС просять допомогти з закупівлею обладнання та матеріалів для майстерні.
Наразі 90% всіх дронів не йдуть готовими з коробки і щоб воно почало реально ефективно літати та когось чи щось вбивати - потрібно проганяти через майстерню і вливати купу грошей на обладнання і розхідники, що військові роботи зав…
Знаєте, РНБО останнім часом напевно перетворилася в тусу ровних тіпів, яких зняли зі своїх посад, але і на смітник викинути шкода, бо може пригодитися))
Взагалі якось багато всіляких ставок, рад, нарад і тд, але не зрозуміло, що кожна з них вирішує по факту; купа посад, суєти і тд, але на виході все якось пічально.
Офіцер ✙ | Підписатись
До речі задумувавсь хтось, що нам також працювати над засобами РЕБ проти засобів, подібним терміналам Starlink?)
Занадто швидко нас розслабив та попустив той факт, що противнику вимкнули Starlink і все круто, бо вони не використовують, а ми можемо. Проте ворог швидко адаптувався: розробив РЕБ проти старлінку та більше того - вони викатують свій аналог старлінка; і повірте, ми знову будемо кусати лікті, коли вони вст…
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @officer_33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@officer_33 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 39,157 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sazonov / Official @Kirilovolodimirovich · 106,648 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Жорін /// Третій армійський корпус @MaksymZhorin · 108,268 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Розвідка Ноєм @rozvidka_noem · 113,522 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Євген Карась ✙ @karas_evgen · 165,940 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Aeris Rimor @AerisRimor · 155,569 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Фашик Донецький @gistapapapa · 106,180 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
ДОХЛІ РАСІЯНЄ ✙ @dokhlyye_rossiyane · 105,177 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
TERRA Розвідка Інфо @terraops · 104,495 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
Бросок Мангуста 🇺🇦 @brosok_mangusta · 118,527 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Спортивна назва @sportvukr · 104,704 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Збройні Сили України. Війна з окупантами @zsuwar · 112,574 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
✙ Перша приватна мемарня @privatnamemarnya · 116,670 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Русский Добровольческий Корпус @rvc_army · 114,843 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Телебачення Торонто @torontotv · 112,478 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Радіо Свобода @svoboda_radio · 101,130 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
ПН | Преступности.НЕТ @newspn · 100,743 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
BRAMA @brama_channel · 112,331 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine @itarmyofukraine2022 · 106,814 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Михаил Шейтельман з Києва @sheitelman · 118,246 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
TLk News @tlknewsua · 633,302 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
hromadske @hromadske_ua · 101,309 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Женьок Вещає… @ZhenyokSay · 141,777 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Суспільне Харків @suspilne_kharkiv · 108,441 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
SUMYLIKE TG @sumyliketop · 152,473 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Офіцер” (@officer_33), 185,362 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/officer_33.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.