Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Офіцер

@officer_33

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

185,362subscribers

-789 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001632127793
TypeChannel
Username@officer_33
DescriptionОсобистий блог Старший лейтенант Сил оборони України Позивний «Алекс» Зв’язок з автором @unddeerr
Created21 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/officer_33

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

132,000 average views per post against 185,362 subscribers — an engagement rate of 71.4%. Across the 6,744 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,003–316,195 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.14% and 14.3%, with a median of 6.00%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (16 July 2026 15 August 2026)
Posts measured31 of 31 published in the window (0 exact, 31 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled4,104,200
Mature posts only73.0% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers185,362 measured 14 August 2026
Cohortb100000 · 6,744 channels · p10 0.699% · p25 2.14% · p50 6.00% · p75 14.3% · p90 27.1%
Position in cohort99.362th percentile · 11.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.16% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageUkrainian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

185,362186,151185,756.56 August 2026 — 186,151 subscribers6 August 2026 — 186,103 subscribers7 August 2026 — 186,053 subscribers8 August 2026 — 185,961 subscribers9 August 2026 — 185,808 subscribers10 August 2026 — 185,681 subscribers11 August 2026 — 185,603 subscribers12 August 2026 — 185,522 subscribers13 August 2026 — 185,411 subscribers14 August 2026 — 185,362 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -789. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185,244–186,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:07185,362-49
13 Aug 2026, 12:47185,411-111
12 Aug 2026, 14:34185,522-81
11 Aug 2026, 12:23185,603-78
10 Aug 2026, 13:17185,681-127
9 Aug 2026, 11:52185,808-153
8 Aug 2026, 11:10185,961-92
7 Aug 2026, 11:15186,053-50
6 Aug 2026, 11:10186,103-48
6 Aug 2026, 01:50186,151first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.4%
avg views ÷ 185,362 subscribers
Avg views / post
132,000
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held31 (21 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total4,104,200
Reactions total172,157
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,300
Videos
727
Links
5,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

172,157 reactions across 31 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯53,86031.3%
36,73921.3%
🤣23,35613.6%
🙏18,68610.9%
😢12,3847.19%
👍8,5814.98%
🔥6,9674.05%
🤬5,1122.97%
🫡1,6900.982%
🤔1,3480.783%
💔9200.534%
custom 53146148873751928695280.307%
😁3420.199%
👀3270.19%
😡2950.171%
😭2670.155%
💊2040.118%
🙈700.041%
🤝520.03%
🍾480.028%
24 further kinds3810.221%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172,157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
96
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 31 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
61
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @officer_33. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC≈44,400 views1,423 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

По DOT-Chain ніби все круто, якби не декілька важливих і болючих «але»: 1. Цю історію потрібно масштабовувати та виводити близько 80% всього забезпечення через цю програму, адже більшість отримують БпЛА від «старшого начальника» по розподілу. 2. Необхідність збільшення фінансування на всі інші військові формування, окрім ЗСУ, бо наприклад в НГУ ситуація набагато гірша і в результаті по DOT-Chain отримують взагалі к

👍962🙏304💯6151🤔23😢17🤣5

14 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC≈65,500 views3,452 reactionsread 15 August 2026

425 ОШП «Скеля» ніхто не буде розформовувати, адже підрозділ перебуватиме лише у оперативному підпорядкуванні 1 КНГУ «Азов», командування якого здійснюватиме управління підрозділом в ході бойових дій, при чому вся структура 425 та адміністративне підпорядкування залишиться в незмінній формі. Однозначно це може свідчити про крах всієї концепції штурмових військ, які канули у небуття разом зі своїм господарем. Сподіва

2,170👍757🙏352👀62🤔48custom 531461488737519286919🤣18💊8

13 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC≈75,200 views4,007 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026

По відгукам молодші командири деяких підрозділів 425 ОШП «Скеля» мають доволі таки позитивне враження від взаємодії з представниками 1 корпусу «Азов», дещо навіть здивовані певними підходами у ставленні до особового складу під час бойової роботи. Банально, на них ніхто не забив болт, як більшість робить з приданими підрозділами. Свічку не тримав під час всіх цих скандальних подій у «Скелі», але сам факт такого приєм

2,540👍798💯337🤔146🙏122🫡22💊17😁16

12 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC≈81,900 views3,157 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Ну що ж, будемо тепер знати, скільки шахедів куди прилетіло) На мою думку, доволі таки правильне рішення, адже це абсолютно нічого не давало населенню, окрім передчасної паніки в суспільстві. Будемо відверті, кожного з населення зараз найбільше турбує власний регіон та власна домівка, кожен бажає бути обізнаним за свій край, адже якщо шахед прилетів у його будинок, при тому, що ППО збили 99/100 шахедів, ситуація ві

1,480💯1,120👍185🤔140🤬96🤣42🙈29💊28

11 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC≈90,200 views3,848 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

На Костянтинівському напрямку ситуація доволі важка, не буду розписувати купу тексту про те, захопив противник Костянтинівку чи ні, скажу лише, що підари намагаються охопити з флангів Олексієво-Дружківку - для того, щоб підійти впритул до Дружківки, яка знаходиться на висоті, адже пробиватись до неї влоб - навіть для підарів така собі ідея) Тактична дрібна інфільтрація - вайб війни 2026-го року, адже піхотні позиції

🙏2,900😢515😡165🫡9459🤬47😁21custom 531461488737519286919

10 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC≈103,000 views3,463 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

До речі, «Азов» показав вам один з банзай-підвозів на Добропільському напрямку, коли противник перейшов до тактики шикування в колону з 30-40 ЛАТ, висуваючись з точки збору і розʼїжджаючись в різні боки, з метою, щоб хоч щось доїхало до позицій. Через декілька тижнів ворог відмовився від подібної тактики на Добропільському напрямку, через щоденні розйоби та дефіцит ресурсів. І прикол в тому, що наразі вийшло на біль

1,760🙏1,060🤔331👍138🤬66🫡51😢24custom 531461488737519286920

9 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC≈110,000 views9,606 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Не робіть перемоги з кількості запущених БпЛА на рашку, адже їхні шахеди нон-стопом залітають не в менших, а то і більших кількостях буквально кожного дня… Противник пристосовується, також переймає тактику знищення складської інфраструктури, тому потрібно завжди думати на декілька кроків вперед, адже як тільки ми діємо симетрично в методах війни - вони автоматично набувають переваги за рахунок набагато більшого ресу

💯4,410🤣4,370🙏52590👍77😢56custom 531461488737519286929😐21

8 Aug 2026, 23:54 UTC≈117,000 views7,778 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сьогодні противник цілий день нон-стопом запускав ударні БпЛА типу Молнія в сторону міста Павлоград, намагаючись завдавати ударам по будь-якому транспорту, в тому числі і цивільному. Будемо спостерігати як в подальшому піде така тенденція, але дзвіночок доволі тривожний, адже давно відомо про успішні напрацювання підарів з меш-мережею та розробку власного терміналу по типу старлінк. При тому, що проти останнього у н

🤣4,410😢1,750🤬1,060🙏37455🤔50💯32custom 531461488737519286922

8 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC≈102,000 views1,589 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Потужно подякував🤝

1,300👍204🤝28🙏16🔥14💊12🆒6😇5

8 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC≈111,000 views1,912 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Це дуже важливо, бо дуже давно обіцяв цим хлопцям😢 Підрозділ моїх побратимів - 1 ББпС «Хижаки Висот» 🪢59-ої ОШБр СБС просять допомогти з закупівлею обладнання та матеріалів для майстерні. Наразі 90% всіх дронів не йдуть готовими з коробки і щоб воно почало реально ефективно літати та когось чи щось вбивати - потрібно проганяти через майстерню і вливати купу грошей на обладнання і розхідники, що військові роботи зав

1,310🙏400🫡94👍55❤‍🔥29🤣8🌭5🤬4

7 Aug 2026, 23:23 UTC≈106,000 views5,189 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Знаєте, РНБО останнім часом напевно перетворилася в тусу ровних тіпів, яких зняли зі своїх посад, але і на смітник викинути шкода, бо може пригодитися)) Взагалі якось багато всіляких ставок, рад, нарад і тд, але не зрозуміло, що кожна з них вирішує по факту; купа посад, суєти і тд, але на виході все якось пічально. Офіцер ✙ | Підписатись

💯4,760🤬195👍7646😁36🙈27🙏15custom 531461488737519286913

5 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC≈132,000 views4,958 reactionsread 15 August 2026

До речі задумувавсь хтось, що нам також працювати над засобами РЕБ проти засобів, подібним терміналам Starlink?) Занадто швидко нас розслабив та попустив той факт, що противнику вимкнули Starlink і все круто, бо вони не використовують, а ми можемо. Проте ворог швидко адаптувався: розробив РЕБ проти старлінку та більше того - вони викатують свій аналог старлінка; і повірте, ми знову будемо кусати лікті, коли вони вст

💯3,980🙏588😢151102👍42😁36custom 531461488737519286923🤬14

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @officer_33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@officer_33 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 39,157 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Говорять Снайпер ꑭ
@stanislav_osman · 292,866
#1
Бавовна
@ukrbavovna · 644,927
#2
Лачен пише
@lachentyt · 1,563,312
#3
Бахмутський Демон 👹
@bahshiddemon · 171,886
#4
Думки Фронтовика ∆
@dumky_frontovyka · 54,698
#5
Розвідка Ноєм
@rozvidka_noem · 113,522
#6
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦
@deepstateua · 765,624
#7
🐻Балу HUB🐻
@BaluHUB777 · 56,134
#8
YIGAL LEVIN
@yigal_levin · 220,961
#9
БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС
@ButusovPlus · 347,961
#10
Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
@kpszsu · 895,176
#11
✙ 🔼Вертикаль
@vert2026 · 120,560
#12
Дивізіон-«ТІВАЗ»
@tivaz_artillery · 38,694
#13
∆✙🍒Гнила черешня🇺🇦✙∆
@gnilayachereha · 428,674
#14
Реальна Війна | Україна | Новини
@voynareal · 1,522,155
#15
Оперативний ЗСУ
@operativnoZSU · 370,117
#16
Євген Карась ✙
@karas_evgen · 165,940
#17
INSIDER UA
@insiderukr · 2,170,486
#18
UKRAINIAN MILITANT
@ukrainian_militant · 63,003
#19
ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS
@Tsaplienko · 322,938
#20
Український Наступ | #УкрТг ∆
@ukrnastup · 129,601
#21
Розвідник ✙
@rozvidnuk_1 · 50,994
#22
Всевидящее ОКО: Україна | Політика
@oko_ua · 1,145,366
#23
Третій армійський корпус
@ab3army · 275,759
#24
InformNapalm
@informnapalm · 132,255
#25
Легіон Диванної Розвідки 🇺🇦🔱 #fedorov
@couch_iu · 29,572
#26
Жорін /// Третій армійський корпус
@MaksymZhorin · 108,268
#27
War Zone ✙ ➔ △ #ISupportFedorov
@WarZoneInc · 34,473
#28
Око Гора ✙ Новости и аналитика
@oko_gora · 66,838
#29
СКАДОВСЬКИЙ ЗАХИСНИК
@defender_skadovsk · 41,334
#30
Александр Коваленко
@zloyodessit · 80,741
#31
Фашик Донецький
@gistapapapa · 106,180
#32
Шрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 96,031
#33
Головне управління розвідки МО України
@DIUkraine · 226,504
#34
Останній Капіталіст ✙
@OstanniyCapitalist · 118,886
#35
СИРСЬКИЙ
@osirskiy · 50,877
#36
✙ Перша приватна мемарня
@privatnamemarnya · 116,670
#37
ДОХЛІ РАСІЯНЄ ✙
@dokhlyye_rossiyane · 105,177
#38
Volodymyr Zolkin
@volodymyrzolkin · 180,801
#39
Zvиздец Мангусту
@zvizdecmanhustu · 68,849
#40
Американський 🚀 піхотинець
@usinfantryman1 · 92,792
#41
🇺🇦💥Бахмутський Балу 💥🇺🇦
@bakhmutskyy · 39,379
#42
Мілітарний
@milinua · 71,866
#43
✙ Хамелеон
@xameleon_ua · 25,417
#44
Всевидящее ОКО 18 ✙
@oko18_ukr · 307,460
#45
Батальйон «Монако» | Україна | Новини
@batalionmonako · 716,107
#46
Dnipro Osint ⟨ Гарбуз ⟩
@DniproOfficial · 34,063
#47
Позивний Каппа
@KappaHimera · 53,060
#48
Цензор.НЕТ | Новини України та світу, війна та аналітика
@censor_net · 183,125
#49
In Factum
@in_factum · 44,552
#50
Хуйовий Харків 🇺🇦 Хуевый Харьков
@huyovy_kharkiv · 466,118
#51
Україна Online: Новини | Політика
@UaOnlii · 1,562,229
#52
ГОНЧАРЕНКО
@oleksiihoncharenko · 212,761
#53
Military Journal ✙
@MiliTJournal · 11,226
#54
Николаевский Ванёк
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,667,294
#55
monitor
@war_monitor · 965,184
#56
Скринька Пандори
@pandoras_box_ua · 159,035
#57
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 303,944
#58
Труха⚡️Україна
@truexanewsua · 3,169,157
#59
Маршал 🔥✊️🇺🇦
@marshalvdv · 97,291
#60
ОГо!
@OGoMono · 662,528
#61
Сергій FLASH | Про технології
@serhii_flash · 166,190
#62
Денис Казанський
@kazansky2017 · 149,701
#63
INVASION
@inslandd · 39,370
#64
МАДЯР🇺🇦
@robert_magyar · 600,105
#65
Анатолій Штефан "Штірліц"
@a_shtirlitz · 139,761
#66
КOVALENKO
@akovalenko1989 · 61,575
#67
Ukraine context
@ukraine_context · 92,156
#68
Zelenskiy / Official
@v_zelenskiy_official · 673,254
#69
Реальний Київ | Украина
@kievreal1 · 1,535,796
#70
NEXTA Live
@nexta_live · 761,471
#71
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,710
#72
Новинач
@novinach · 139,215
#73
Крымский ветер
@Crimeanwind · 224,699
#74
Тарас Григорович повідомляє
@tgp_news · 57,545
#75
ҐРУНТ
@gruntmedia · 144,977
#76
Андрій Єрмак 🇺🇦
@ermaka2022 · 84,263
#77
Marmuletik🇺🇦
@marmuletik · 51,114
#78
1-й корпус НГУ «Азов»
@azov_media · 241,163
#79
Валерій Залужний
@Zaluzhnui · 225,347
#80
Pravda Gerashchenko
@Pravda_Gerashchenko · 327,135
#81
Україна Сейчас | УС: новини, політика
@u_now · 1,403,611
#82
Лебидло
@lebigaa · 427,391
#83
УНИАН - новости Украины | война с Россией | новини України | війна з Росією | УНІАН
@uniannet · 710,746
#84
ЧВК Б.О.М.Ж🫡
@chvkbomjj · 12,181
#85
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,007,135
#86
Бро скинув мем
@bromeeems · 318,816
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sazonov / Official
@Kirilovolodimirovich · 106,648
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Жорін /// Третій армійський корпус
@MaksymZhorin · 108,268
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Розвідка Ноєм
@rozvidka_noem · 113,522
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Євген Карась ✙
@karas_evgen · 165,940
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Aeris Rimor
@AerisRimor · 155,569
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Фашик Донецький
@gistapapapa · 106,180
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
ДОХЛІ РАСІЯНЄ ✙
@dokhlyye_rossiyane · 105,177
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
TERRA Розвідка Інфо
@terraops · 104,495
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
Бросок Мангуста 🇺🇦
@brosok_mangusta · 118,527
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Спортивна назва
@sportvukr · 104,704
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Збройні Сили України. Війна з окупантами
@zsuwar · 112,574
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
✙ Перша приватна мемарня
@privatnamemarnya · 116,670
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Русский Добровольческий Корпус
@rvc_army · 114,843
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Телебачення Торонто
@torontotv · 112,478
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Радіо Свобода
@svoboda_radio · 101,130
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
ПН | Преступности.НЕТ
@newspn · 100,743
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
BRAMA
@brama_channel · 112,331
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine
@itarmyofukraine2022 · 106,814
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Михаил Шейтельман з Києва
@sheitelman · 118,246
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
TLk News
@tlknewsua · 633,302
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
hromadske
@hromadske_ua · 101,309
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Женьок Вещає…
@ZhenyokSay · 141,777
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Суспільне Харків
@suspilne_kharkiv · 108,441
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
SUMYLIKE TG
@sumyliketop · 152,473
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Офіцер” (@officer_33), 185,362 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/officer_33.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.