Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хлопці з Лісу ✙

Channel

Хлопці з Лісу ✙

@hlopci_z_lisu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,988subscribers

-210 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225662979
TypeChannel
Username@hlopci_z_lisu
Created16 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hlopci_z_lisu

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,98112,19812,089.56 August 2026 — 12,198 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,198 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,193 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,185 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,178 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,176 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,173 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,170 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,169 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,160 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,146 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,134 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,126 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,116 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,121 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,114 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,104 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,089 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,084 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,081 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,075 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,069 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,063 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,057 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,059 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,052 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,033 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,027 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,003 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,996 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,992 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,981 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,988 subscribers11,9886 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -210. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,948–12,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:5911,988+7
17 Sept 2026, 03:3911,981-11
15 Sept 2026, 06:0011,992-4
13 Sept 2026, 16:1711,996-7
12 Sept 2026, 00:0112,003-24
9 Sept 2026, 18:1812,027-6
6 Sept 2026, 08:4112,033-19
2 Sept 2026, 16:3712,052-7
1 Sept 2026, 17:4512,059+2
31 Aug 2026, 16:3812,057-6
30 Aug 2026, 14:5512,063-6
29 Aug 2026, 13:1412,069-6
28 Aug 2026, 11:2812,075-6
27 Aug 2026, 11:4912,081-3
26 Aug 2026, 12:0712,084-5
25 Aug 2026, 12:5912,089-15
24 Aug 2026, 13:0312,104-10
22 Aug 2026, 23:0512,114-7
21 Aug 2026, 14:1812,121+5
20 Aug 2026, 12:5212,116first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.4%
avg views ÷ 11,988 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,010
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held53 (22 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total72,170
Reactions total3,609
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,539 reactions across 52 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🫡1,65715.7%
😁1,47814.0%
👍1,37013.0%
1,31612.5%
🔥1,06810.1%
🤣1,0489.94%
💯8858.40%
🤬4774.53%
😢3173.01%
🤝1341.27%
🙏1211.15%
💔1010.958%
🥰870.826%
👏800.759%
710.674%
👀530.503%
🤯430.408%
👌400.38%
🙈290.275%
🤷210.199%
27 further kinds1431.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,539 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:39 UTC≈3,940 views257 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

ГОЙДАААААА

🤣175🔥4121👍9😁7🍾4

31 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈4,460 views110 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Минулого разу ці патчі розібрали за пів дня. То ми зробили ще! Налітай.

🥰60🔥36👍8🤷5👏1

31 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTCviews —

Хлопці з Лісу ✙ pinned «Що? Жива зустріч підписників каналу Хлопці з лісу. Коли: 6 вересня, вечір. Де? Київ. (Якщо вважати лівий берег Києвом) Як потрапити? Зареєструватися тут: https://forms.gle/KZqHKWqUVLXjBds38 А потім чекати деталі в приват. В програмі: кава, патчі та офігітєльні…»

31 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈3,400 views85 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Що? Жива зустріч підписників каналу Хлопці з лісу. Коли: 6 вересня, вечір. Де? Київ. (Якщо вважати лівий берег Києвом) Як потрапити? Зареєструватися тут: https://forms.gle/KZqHKWqUVLXjBds38 А потім чекати деталі в приват. В програмі: кава, патчі та офігітєльні історії😏 Кількість місць обмежена обраним закладом. Попередня реєстрація обов'язкова.

🔥60👍195🤔1

31 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈5,640 views274 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Загальні витрати противника 1488200 Гарна цифра як не крути

🤝125🫡78🔥26👍22😁13👻3🍌2🙈2

30 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈3,430 views94 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/wUdt4rTq-HU?si=tKhuy6SadYqtMjS9 Чупік випустив нове відео.

🫡57👍352

29 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈3,370 views117 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @sokil_infoPhoto

ДРУГ «ПШЕК» ПОТРЕБУЄ НАШОЇ ПІДТРИМКИ. Наш побратим, військовий Друг «Пшек», зараз бореться з важкою хворобою - у нього діагностували хворобу мотонейрона. Попереду складний шлях лікування та реабілітації. Щоб його пройти, Пшеку потрібні сили, час і наша допомога. Просимо підтримати збір на лікування. 🔗 Посилання на збір: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/8bULFxDHS6 💳 Номер карти: 4874100032487772

🫡68🙏34💔8👍42🍌1

29 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈3,520 views121 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/eKKoceggloU?si=jqrwR90S-X3fsccp

55🫡53👍10🎉2🤷1

29 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈3,060 views382 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @tacticool_burgerPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁33619🔥12💯8👏4❤‍🔥2🤷1

29 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈3,120 views97 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

6418👍14🥰1

29 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈4,430 views359 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Два роки тому ці добродії підписали контракти з ЗСУ. Сьогодні під вечір на ютубі очікується невелике відео на цю тему.

👍187🫡131🔥2310😱3🦄2💊1🤷1

29 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈3,090 views272 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @sokil_infoVideo

🕯️ 29 серпня Україна вшановує пам’ять захисників і захисниць, які загинули в боротьбі за незалежність, суверенітет і територіальну цілісність держави. Ця дата нерозривно пов’язана з Іловайською трагедією 2014 року, коли під час виходу українських військових через так званий «зелений коридор» російські війська відкрили вогонь по колонах. Та сьогодні ми згадуємо не лише полеглих під Іловайськом. Ми схиляємо голови пе

🫡211💔49🙏84

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @hlopci_z_lisu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTCAnonymous Poll781 voters

Якщо у Києві відбудеться зустріч авторів з підписниками, ви:

  1. Прийду26%
  2. Не прийду64%
  3. Я руский пидар и наведу "Искандер" по месту встречи11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Американський 🚀 піхотинець
@usinfantryman1 · 91,878
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
😇Андрій ✙ ГАВ😈
@gavlife · 28,994
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
Той самий Кухарчук
@SlipioCkUa · 24,666
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
Розвідка Ноєм
@rozvidka_noem · 112,353
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Хроники Ридика 🫡
@hroniki_radika · 24,343
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Соціально-Побутовий Журнал «Водограй»
@mag_vodogray · 25,736
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 September 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології
@serhii_flash · 167,479
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хлопці з Лісу ✙” (@hlopci_z_lisu), 11,988 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hlopci_z_lisu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.