Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 27% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,003–53,266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:02
52,149
-60
16 Sept 2026, 06:17
52,209
-40
14 Sept 2026, 15:56
52,249
-41
13 Sept 2026, 03:40
52,290
-53
11 Sept 2026, 05:56
52,343
-65
8 Sept 2026, 09:17
52,408
-69
5 Sept 2026, 03:16
52,477
-46
3 Sept 2026, 06:24
52,523
-13
2 Sept 2026, 01:45
52,536
-27
31 Aug 2026, 23:38
52,563
-32
30 Aug 2026, 22:59
52,595
-25
29 Aug 2026, 23:54
52,620
-39
29 Aug 2026, 02:36
52,659
-53
27 Aug 2026, 23:52
52,712
-18
27 Aug 2026, 01:59
52,730
-46
26 Aug 2026, 02:46
52,776
-96
25 Aug 2026, 02:24
52,872
-38
23 Aug 2026, 20:17
52,910
-34
22 Aug 2026, 05:43
52,944
-17
20 Aug 2026, 18:14
52,961
first reading
Engagement
158 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.6%
avg views ÷ 52,149 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,200
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 158 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
158 (29 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
1,789,130
Reactions total
156,923
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,110
Videos
≈3,020
Links
≈4,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21m 57s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
337,343 reactions across 153 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
90,603
26.9%
❤
72,308
21.4%
😁
32,018
9.49%
🔥
26,130
7.75%
🤬
20,681
6.13%
🤣
18,251
5.41%
👍
16,590
4.92%
🫡
10,443
3.10%
💔
10,046
2.98%
😢
8,187
2.43%
😡
6,398
1.90%
🙏
5,120
1.52%
🤷♂
4,018
1.19%
🤔
3,000
0.889%
🤯
2,617
0.776%
😎
2,350
0.697%
👀
2,281
0.676%
🤝
1,325
0.393%
👏
1,157
0.343%
🤩
921
0.273%
22 further kinds
2,899
0.859%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 158 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349,916 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
102
across the posts below
Posts paid on
59
of 158 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KappaHimera. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 158 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вибачень від нас чомусь завжди вимагають ті, хто сам мав би нам дякувати.
Польща чудово розуміє, що якби не українці, русня вже давно могла б прийти до них. Але від нас продовжують вимагати вибачень за історію 100500-річної давнини. Чудово розуміючи, що це все хуйня, але придуркуватому електорату подобається, тому можна давити, поки ми воюємо.
Тепер Південна Корея. З 2024 року українці воюють з їхнім ворогом і беру…
Клуб з перших днів існування підрозділу підтримував нас. Багато наших хлопців є фанатами «Чорноморця», і особливо приємно, що тепер маємо офіційну співпрацю з рідним клубом.
Дякуємо керівництву за співпрацю та допомогу. Впевнений, що разом будемо ставати сильнішими й робити все можливе для захисту України та нашої спільної перемоги.
Японія виділила Україні ще $51,5 млн. Ці кошти підуть на розвиток медичної системи.
Це приклад, коли країна хоч і знаходиться дуже далеко, але чітко усвідомлює спільні інтереси і розуміє, з якого боку ворог 🇯🇵🤝🇺🇦
«ООН перетворилася на марну організацію, яка служить лише для того, щоб годувати касту смертельно зарозумілих паразитів, замаскованих під доброзичливих бюрократів».
База від президента 🇦🇷 Хав’єра Мілея під час виступу на Генасамблеї ООН.
Президент 🇰🇷 звинуватив Україну в тому, що «ми публічно визнали, що передали північнокорейських військовополонених» Сеулу 🤡
А якого хуя ми взагалі мусимо про це мовчати? Це що, теперішня влада так боїться Пхеньяна? Чи не грає, навпаки, на руку Південній Кореї те, що солдати північнокорейського пузиря відмовилися повертатися на «батьківщину», а поїхали на капіталістичний Південь?
Ось цими питаннями зараз корейська о…
Я думаю, росіяни зрозуміли, що НАТО це сильний та обʼєднаний альянс, який неможливо перемогти — генсек Альянсу, Рютте
Це тому по всій Європі літають русняві дрони та відбуваються диверсії?
Ай ладно, вже навіть якось заїбало коментувати це посміховисько.
Вночі в Молдові люб’язно приземлилися чотири руснявих шахеди. У Румунії впав ще один, через що зупинили навчання в декількох населених пунктах.
І все це під час Генасамблеї ООН, де всі говорять про мир у всьому світі й слухають казки кремлівської лошаді.
"Наш понос, наше достоjaнство и нашу слободу не дамо никоме да сруши" — заявив президент Сербії, Вучич, у себе в інстаграм.
Що б це не означало, звучить дуже потужно 😏
🤣1,330😁193🤩38👀35🤷♂26❤13🥴13🤪7
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @KappaHimera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Балакаємо українською MovaSpark @speakinua · 30,542 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
Я - ШТУРМОВИК ✙ @datsik5 · 25,666 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
🇺🇦💥Бахмутський Балу 💥🇺🇦 @bakhmutskyy · 40,608 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Muchnoy ✙ Jugend @muchnoyjugend88 · 40,490 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Розвідник ✙ @rozvidnuk_1 · 51,528 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
KRAKEN | ПБС 3 Армійського Корпусу @kraken_ab3 · 71,543 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Брати Яковлеви 🇺🇦 ꑭ @braty_yakovlevu · 26,355 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 September 2026
Думки Фронтовика ∆ @dumky_frontovyka · 55,044 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Володимир Великий @zelenskiy_vol · 23,924 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
Офіцер @officer_33 · 182,869 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
MaksymZhorin @MaksymZhorin · 4,349 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Хроники Ридика 🫡 @hroniki_radika · 24,084 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
KARYMAT @karymat · 73,265 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
PEKHNO🇺🇦 @pekhno_news · 68,199 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Позивний Каппа” (@KappaHimera), 52,149 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KappaHimera.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.