Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 365.nefed

Channel

365.nefed

@nefedoov365

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,825subscribers

+2,201 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001534811039
TypeChannel
Usernames@nefedoov365 @nefedovv365
Description❗️ Вся информация не является официальной, это только мнение автора. 🤝 По сотрудничеству и рекламе: @Nefedovv_bot
Created27 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held54
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nefedoov365

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

319,1399,5717 August 2026 — 16,624 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,618 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,605 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,597 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,586 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,570 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,566 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,551 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,540 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,522 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,510 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,496 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,487 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,465 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,451 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,432 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,420 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,409 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,400 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,390 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,373 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,360 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,344 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,344 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,344 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,333 subscribers18 September 2026 — 18,337 subscribers1 October 2026 — 18,714 subscribers6 October 2026 — 18,675 subscribers7 October 2026 — 3 subscribers10 October 2026 — 18,695 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,669 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,663 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,693 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,940 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,992 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,110 subscribers20 October 2026 — 19,139 subscribers21 October 2026 — 19,108 subscribers22 October 2026 — 19,070 subscribers23 October 2026 — 19,056 subscribers24 October 2026 — 19,043 subscribers25 October 2026 — 19,023 subscribers26 October 2026 — 19,014 subscribers27 October 2026 — 19,005 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,993 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,980 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,957 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,941 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,926 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,900 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,869 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,844 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,825 subscribers18,8257 August 20265 November 2026
54 measurements spanning 90 days, net +2,201. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 09:4418,825-19
4 Nov 2026, 08:2918,844-25
3 Nov 2026, 06:0918,869-31
2 Nov 2026, 03:0718,900-26
1 Nov 2026, 01:0718,926-15
31 Oct 2026, 02:4118,941-16
30 Oct 2026, 04:5818,957-23
29 Oct 2026, 04:4918,980-13
28 Oct 2026, 03:4818,993-12
27 Oct 2026, 05:3019,005-9
26 Oct 2026, 06:0119,014-9
25 Oct 2026, 08:5419,023-20
24 Oct 2026, 10:5419,043-13
23 Oct 2026, 14:1619,056-14
22 Oct 2026, 17:4919,070-38
21 Oct 2026, 15:0619,108-31
20 Oct 2026, 09:5919,139+29
19 Oct 2026, 08:4419,110+118
18 Oct 2026, 08:1618,992+52
17 Oct 2026, 09:0818,940first reading

Engagement

112 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.6%
avg views ÷ 18,825 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,710
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 112 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held112 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total201,200
Reactions total11,267
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,090
Videos
≈3,180
Links
≈1,790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
44m 04s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 62 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

37,771 reactions across 112 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12,16932.2%
🔥7,26019.2%
🤬4,69212.4%
👍4,31911.4%
🫡2,4456.47%
🙏2,0815.51%
😢1,8965.02%
😁8322.20%
🤣6661.76%
💯3060.81%
💘2450.649%
🤯1770.469%
👀1660.439%
❤‍🔥1380.365%
⚡1350.357%
👎900.238%
👏840.222%
😍290.077%
🏆170.045%
🕊140.037%
1 further kind100.026%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,771 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 112 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nefedoov365. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 112 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 22:46 UTC≈1,390 views209 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @newssdkVideo

Житель приграничного российского села указал оператору FPV ВСУ направление на «буханку» набитую российскими солдатами, после чего дрон поразил машину Подписаться | Чат | Связь

🔥164👍35🙏3👀2🤬2🤯2👎1

5 Nov 2026, 19:12 UTC≈3,450 views304 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Под Лиманом 28 наземных роботов 3-й штурмовой бригады пытались штурмом взять позицию, атаку отбили.

🔥155🫡67😢57🙏15👀6❤3🤬1

5 Nov 2026, 12:06 UTC≈4,370 views275 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В Дружковке бойцы 93-й ОМБр эвакуировали раненую пожилую женщину с помощью НРК Операция длилась двое суток. Женщина находилась в опасном районе под постоянной угрозой атак российских FPV-дронов.

❤192🙏61🫡19😢2🤣1

5 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC≈4,410 views249 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Полиция и СБУ установили 130 человек, причастных к беспорядкам в Петропавловской Борщаговке По данным следствия, 27 из них активно участвовали в противоправных действиях, еще 24 — провоцировали столкновения. В ходе беспорядков было повреждено четыре автомобиля полиции и автобус Национальной гвардии.

👍198👎18❤16🤣7😢6😁4

5 Nov 2026, 01:16 UTC≈6,090 views395 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Поражен нефтеперерабатывающий завод в Рязани.

👍247🔥120🫡15❤6⚡3👏2🤣2

4 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC≈5,650 views370 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Противник продолжает продвигаться в Белицком, ВСУ, в свою же очередь, наносят активные удары авиацией по позициям противника Добропольское направление

🙏281🤬64🫡16💯3❤‍🔥2👍2❤1🤣1

3 Nov 2026, 23:56 UTC≈9,250 views480 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Аэродром Гвардейское, Крым.

❤257🔥181👍33😍3👎2🤬2⚡1😢1

3 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC≈6,250 views438 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

На кадрах момент авиаудара российских нацистов ФАБом-3000 по Комышувахе в Запорожской области Людям раздавали гуманитарную помощь в школе. 31 человек погиб и еще 50 пропавших без вести.

🤬359😢63🤯7👍5❤2🤣2

3 Nov 2026, 15:09 UTC≈6,120 views294 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

FPV попадает в российского солдата, который залазил на дерево.

😁180👍74🔥32❤6🫡2

3 Nov 2026, 12:14 UTC≈7,580 views501 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ВСУ освободили Боровскую Андреевку, а также часть Зеленого Гая Боровское направление

❤383🫡52👍36🙏23🤣6👏1

3 Nov 2026, 11:17 UTC≈5,600 views286 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @Kyrylo_Budanov_OfficialVideo

Уже достеменно відомо, що вчорашні події на Петропавлівській Борщагівці відбулися не без впливу. Конкретні особи та ініціатори цих подій обов’язково будуть встановлені й покарані, так само як будуть зроблені висновки всередині силових структур. Генеральна прокуратура та відповідні органи вже розпочали об’єктивне розслідування. Ніхто не має права чинити свавілля. Кожен з нас має пам’ятати: головна опора існування Укр…

❤184👍46🤣31👎10🫡5😁5👀4💘1

2 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC≈6,470 views474 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Официальное заявление командующего бригадного генерала Дениса «Редиса» Прокопенко относительно событий в Петропавловской Борщаговке Он заявил, что подобная картина максимально отвечает интересам россиян. При этом создают её люди, которые никак не помогают в защите Украины.

❤252💯128🤣53👎16🤬14🫡5❤‍🔥4😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @nefedoov365. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Політстор
@politsto · 20,247
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 September 2026
Ukrainian Witness | War in Ukraine
@warinukraineua · 20,670
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 September 2026
Соняшник🦅
@soniah_hub · 42,074
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
Muchnoy ✙ Jugend
@muchnoyjugend88 · 40,250
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
СКАДОВСЬКИЙ ЗАХИСНИК
@defender_skdvsk · 43,722
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
✙ Хамелеон
@xameleon_ua · 24,266
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
Denys Davydov
@pilotblog · 190,587
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Женьок Вещає…
@ZhenyokSay · 157,607
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“365.nefed” (@nefedoov365), 18,825 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nefedoov365.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.