Прям фаєр шоу якесь
😁699🔥475🎉191🤣31❤11😱11👍10🤬10

Channel
@serhii_flash
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
166,174subscribers
+93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001836374264 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @serhii_flash |
| Description | Присылайте интересный контент сюда @serhii_flash_contact_bot Помощь на исследования и разработки по теме РЭР, РЭБ, связи для армии Украины Банка https://send.monobank.ua/jar/8iMJTXaHi5 Картка 4441 1144 4885 6722 PayPal sergey@aboutadriatic.com |
| Created | 2 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/serhii_flash |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 166,174 | +28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 166,146 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 166,150 | +27 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 166,123 | +25 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 166,098 | +31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 166,067 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:10 | 166,066 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 166,081 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 166,081 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,973,200 |
| Reactions total | 117,549 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
112,070 reactions across 25 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 21,436 | 19.1% | |
| 👍 | 14,618 | 13.0% | |
| 😁 | 12,717 | 11.3% | |
| ❤ | 9,006 | 8.04% | |
| ✍ | 8,179 | 7.30% | |
| 🤬 | 7,661 | 6.84% | |
| 💅 | 7,433 | 6.63% | |
| 🔥 | 6,649 | 5.93% | |
| 💯 | 6,253 | 5.58% | |
| 🍾 | 4,116 | 3.67% | |
| 👏 | 3,602 | 3.21% | |
| 💊 | 2,432 | 2.17% | |
| 🤔 | 1,587 | 1.42% | |
| 👀 | 1,078 | 0.962% | |
| 🤯 | 1,040 | 0.928% | |
| 🫡 | 999 | 0.891% | |
| 🙏 | 733 | 0.654% | |
| 😢 | 581 | 0.518% | |
| 😭 | 329 | 0.294% | |
| 🦄 | 244 | 0.218% | |
| 28 further kinds | 1,377 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117,549reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Прям фаєр шоу якесь
😁699🔥475🎉191🤣31❤11😱11👍10🤬10
Хлопці продовжують показувати як працює РЕБ на Шахедах. Ворог ніколи не зрозуміє моїх цілей. Можливо, я показую іншим, чого чекати від ворога. А можливо, я провокую ворога розгортати цю систему РЕБ ще ширше, бо нам дуже зручно виявляти «Шахеди» за їхніми радіосигналами. Нехай гадають)
💅2,200❤815🤣432👍392😁69💊53🤷♂44🦄19
Я поки що не знаю, чи це правдива новина, чи ні. Але це нагадує ідею прибрати курси валют з обмінників. У мене двояка думка. З одного боку, простим людям ця інформація не потрібна. Також ця інформація допомагає ворогу зрозуміти, як у нас справи з ракетами. Ця інфа допомогае ботам ворога формувати зраду. З іншого боку, ворог і так знає, що і куди долетіло та влучило. А ось публічна комунікація показує всьому світу н…
🤣2,850👍819🤔664👎81❤67💊63👻15🤝8
Пропозиція збивати нашими супутниками супутники Рассвет в космосі нагадала мені анекдот часів СРСР. Сообщение ТАСС: Сегодня в 12 часов по московскому времени, советский луноход успешно отобрал пробы лунного грунта…. у американского лунохода.
😁1,970💯294❤60🤨30👍25🦄11🍌9👎8
Чому мережа супутників «Рассвет» (аналог «Старлінк») у противника стане для нас проблемою. Зв'язок на фронтах у ворога покращиться — тут все зрозуміло. Основна загроза полягає в тому, що ми зараз не можемо використовувати «Старлінк» для онлайн керування БПЛА над Росією. Він там не працює. А ось росіяни зможуть атакувати всю нашу країну за допомогою БПЛА з онлайн-керуванням через свої супутники. Рішення я бачу ли…
🤣3,220💯2,190❤221🙏199👍131✍71🤬49🔥10
Отримую багато повідомлень про використання РЕБ на «Шахедах». У трофеях поки що таких пристроїв не знаходив. Ця технологія вже давно застосовується ворогом. Як це відбувається, видно на відео. РЕБ на «Шахеді» намагається заважати передачі відеосигналу від перехоплювача до пульта прийому відео на землі. Тобто рівень сігналу від передавача РЕБ Шахеда вище ніж від передавача на перехоплювачі, тому приймач на землі не б…
❤685✍547💯333🙏79👍58🤬38🍌21🌭8
Хлопці збили дуже незвичайний «Шахед» з позначкою «спеціальний». На жаль, таємниця «чорної скриньки» на «Шахеді» не розкрита. Дуже прошу надсилати мені все незвичайне, що Ви бачите. 1. ТГ бот https://t.me/serhii_flash_contact_bot 2. Форма https://forflash.com.ua
✍538❤213👍120👀79🤔35🤣27💊15🍌9
Росія блокує сигнал GPS у Балтійському морі, побоюючись наших БПЛА. У результаті кораблі без GPS не можуть орієнтуватися у морі. Цивільні моряки рф придумали, як боротися з РЕБ, але авторських прав на відро вони не отримають, тому що ми все це пройшли, починаючи з 2022 року. Відра, каструлі, сітки, ями, фольга, заклинання та інше.
😁1,600🫡244🤣219❤75👍63✍58🦄30👏20
З першого дня війни я був поруч із зв’язківцями найрізноманітніших підрозділів і вважаю їх своєю другою родиною. Ми є скрізь. Без нас управління армією неможливе. Де б я не опинився на фронті, я прошу: відведіть мене до зв’язківців. І ось я «вдома», я в «родині». Сучасний зв’язок — це зовсім не те, що багато хто собі уявляє. Це вже здебільшого робота з програмами, комп’ютерами, серверами. Також зв’язківці це не лиш…
🤣2,910❤1,770🫡727👍276👏26🍌24🦄24🏆20
Хлопці с підрозділу Залізні Птахи - перехоплювачі 3ОВМБр збили Молнію з невідомим БЧ. Можливо хтось знає що це?
🤔701✍539🤬43❤34🤣22👏21👍15😎14
Друзі, багато питань щодо РЕБ проти повітряних загроз. 1. РЕБ не змушує «Шахед» впасти. РЕБ не дає «Шахеду» знайти й атакувати ціль, та надає додаткову можливість збити «Шахед» силам ППО. 2. РЕБ не відхиляє балістику. Навіть якби РЕБ міг це робити, ми б не використовували цю можливість у містах. Краще, щоб ракета прилетіла вночі на територію порожнього заводу, ніж в сусідній житловий комплекс під впливом РЕБ. 3. Т…
🤣2,180✍796👍309❤174🤔56💊20😁17🙉15
Друг подарував мені трофейну книгу. За кілька років, звісно, все застаріло, але книга унікальна тим, що ворог зібрав в одному документі весь «зоопарк» безпілотників, які літали у нас у 2023 році. З фотографіями та описами на 800 сторінок. Навіть ми самі такого не змогли зробити))
✍1,250👍873😁484🤔114❤72🤣59👏26🔥26
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @serhii_flash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 14,553 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Serhii Beskrestnov |
|---|---|
| Description | military analyst, engineer and specialist in radio technologies; drone specialist; former adviser to the head of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Fedorov, adviser to the President of Ukraine on the development of defense technologies |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сергій FLASH | Про технології” (@serhii_flash), 166,174 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serhii_flash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.