Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Khimikdavid

@khimikdavid4308

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

77,297subscribers

-93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001698751998
TypeChannel
Username@khimikdavid4308
Created28 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khimikdavid4308

Growth

77,29777,39077,343.56 August 2026 — 77,390 subscribers7 August 2026 — 77,382 subscribers8 August 2026 — 77,384 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,362 subscribers10 August 2026 — 77,384 subscribers11 August 2026 — 77,373 subscribers12 August 2026 — 77,341 subscribers13 August 2026 — 77,313 subscribers14 August 2026 — 77,297 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,283–77,404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:4577,297-16
13 Aug 2026, 05:0777,313-28
12 Aug 2026, 02:1277,341-32
11 Aug 2026, 00:0877,373-11
10 Aug 2026, 00:5177,384+22
9 Aug 2026, 01:1277,362-22
8 Aug 2026, 00:4777,384+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:0077,382-8
6 Aug 2026, 08:1777,390first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
52
Videos
34
Links
25

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

38,502 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13,47735.0%
😁9,54324.8%
🤣5,89315.3%
custom 52832767529892026882,3386.07%
🫡1,8464.79%
👎1,8094.70%
❤‍🔥1,4773.84%
👍1,0582.75%
🔥3981.03%
🤬3861.00%
👾1000.26%
😭640.166%
😎550.143%
😈520.135%
💔60.016%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,502reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2025 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
722
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 20 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
240
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @khimikdavid4308. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2025 to 13 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Mar 2026, 20:48 UTC≈73,800 views1,119 reactions5 Starsread 15 August 2026

Про маму нормально жартує,старий шарить)

😁849🤣126custom 52832767529892026889521👎10🔥7👾6🤬5

13 Mar 2026, 20:47 UTC≈69,000 views1,239 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Мені такий пропуск він би зробив?

🤣1,010custom 5283276752989202688119😁7117🫡6😎6👎5👾4

13 Mar 2026, 20:44 UTC≈65,900 views1,046 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @borys_filatovv

Смотри, дешевая зумерская бубочка, лачен-обосрыш, который наложил уже кирпичами по всему интернету. Ты не плачь, малыш. Я еще только начал тобой заниматься. Если ты такой духовитый, то подымай свой зад и я жду тебя в 13-00 в понедельник, 16 марта у себя в кабинете. Днепр, Яворницкого, 75. И мы с тобой в прямом эфире поговорим: о мародерах, рейдерстве, твоей мамаше, которая ограбила ЮМЗ в пользу русских, твоем бро

😁737custom 528327675298920268810882😭41🤣30👍17🔥14🤬9

5 Mar 2026, 23:35 UTC≈71,500 views553 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

364❤‍🔥86🤣30custom 528327675298920268830👎28😈8🫡7

5 Mar 2026, 23:30 UTC≈68,100 views1,024 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

😂

🤣90540custom 528327675298920268824🤬16😈15👎10🔥9😁5

5 Mar 2026, 18:26 UTC≈59,300 views2,149 reactions240 Starsread 15 August 2026

Що ви,мої маленькі, сумували?

1,130custom 5283276752989202688772🫡112👍44👎27❤‍🔥23😁14🤣11

20 Feb 2026, 16:59 UTC≈86,400 views1,819 reactions55 Starsread 15 August 2026

І до похвали і до осуду відношусь однаково, нейтрально. Можете захоплюватись , можете ненавидити. Одне я розумію точно, не заради вас я пройшов цей життєвий шлях.

❤‍🔥943custom 5283276752989202688520114👍72🤣64🫡54🔥27👎19

20 Feb 2026, 16:53 UTC≈87,300 views1,151 reactions42 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ТЦК та владу не підтримую, але факт залишається фактом, він пітух.

775👎146custom 528327675298920268893😁61👍44🫡19😈5👾4

20 Feb 2026, 14:13 UTC≈75,600 views2,331 reactions16 Starsread 15 August 2026

Так і що, ситуацію з футболістом-пітухом спустять на гальмах?

👎1,350508custom 5283276752989202688205🤬170🤣49😁22❤‍🔥12👍12

18 Feb 2026, 14:07 UTC≈74,700 views1,542 reactions12 Starsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🤣857custom 5283276752989202688365138😁57🫡48❤‍🔥33👾24😈7

15 Nov 2025, 10:38 UTC≈127,000 views4,213 reactions102 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Розбиті їбальники при поверненні в Україну збільшуються , тепер це легально)

😁3,220440🤣148🫡131👍130👎85🤬20🔥17

14 Oct 2025, 20:40 UTC≈147,000 views2,003 reactions7 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

А Філатов коли?

1,590👍243😁67🤣46👎20🔥16👾10❤‍🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khimikdavid4308. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,218,285 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лебидло
@lebigaa · 427,391
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
1-й корпус НГУ «Азов»
@azov_media · 241,163
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Спортивна назва
@sportvukr · 104,704
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Третій армійський корпус
@ab3army · 275,759
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Говорять Снайпер ꑭ
@stanislav_osman · 292,866
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Лачен пише
@lachentyt · 1,563,312
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
ДОХЛІ РАСІЯНЄ ✙
@dokhlyye_rossiyane · 105,177
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
NEWS.GRP🇺🇦
@newsgrpua · 119,829
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
Сили Спеціальних Операцій ЗС України
@ukr_sof · 135,343
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
Бавовна
@ukrbavovna · 644,927
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Євген Карась ✙
@karas_evgen · 165,940
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Бахмутський Демон 👹
@bahshiddemon · 171,886
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Русский Добровольческий Корпус
@rvc_army · 114,843
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Жорін /// Третій армійський корпус
@MaksymZhorin · 108,268
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Бро скинув мем
@bromeeems · 318,578
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Валерій Залужний
@Zaluzhnui · 225,347
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Розвідка Ноєм
@rozvidka_noem · 113,522
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Khimikdavid” (@khimikdavid4308), 77,297 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khimikdavid4308.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.