National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
133,000 average views per post against 171,886 subscribers — an engagement rate of 77.2%. Across the 7,078 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,015–316,163 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.88% and 13.3%, with a median of 5.50%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured
62 of 62 published in the window (0 exact, 62 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
8,227,600
Mature posts only
78.3% over 60 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 52 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 171,186–172,095 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 18:40
171,886
-95
19 Sept 2026, 17:18
171,981
-9
17 Sept 2026, 06:40
171,990
+69
15 Sept 2026, 09:16
171,921
+62
13 Sept 2026, 14:59
171,859
+525
11 Sept 2026, 20:35
171,334
+43
9 Sept 2026, 10:18
171,291
-178
6 Sept 2026, 03:40
171,469
+34
3 Sept 2026, 21:00
171,435
-57
2 Sept 2026, 11:58
171,492
-34
1 Sept 2026, 09:16
171,526
-34
31 Aug 2026, 08:47
171,560
+1
30 Aug 2026, 08:17
171,559
-41
29 Aug 2026, 11:36
171,600
-10
28 Aug 2026, 10:24
171,610
+17
27 Aug 2026, 10:23
171,593
+49
26 Aug 2026, 06:55
171,544
-32
25 Aug 2026, 07:12
171,576
-99
24 Aug 2026, 05:09
171,675
-61
22 Aug 2026, 13:12
171,736
first reading
Engagement
162 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
77.2%
avg views ÷ 171,886 subscribers
Avg views / post
133,000
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 162 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
162 (1 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
8,227,600
Reactions total
332,460
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 20:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
276
Videos
199
Links
206
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
12m 07s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
848,357 reactions across 158 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
258,682
30.5%
🙏
203,975
24.0%
💯
150,694
17.8%
😢
60,624
7.15%
🔥
55,042
6.49%
👍
40,323
4.75%
🫡
19,267
2.27%
💔
11,803
1.39%
🥰
7,397
0.872%
🤯
6,343
0.748%
🤔
5,264
0.62%
👀
5,020
0.592%
🙈
4,908
0.579%
🍌
4,118
0.485%
🤨
4,034
0.476%
🌚
1,900
0.224%
🎉
1,661
0.196%
😭
1,233
0.145%
❤🔥
1,084
0.128%
🍾
659
0.078%
26 further kinds
4,326
0.51%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 162 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 868,606 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,683
across the posts below
Posts paid on
155
of 162 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
255
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bahshiddemon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 162 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сучасна війна дійшла до того, що байдуже, куди йде піхота і чи може вона контролювати міста, якщо дронами можна зробити життя цивільних нестерпним. На жаль, цивільні під терором не сильно зважають на дії піхоти, яка не пускає ворога в їх дім. Цивільні страждають від дронів.
Це дуже складна парадигма, дуже непростий час.
Бачу багато хто дивується, чому військові в соцмережах пишуть «де зарплата?». Комусь прийшла, комусь ні. Між собою обговорюють, невдоволення є в тих, кому в пʼятницю не капнула, а капне у вівторок.
А не було б цього, якби ця зарплата не була копійками. Чимало пациків живуть по принципу закрити кредитку і знов відкрити. Реальність, як вона є. Комусь вистачає, комусь не вистачає взагалі. Великий організм ця армія.
Атеїсти моляться. Часто моляться, коли близько ФПВ і нема сіткомета. Я бачив багато атеїстів, які молилися пошепки. За ці роки я сам молився і не раз. Коли їхав у далекий тил, я ходив у храми, в католицькі і православні, для мене нема різниці, який в них бог. Був день, коли я плакав у церкві, стояв на колінах і плакав сам. Це був 2024 рік. Було важко, а потім стало так добре.
Був знайомий на позивний Чук. Бородатий …
Наші далекобійні удари продовжують радувати. Видно, що російська ППО не здатна перехоплювати всі наші дрони, а заходи безпеки на НПЗ та інших обʼєктах досі недостатні для того, аби дрон не міг заподіяти шкоди. Втім, постійно розраховувати лише на БПЛА в цій війні - не дуже перспективно. Розширення ракетної програми потрібне. Питання «де балістика?» все частіше звучить не тільки в соцмережах, і на цьому фоні постійні …
Як вам Range за 100 грн?
Так, всього за 100 грн розігруємо неймовірний Range Rover Supercharged 5.0 від ветерана ССО. Збираємо 10 млн на дрони для Сил спецоперацій.
Ця тачка була мрією мого близького друга і побратима. Людина пройшла найгарячіші точки повномасштабки, зараз на цивільному житті у зв’язку з пораненням. Зараз віддає, аби своїм побратимам допомогти.
Його родина віддає не перше авто на розіграш. І чесно…
По перехоплювачам - є питання висотності російських реактивів, а також темпів масштабування розробок. Збиття реактивів перехоплювачами новими вже є, але роботи вистачає.
За тривалий час у війську я побачив те, що бачив і в цивільному житті. Багато нікчемних сраколизів, які боряться за дупку свого падавана, нашіптуючи на вухо, які погані всі навколо, а особливо ті, хто є професіоналами і на думку сраколизів можуть становити загрозу їх перебуванню біля солодкої дупки, від якої залежить їх існування. Так от, ті падавани, які в підсумку обирали сраколизів, а не профі, які не завжди є зру…
Маємо ще невеличкий рух вперед на одному з напрямків.
Також ведеться робота по зриву планів росіян на Запорізькому напрямку, який дуже важкий.
🙏6,290❤796🫡216👍210🔥67🍌43😢9🤝5
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @bahshiddemon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🇺🇦💥Бахмутський Балу 💥🇺🇦 @bakhmutskyy · 40,608 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Muchnoy ✙ Jugend @muchnoyjugend88 · 40,490 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
СКАДОВСЬКИЙ ЗАХИСНИК @defender_skdvsk · 42,140 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
МАДЯР🇺🇦 @robert_magyar · 603,010 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Я - ШТУРМОВИК ✙ @datsik5 · 25,666 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Розвідник ✙ @rozvidnuk_1 · 51,528 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
КOVALENKO @akovalenko1989 · 60,758 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Говорять Снайпер ꑭ @stanislav_osman · 289,232 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
MYROSHNYKOV @myro_shnykov · 31,081 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
Дивізіон-«ТІВАЗ» @tivaz_artillery · 41,361 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Думки Фронтовика ∆ @dumky_frontovyka · 55,044 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Офіцер @officer_33 · 182,869 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Той самий Кухарчук @SlipioCkUa · 24,831 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
Позивний Каппа @KappaHimera · 52,149 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
🐻Балу HUB🐻 @BaluHUB777 · 55,014 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
Хроники Ридика 🫡 @hroniki_radika · 24,084 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Піхотинець Хижак🦅🇺🇦 @lost_generation_88 · 64,227 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
MaksymZhorin @MaksymZhorin · 4,349 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Aeris Rimor @AerisRimor · 163,758 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Тарас Григорович повідомляє @tgp_news · 58,091 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
🇺🇦 МИСЯГІН 🇺🇦 @mysiagin · 21,716 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
△ 225 ОШП △ @OSHP_225 · 23,888 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Легіон Диванної Розвідки 🇺🇦🔱 @couch_iu · 31,279 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
СИРСЬКИЙ @osirskiy · 48,471 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 582 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Шевцова Олена Іванівна(uk.wikipedia.org) “…мобілізація і тест на зрілість]
* Пост про ініціативи з реформування у ЗСУ О.Шевцової у Телеграм-каналі [https://t.me/bahshiddemon/3599 "Бахмутський демон"]…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бахмутський Демон 👹” (@bahshiddemon), 171,886 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bahshiddemon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.