Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КOVALENKO

@akovalenko1989

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

61,605subscribers

-186 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001618958919
TypeChannel
Username@akovalenko1989
Created27 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/akovalenko1989

Growth

61,60561,79161,6986 August 2026 — 61,791 subscribers6 August 2026 — 61,791 subscribers6 August 2026 — 61,762 subscribers7 August 2026 — 61,728 subscribers8 August 2026 — 61,690 subscribers9 August 2026 — 61,658 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61,666 subscribers11 August 2026 — 61,647 subscribers12 August 2026 — 61,605 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,577–61,819 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:3361,605-42
11 Aug 2026, 21:0361,647-19
10 Aug 2026, 17:3561,666+8
9 Aug 2026, 18:4161,658-32
8 Aug 2026, 20:0961,690-38
7 Aug 2026, 20:5261,728-34
6 Aug 2026, 22:0461,762-29
6 Aug 2026, 01:3661,791no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:2661,791first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.2%
avg views ÷ 61,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,200
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held38 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total1,221,730
Reactions total32,958
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 53s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

29,079 reactions across 34 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14,14748.7%
6,58622.6%
👍5,78219.9%
😱1,8396.32%
👏3961.36%
😁3291.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,958reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 38 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @akovalenko1989. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,330 views157 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ми вимкнемо російську військову машину — знищимо інфраструктуру, флот, логістику, об’єкти паливно-енергетичного комплексу та підприємства, які працюють на війну проти України, — в.о. міністра оборони Євгеній Хмара. Особисто підтримую пана Хмару 💪

🔥12622👏4😁4👍1

11 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC≈17,800 views587 reactionsread 12 August 2026

путін збирається продовжувати війну щонайменше до 2028 року. Президент сьогодні озвучив плани, які існують щодо мобілізації в рф - декілька сотень тисяч на цей рік, після так званих виборів. І так само в наступному, що свідчить про бажання воювати далі. Як і писав сьогодні - всі партії на виборах в рф сповідують продовження війни, а єдину антивоєнну «яблуко» з виборів зняли. Також важливо розуміти, що на росії є е

😱54219👍16😁8🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC≈20,100 views408 reactionsread 12 August 2026

росія збирається масово фальсифікувати так звані вибори до держдуми на ТОТ України. путінська адміністрація ставить задачу забезпечити явку на тимчасово окупованих територіях на рівні понад 65-70%, а також забезпечити «єдіной росії» не менше 70% підтримки. Самі ж вибори на ТОТ України є повністю незаконними, але росія хоче використати їх в якості легітимізації окупації. Також важливо, що вибори до держдуми в рф зар

👍32431😱29😁24

11 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC≈19,900 views1,030 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Воронезька область, логістичний хаб 🔥

🔥908👍7435👏10😱2😁1

10 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈21,100 views1,241 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

тюменщина горить.

🔥1,090👍8346👏15😁6😱1

10 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈30,400 views913 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ніякої жіночої мобілізації не планується, так само не планується ніяких змін щодо батьків трьох дітей. Досить розганяти дурню.

624👍240😁41😱8

10 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈24,400 views495 reactionsread 12 August 2026

росія готує дезінформаційну кампанію, яка стосуватиметься теми військовополонених. росіяни хочуть продемонструвати, що нібито ставляться до наших полонених краще, ніж Україна до російських. Під це виділені ресурси на медіа заходи, відбувається переміщення українських полонених в більш комфортні умови для зняття відповідних медійних сюжетів, які за завданням мають поширюватися на західну аудиторію. Також рф планує вик

😱401👍63😁1714

10 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈21,100 views436 reactionsread 12 August 2026

кндр зацікавлена у здобутті досвіду у війні рф проти України для того, щоб розпочати етап агресії на Корейському півострові. Не виключено, що пхеньян зараз вбачає вікно можливостей з огляду на протистояння США та ірану, вичерпування боєприпасів, на яких так само підтримується стабільність Індо-Тихоокеанського регіону. Японії та Південній Кореї доведеться взяти більше відповідальності за безпеку. Так чи інакше, в пхен

253👍142😱32😁9

10 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC≈21,100 views999 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

СОУ дотягнулися до НПЗ в Татарстані.

🔥88973👍27😁5👏4😱1

9 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC≈39,100 views1,280 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

В брянську та курську сьогодні максимально гучно. Там по місцевих чатах трохи паніка.

🔥1,100👍11457👏4😁4😱1

8 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈25,700 views993 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

ГУР МО активно знищує росіян на Запорізькому напрямку. Логістика і рух ворога під контролем воєнної розвідки.

🔥85182👍53😱4😁3

8 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈28,200 views917 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Логістика перебудується, в росіян не вийде створити продовольчу кризу, згадайте ситуацію паливом в 2022 році. Розумію, що спекуляції забезпечать трафік і перегляди, але не варто, тимчасова відсутність деяких товарів в окремих магазинах, саме окремих, не є ознакою постійного дефіциту. В окремих товару нема, в інших - є. Логістика і зберігання перебудуються і адаптуються під нові умови. Спокійніше трохи.

666👍227👏9😁9😱6

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @akovalenko1989. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 158,484 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бахмутський Демон 👹
@bahshiddemon · 171,857
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Говорять Снайпер ꑭ
@stanislav_osman · 293,350
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
∆✙🍒Гнила черешня🇺🇦✙∆
@gnilayachereha · 429,066
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
⚡️INFOFAKT УКРАЇНА
@infofakt_ukr · 187,804
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
⚔️БРАТЧУК
@Bratchuk_Sergey · 151,177
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Волхва України Ольга Берлінська
@VolxvaUkrain · 165,776
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
МАДЯР🇺🇦
@robert_magyar · 600,287
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS
@Tsaplienko · 323,077
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Кримськ (аеродром) (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…листопада 2024 аеродром атакували безпілотники{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/akovalenko1989/8283|title=KOVALENKO|website=Telegram|access-date=2024-11…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КOVALENKO” (@akovalenko1989), 61,605 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akovalenko1989.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.