Тут кують українське економічне диво.
З усіх питань — @OstCap_Admin
Всі посилання – https://linktr.ee/OstanniyCapitalist
Інвестиційний канал – @CapitalistInvest
Канал з головними публікаціями – @cent_to_cent
Created
16 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -671. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118,211–119,093 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 19:00
118,320
-32
17 Sept 2026, 06:54
118,352
+39
15 Sept 2026, 09:58
118,313
-37
13 Sept 2026, 19:15
118,350
-1
12 Sept 2026, 00:01
118,351
-64
9 Sept 2026, 15:16
118,415
-38
6 Sept 2026, 10:19
118,453
-16
4 Sept 2026, 02:38
118,469
-24
2 Sept 2026, 14:26
118,493
-24
1 Sept 2026, 16:55
118,517
-76
31 Aug 2026, 15:35
118,593
-72
30 Aug 2026, 13:44
118,665
+25
29 Aug 2026, 16:56
118,640
-26
28 Aug 2026, 13:27
118,666
+15
27 Aug 2026, 15:37
118,651
-58
26 Aug 2026, 18:48
118,709
+2
25 Aug 2026, 15:18
118,707
-32
24 Aug 2026, 13:25
118,739
-43
22 Aug 2026, 22:13
118,782
-91
21 Aug 2026, 11:32
118,873
first reading
Engagement
846 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 118,320 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,200
480 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
480
of 846 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
846 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
12,563,100
Reactions total
435,576
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈29,200
Videos
≈8,290
Links
≈21,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 34m
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 222 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
758,415 reactions across 829 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
129,257
17.0%
😁
118,767
15.7%
❤
107,382
14.2%
🤣
76,280
10.1%
👍
73,863
9.74%
🤬
65,583
8.65%
🔥
50,625
6.68%
💯
35,949
4.74%
🤮
17,828
2.35%
💊
17,179
2.27%
🤔
8,539
1.13%
😢
6,967
0.919%
🏆
6,800
0.897%
🤯
5,629
0.742%
🤨
5,422
0.715%
😴
3,571
0.471%
🥱
3,123
0.412%
🙏
2,382
0.314%
🤷♂
2,185
0.288%
👀
1,991
0.263%
45 further kinds
19,093
2.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 846 of the 846 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 773,579 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 846 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
51
of 846 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OstanniyCapitalist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 846 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.77%
15 of 846 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
24,000
over 15 measured posts
Median views · rest
25,600
over 831 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 846 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Крадії поцупили причепи з написом Nvidia, але знайшли там 18 тонн піску
Два причепи компанії PlusAI, оформлені з логотипами Nvidia, викрали зі складу в Ньюарку, штат Каліфорнія, після чого їх знайшли приблизно за 800 метрів від підприємства
За даними поліції, зловмисники зламали замки, під'єднали до причепів власні тягачі та вкрали їх, розраховуючи захопити партію високовартісних чипів чи відеокарт, але згодом поки…
ОВДП стали настільки популярними, що для багатьох українців це вже відповідь на будь-яке питання про інвестиції.
Куди покласти заощадження? ОВДП.
Куди перевести гроші з депозиту? ОВДП.
Куди вкласти вільні кошти? Знову ОВДП.
І це зрозуміло: висока дохідність, відносна простота та державні зобов'язання за виплатами.
Але чи не стає така популярність проблемою вже для самого інвестора?
Якщо значна частина ваших грошей…
Навіть союзник мультимільярдер Тіль називає цю команду Трампа - тупою.
То які нормальні мирні угоди з ними можливі? Хіба дати росії передишку. Що, впринципі, ми і бачимо. Що по тиску, якого менше. Що по нафті, як все дорожче.
Трамп: Знаєте, чого я хочу від Зеленського? Щоб він уклав угоду. Я хочу, щоб він домовився з путіним, і я хочу, щоб путін домовився з ним
Із Зеленським ми говорили про багато різних речей, і щодо багатьох із них у нас повна згода
Останній Капіталіст | Підтримати наc на MonoBase
Запускаємо Армію роботів.
У 2022 році ми запустили Армію дронів. Тоді мало хто уявляв, наскільки сильно безпілотники змінять війну.
Сьогодні дрони забезпечують понад 95% уражень, а в Україні працюють уже більш ніж 700 виробників БпЛА.
Але технологічна війна не стоїть на місці.
Нам потрібен наступний прорив.
Наша ставка — роботизація війни.
Мета Армії роботів — берегти життя людей.
Найнебезпечнішу роботу мають …
Ведучий: Хто, на вашу думку, був би кращим кандидатом, щоб підвищити шанси республіканців на перемогу?
Республіканці скоро ухвалять рішення. Найчастіше згадують Джей Ді Венса та Марко Рубіо
Засновник Palantir Тіль: Я все ще є прихильником Венса. Я хвилююся, що обом кандидатам буде важко перемогти. Тому, не знаю, моя песимістична думка, що це неправильне запитання
Ведучий: Тоді яке правильне?
Тіль: Хто буде кандид…
Ведучий: У 2016-му, коли я запитав вас, чому ви підтримуєте Трампа, ви тоді відповіли, що нинішня партія та її керівництво настільки недієздатні, що їм просто потрібні зміни
Це була цікава думка, яку я цілком міг зрозуміти. Чи скажете ви зараз, через 10 років, що нам знову потрібні зміни?
Засновник Palantir Тіль: Я не хочу змін на кшталт демократичних соціалістів. Це здається катастрофічним
Але знову ж таки, якщо …
Ведучий: У 2016 році ви підтримували Трампа
Десять років по тому, як би ви проаналізували його досягнення, як би ви проаналізували його невдачі?
Де ви знаходитесь сьогодні стосовно останніх двох років і першого терміну президента?
Засновник Palantir Тіль: Ви повинні запитати мене через десять років або близько того, і ми побачимо через десять років, як все складеться
Я досі вважаю, що в багатьох відношеннях це ві…
Трамп відкинув пропозицію Ірану про семиденне припинення вогню та сказав своїм радникам, що очікує відновлення бомбардувань Ірану після проміжних виборів у США
Іран пропонував відкрити Ормузьку протоку та відновити переговори щодо ядерної програми в обмін на зняття американської морської блокади, розмороження частини активів і послаблення санкцій на експорт нафти
Трамп приватно сумнівається, що Тегеран погодиться н…
Румунія платить за донорство крові підвищеними ставками за держоблігаціями, — Bloomberg
У Румунії донори крові можуть придбати державні облігації зі ставкою понад 7%, що приблизно на один відсотковий пункт вище за стандартну дохідність для роздрібних інвесторів
З початку 2025 року така програма залучила близько 2,8 млрд леїв, або $604 млн, від десятків тисяч приватних інвесторів і забезпечує майже п'яту частину пот…
OpenAI повідомила уряди про злами, які здійснили її ШІ-агенти, — FT
OpenAI повідомила "десятки" партнерів, зокрема уряди, університети та державні установи, що її ШІ-агенти могли обходити системи безпеки або порушувати роботу сторонніх сервісів
Компанія виявила ці випадки під час перевірки моделей після липневого інциденту, коли агенти OpenAI отримали доступ до інтернету та зламали репозиторій Hugging Face
OpenAI …
🤡294😁140🤬45❤19😨16🏆6🔥3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 846 posts we hold for @OstanniyCapitalist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@OstanniyCapitalist edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 69 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко @gudymenko_official · 38,810 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Forbes Ukraine @Forbes_Ukraine_official · 49,900 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Molfar про OSINT @molfar_global · 51,742 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Залізний нардеп @yzheleznyak · 97,710 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Armchair General UA ✙ @armchairgeneralUA · 41,826 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
DOU @doucommunity · 42,436 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
FEDOROV @zedigital · 216,374 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Стартапенко: IT, технології @startup_ukr · 85,827 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Djinni (/◔ ◡ ◔)/ @djinni_official · 50,062 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
КІБЕРБЕЗ @cybersecurity_ua · 53,265 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
ОГо! @OGoMono · 648,179 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Мілітарний @milinua · 72,836 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
HackYourMom - мамкіни хакери України 🇺🇦 @hackyourmom · 48,018 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Мінцифра @mintsyfra · 38,079 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Inzhur @InzhurREIT · 57,304 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Бабель @babel · 77,552 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
InformNapalm @informnapalm · 131,350 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Розвідка Ноєм @rozvidka_noem · 112,116 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Шпальта @shpalta · 47,173 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Данило Гетманцев @getmantsevdanil · 65,987 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
LIGA.net @liganet · 39,993 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Шрайк @RomanShrike · 42,255 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Андрій Садовий @andriysadovyi · 86,146 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
РЕЙД Info ✙ @ukropernews · 44,592 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 165 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Останній Капіталіст ✙” (@OstanniyCapitalist), 118,320 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OstanniyCapitalist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
