Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “ОГо! 🐈” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
385,000 average views per post against 651,038 subscribers — an engagement rate of 59.2%. Across the 1,191 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,564–998,717 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.49% and 10.9%, with a median of 3.81%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
10 of 10 published in the window (0 exact, 10 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,851,000
Mature posts only
59.2% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net -16,987. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 645,631–667,714 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 02:58
648,179
-2,859
17 Sept 2026, 17:40
651,038
-547
15 Sept 2026, 16:02
651,585
-421
14 Sept 2026, 02:59
652,006
-473
12 Sept 2026, 10:20
652,479
-718
10 Sept 2026, 07:56
653,197
-716
7 Sept 2026, 04:20
653,913
-614
4 Sept 2026, 09:20
654,527
-321
3 Sept 2026, 00:59
654,848
-310
2 Sept 2026, 00:23
655,158
-466
31 Aug 2026, 23:28
655,624
-420
30 Aug 2026, 21:34
656,044
-510
29 Aug 2026, 20:18
656,554
-385
28 Aug 2026, 19:24
656,939
-165
27 Aug 2026, 21:14
657,104
-309
26 Aug 2026, 20:46
657,413
-381
25 Aug 2026, 23:54
657,794
-449
25 Aug 2026, 00:58
658,243
-1,090
23 Aug 2026, 11:04
659,333
-1,123
21 Aug 2026, 19:55
660,456
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.4%
avg views ÷ 648,179 subscribers
Avg views / post
385,000
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
46 (15 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
3,851,000
Reactions total
69,340
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 37s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
448,991 reactions across 45 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
276,721
61.6%
😁
86,874
19.3%
🔥
53,923
12.0%
👍
30,416
6.77%
🤬
1,057
0.235%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 461,143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На monoмаркеті від завтра 20 платежів на зарядні станції брендів Marstek та Jackery!!!
Акція починається опівночі і діє всі вихідні, до 27 вересня. Тому, якщо придивлялися собі станцію, треба брати зараз. Та краще не зволікати, бо як показує досвід, щось може й закінчитися раніше
Про всяк випадок нагадую, що доставка безкоштовна
А ще діліться своїми покупками в Threads, а я подарую їх пʼятьом випадковим людям
Зробили на monoбазарі окрему добірку з товарами від ветеранів
Заходьте за посиланням та підтримайте ветеранів покупкою:
https://monobazar.com.ua/collections/veterany
Кіберполіція викрила скам-спільноти в 20 регіонах: повідомлено про 23 підозри в операції «WallHack».
Шахраї через месенджери поширювали фейкові сайти банків, торгових платформ і держсервісів, щоб красти платіжні дані та доступ до рахунків. Під час операції проведено 239 обшуків, заблоковано тисячі фішингових посилань і 300 Telegram-каналів.
8 фігурантів затримані, 4 під вартою, 5 справ уже в суді. Викриттю зловмисн…
IPHONE 18 PRO MAX ЗА ДОНАТ НА РУСОРІЗ!
Учора Apple презентувала нові айфони, а вже сьогодні ми розігруємо такого красунчика.
Умови, як завжди, прості: донат від 300 грн на банку http://send.monobank.ua/jar/2JbpBYkhMv.
Більше донатів, кратних 300, — більше шансів. Переможця оберемо у понеділок, 14 вересня. А приз він отримає щойно смартфони заїдуть в Україну.
❗️Якщо донатите не з картки mono, вказуйте номер телефо…
Якщо у вас є свій бізнес і ви досі не приймаєте оплати через plata by mono, у мене для вас ділова пропозиція
Підключаєте еквайринг у вересні – і протягом 30 днів комісія буде 0%.
Такий собі безкоштовний пробний період
Приємних фішок у нашого еквайрингу багато:
• підключення до 10 хвилин – ми засікали
• розробник не потрібен, є 50+ готових інтеграцій із ШІ, різними платформами, конструкторами сайтів, CRM-ками та ПРР…
Сьогодні будете обирати кешбеки в mono - зверніть увагу на категорію «Книги в Україні»
У вересні ми даємо 15% кешбеку на книжки
Якщо багато хто з вас обере цю категорію і купить протягом місяця хоча б пару книжок, це будуть десятки мільйонів гривень, які ми разом спрямуємо на підтримку українських видавництв
Мені взагалі подобається ця історія. Бо як не крути, є щось особливе в тому, щоб купувати книжки. Щось есте…
У дитячому застосунку з'явилася кнопка «Попросити гроші у батьків»
Раніше дитині треба було зловити батьків у правильний момент, попросити, пояснити, скільки і навіщо – це аж трохи набридало
Тепер все простіше. Дитина натискає кнопку, вказує суму і пише коментар – батьки отримують сповіщення і можуть скинути гроші або відхилити запит
У батьків є 24 години на відповідь. А у дітей не більше 5 запитів на день (щоб не…
Знаєте що?!
Менше ніж за дві доби понад ДЕСЯТЬ ТИСЯЧ клієнтів купили СІМНАДЦЯТЬ ТИСЯЧ книжок українських видавництв!!!
У мене знову немає слів.
Це так людяно💔
Впевнений, для видавництв ваша підтримка зараз безцінна. І насамперед тому, що вона показує їм, що те, що вони роблять, важливо і що ми не залишимо їх сам на сам із труднощами
————
Трохи статистики:
• Художня література - 50,1%
• Дитяча література - 17,7%
…
Цього вівторка у нас стало 11 мільйонів клієнтів, але через увесь цей треш, що відбувається навколо, ми навіть не звернули на це уваги
Дякую всім нашим клієнтам, хто нам довіряє, хто нас критикує, хто нас хвалить - усе це допомагає нам розвиватися
Дякую команді, яка щодня щось вигадує, експериментує, вилизує і не зупиняється ні на хвилину
Дякую ЗСУ, що дають нам можливість вести бізнес під час війни
Ми продовжуєм…
Сьогодні від руснявого шахеда постраждали понад 10 українських видавництв
Серед них «А-БА-БА-ГА-ЛА-МА-ГА», Artbooks, BookChef, «Видавництво Старого Лева», «Віхола», Vivat та багато інших. Взагалі за липень-серпень ворог спалив понад 13 мільйонів українських книжок. Нам дуже болить від цього😭
І дуже хочеться якось допомогти
Давайте разом підтримаємо українські видавництва! На monoмаркеті є 15 тисяч різних книжок. Ку…
Тепер на ВДНГ висить наш Кіт!
Ми профінансували створення павільйону "КІТ" і вирішили, що потрібно якось позначити нашу присутність.
Цікавий факт: він важить 250 кг, а його монтували та збирали протягом 47 днів.
Тож завітайте, щоб сфотографуватися, здається, вийшло стильно
1,76 млрд. за три дні!!!
Немає слів…
Це monoмаркет🔥
❤3,480🔥1,340👍267
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @OGoMono. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@OGoMono edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FEDOROV @zedigital · 216,374 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Останній Капіталіст ✙ @OstanniyCapitalist · 118,320 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Сергій Притула @serhiyprytula · 116,811 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
BRAMA @brama_channel · 110,947 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Дія @diia_gov · 129,666 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Головне управління розвідки МО України @DIUkraine · 224,527 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Канал Ростіка @crypto_rostik · 119,051 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Бро скинув мем @bromeeems · 314,375 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Укрзалізниця @UkrzalInfo · 238,571 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Лебидло @lebigaa · 421,162 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦 @deepstateua · 760,108 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Валерій Залужний @Zaluzhnui · 240,040 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Батальйон «Монако» | Україна | Новини @batalionmonako · 707,850 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Львівобленерго💡Новини @lvivoblenergo · 177,697 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
МАДЯР🇺🇦 @robert_magyar · 603,010 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine @itarmyofukraine2022 · 106,210 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
PVP.POLTAVA @poltava_pvp · 109,510 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
1-й корпус НГУ «Азов» @azov_media · 237,844 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології @serhii_flash · 167,719 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Український Наступ | #УкрТг ∆ @ukrnastup · 136,116 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
єСвітло💡Київ | Світло @esvitlo_kyiv_ua · 153,230 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Служба безпеки України @SBUkr · 296,778 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Прикарпаттяобленерго @prykarpattyaoblenergo_official · 110,928 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Киевский Движ @k_dvizh · 467,157 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 209 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Monobank (Ukraine)(en.wikipedia.org) “…join ''monobank''.
On October 11,{{Cite web |title=ОГо! |url=https://t.me/OGoMono/295 |access-date=2025-05-13 |website=Telegram}} ''monobank''…” read 13 September 2026
Monobank(uk.wikipedia.org) “…приєднатися до monobank.
11 жовтня monobank{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/OGoMono/295 |title=ОГо! |website=Telegram |access-date=2025-05-05}}…” read 13 September 2026
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОГо!” (@OGoMono), 648,179 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OGoMono.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.