Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “ОГо! 🐈” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
353,000 average views per post against 637,330 subscribers — an engagement rate of 55.4%. Across the 1,146 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,286–999,325 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.56% and 11.1%, with a median of 4.14%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
5,648,000
Mature posts only
57.4% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -28,892. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 631,940–669,500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 21:00
636,274
-338
8 Nov 2026, 09:50
636,612
-252
7 Nov 2026, 06:06
636,864
-227
6 Nov 2026, 02:17
637,091
-239
5 Nov 2026, 00:00
637,330
-189
4 Nov 2026, 00:16
637,519
-218
2 Nov 2026, 22:16
637,737
-56
2 Nov 2026, 01:28
637,793
-306
1 Nov 2026, 01:19
638,099
-281
31 Oct 2026, 00:19
638,380
-281
30 Oct 2026, 01:17
638,661
-230
29 Oct 2026, 03:11
638,891
-298
28 Oct 2026, 00:30
639,189
-362
27 Oct 2026, 00:55
639,551
-261
26 Oct 2026, 02:55
639,812
-271
25 Oct 2026, 03:18
640,083
-225
24 Oct 2026, 06:16
640,308
-225
23 Oct 2026, 07:25
640,533
-364
22 Oct 2026, 07:20
640,897
-391
21 Oct 2026, 04:07
641,288
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
56.0%
avg views ÷ 636,274 subscribers
Avg views / post
356,000
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
67 (15 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
4,990,000
Reactions total
87,851
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 02:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
826
Videos
203
Links
519
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 21s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
628,503 reactions across 66 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
392,595
62.5%
😁
110,511
17.6%
🔥
78,990
12.6%
👍
45,350
7.22%
🤬
1,057
0.168%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 640,655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Це корисно для тих, хто заробляє головою й не хоче возитися з окремим сайтом та бухгалтерією: блогерів, консультантів, викладачів, психологів
Консультація, курс, гайд чи лекція - збираєте всі свої продукти на одній сторінці, оформлюєте під себе й просто кидаєте посилання клієнтам. Вони купують, ви отримуєте гроші, а фіскальний чек формується сам
Усе дуже просто як для продавця, так і для покупця. Є відчуття, що інф…
Подарунки за ачівки!
Так само, як зазирнути під кришечку Coca-Cola, тільки в mono😉
Працює просто. До 30 листопада кожна виконана ачівка - нова чи чергове коло повторюваної - дає Таємний Бокс, з якого може випасти приз. Тобто що більше ачівок закриваєте, то більше у вас шансів
У боксах заховано 10 iPhone 18 Pro Max, 30 карток Platinum і 50 тисяч промокодів на monoмаркет. Виграють, авжеж, не всі, але шанси точно буд…
Завтра перше число, тож не забудьте обрати кешбек у mono
Там з’явилася нова категорія - «Штучний інтелект» із 10% кешбеку
Якщо ви вже платите за ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Midjourney, Grok, ElevenLabs чи Higgsfield AI, ваша підписка стала трохи дешевшою. А для тих, хто ще не користувався жодним із цих ШІ, - чудовий момент спробувати
А на заощаджені гроші можна і щось справжнє купити😉
Я з гарною новиною!
Уся техніка Xiaomi - від 20 платежів у Покупку Частинами! Коли кажу «уся», то маю на увазі всю-всю з екосистеми - Xiaomi, POCO, Mijia, Dreo та Roborock. Думаю, що серед усього цього точно є щось, на що ви задивлялися, але якось відкладали покупку
Тому не відкладайте! Акція діятиме до кінця тижня, тобто до 1 листопада
І, авжеж, підтримую традицію - діліться своїми покупками в Threads, а я подару…
Зробили так, щоб без вашого відома підписки раптово не зупинялися
Ми подивилися, через що найчастіше не проходять майбутні платежі, і тепер заздалегідь підсвічуємо проблему у виписці під карткою.
Бо, може, у вас просто закінчився інтернет-ліміт, спрацювали якісь налаштування безпеки або на картці трохи не вистачає коштів
Тепер усе можна виправити одним тапом на попередження - вас перекине в потрібний розділ налашт…
За вчора діти заробили 131 тисячу гривень
Загалом батьки створили для дітей 8,6 тисячі завдань. Якби діти виконали всі ці завдання, то могли б заробити 2 мільйони гривень
Серед усіх створених завдань:
• 56% — короткострокові
• 44% — довгострокові
P.S. Ми не читаємо завдання, які ви створюєте для своїх дітей, і не вказуємо вам, як їх виховувати. Ви самі вирішуєте, як користуватися цим інструментом
Дітям уже видали понад 3000 завдань! Оце так масштаби - ще трохи, і матимемо нову статтю ВВП!😂 Головне, щоб податкова не вирішила обкласти дитячі завдання податком😅
Домовленість «винесеш сміття - дам сотню» отримала офіційний статус. Бо для дитячих карток mono з’явилися завдання
Батьки створюють дитині завдання, встановлюють винагороду й дедлайн. Дитина бачить його у себе, виконує і тисне «Місію виконано»
Після цього треба тільки перевірити, що сміття справді винесене, а не переставлене в коридор. Далі батьки підтверджують виконання, і гроші падають на дитячу картку
Щоб було …
Мільйон клієнтів користуються monoКЕП!
Фізособи, ФОПи, директори компаній та їхні співробітники. Півтора року тому, коли ми запускали електронний підпис, я писав, що це зразок того, як складні речі робити просто. Схоже, це спрацювало. Випуск за хвилину, повністю безкоштовно
Цього тижня додали ще й електронну печатку ФОП для ПРРО. Вона там же, де й підпис
Складні речі мають бути простими.
Ми продовжуємо…
Транзакції тепер можна додавати в обране ⭐️
Наприклад, купили ви квиток на концерт. Сам файл квитка прикріпили до платежу, а платіж додали в обране. Коли прийдете на концерт, шукати квиток не доведеться, він уже в обраному. А якщо подію скасували, теж легко знайдете транзакцію для оформлення повернення
В обране можна додавати й будь-які інші важливі платежі, а до них додавати теги, описи, зображення та файли
Зіроч…
Хвилинка добрих новин
Закон про кримінальну відповідальність за участь у шахрайських кол-центрах уже дає перші відчутні результати
Ми бачимо це і за динамікою звернень постраждалих клієнтів, і за зростанням кількості безробітних барсеточників
Від сьогодні в mono-ecom з’явився власний публічний MCP-конектор:
mono-ecom
ai.monoecom.tech/mcp
Його можна додати до особистої підписки Claude чи ChatGPT і легко авторизуватися за номером телефону
Що можна робити:
monoмаркет:
• шукати та порівнювати товари
• керувати кошиком
• переглядати попередні замовлення
• для оформлення замовлення генерується посилання, яке одразу відкриває маркет на етапі оформлення замов…
❤3,180🔥1,170👍494😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @OGoMono. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@OGoMono edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @OGoMono as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
37 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FEDOROV @zedigital · 206,711 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Останній Капіталіст ✙ @OstanniyCapitalist · 118,188 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Сергій Притула @serhiyprytula · 114,205 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
BRAMA @brama_channel · 109,155 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Дія @diia_gov · 130,310 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Головне управління розвідки МО України @DIUkraine · 221,219 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Канал Ростіка @crypto_rostik · 117,114 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Бро скинув мем @bromeeems · 310,871 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Укрзалізниця @UkrzalInfo · 237,792 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Лебидло @lebigaa · 417,528 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦 @deepstateua · 751,483 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Валерій Залужний @Zaluzhnui · 240,863 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Батальйон Монако @batalionmonako · 712 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Львівобленерго💡Новини @lvivoblenergo · 181,303 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
МАДЯР🇺🇦 @robert_magyar · 601,465 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine @itarmyofukraine2022 · 105,797 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
PVP.POLTAVA @poltava_pvp · 110,194 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
1-й корпус НГУ «Азов» @azov_media · 234,799 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології @serhii_flash · 171,626 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Український Наступ | #УкрТг ∆ @ukrnastup · 132,921 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
єСвітло💡Київ | Світло @esvitlo_kyiv_ua · 168,231 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Служба безпеки України @SBUkr · 293,875 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Прикарпаттяобленерго @prykarpattyaoblenergo_official · 112,910 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Киевский Движ @k_dvizh · 471,209 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 209 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Monobank (Ukraine)(en.wikipedia.org) “…only in the mobile application.{{Cite web |title=ОГо! |url=https://t.me/OGoMono/295 |access-date=2025-05-13 |website=Telegram}}
=== 2020-2021…” read 1 November 2026
Monobank(uk.wikipedia.org) “…приєднатися до monobank.
11 жовтня monobank{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/OGoMono/295 |title=ОГо! |website=Telegram |access-date=2025-05-05}}…” read 1 November 2026
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОГо!” (@OGoMono), 636,274 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OGoMono.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.