Все працює! 🫡 Хто ще з банків встиг?;)
❤4,320🔥1,650👍546

Channel
@OGoMono
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
663,301subscribers
-1,865 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001272376023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OGoMono |
| Description | Блог Олега Гороховського |
| Created | 3 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OGoMono |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “ОГо! 🐈” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
418,000 average views per post against 663,301 subscribers — an engagement rate of 63.0%. Across the 1,134 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,245–999,955 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.80% and 12.6%, with a median of 4.63%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 7,525,000 |
| Mature posts only | 63.0% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 663,301 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b316228 · 1,134 channels · p10 0.563% · p25 1.80% · p50 4.63% · p75 12.6% · p90 26.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.117th percentile · 13.6× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.016% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Ukrainian · 94.4%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 663,301 | -405 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 663,706 | -421 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 664,127 | -220 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 664,347 | -294 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 664,641 | -286 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 664,927 | -239 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 665,166 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (15 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,525,000 |
| Reactions total | 285,140 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
272,988 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 152,426 | 55.8% | |
| 😁 | 76,572 | 28.0% | |
| 🔥 | 26,354 | 9.65% | |
| 👍 | 16,579 | 6.07% | |
| 🤬 | 1,057 | 0.387% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285,140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Все працює! 🫡 Хто ще з банків встиг?;)
❤4,320🔥1,650👍546
Це круто💪🏻 Працюємо сьогодні вночі, щоб завтра все запрацювало
❤4,000🔥946👍417
✅️ НБУ впроваджує великий пакет пом'якшення валютних обмежень із основним фокусом на підтримці населення. Пакет також містить важливі зміни для юридичних осіб та фінансового сектору. Зміни для фізичних осіб: 1️⃣ суттєво збільшуються ліміти на купівлю безготівкової іноземної валюти та розширюється перелік операцій, доступних у межах цього ліміту; 3️⃣ подвоюється ліміт на зняття готівкових коштів із валютних раху…
❤2,420👍552🔥303
Сьогодні у нас 500 000 ФОПів!!! Знаєте що зазвичай відбувається, коли відкриваєте ФОП? Вам одразу починають надзвонювати банки. Безліч пропозицій, «унікальних» умов та іншого «лишевнаса» А ми ще зі старту вирішили не дзвонити і не набридати. Виходить, 500 тисяч підприємців обрали mono без жодного дзвінка!!! Приємно❤️ Дякуємо за довіру!!! Працюємо далі!
❤12,600🔥2,170👍1,050
Перезапускаємо шкільний комплект mono Щоденник + 10 зошитів + наліпки для кастомізації, щоб дитина могла сама вирішити, який вигляд вони матимуть. А ще на зошитах є QR-коди, за якими можна отримати нові секретні скіни, бо бачимо, що дітям подобається! Ціна за все - 550 грн. Або можете розділити оплату на 10 частин і платити по 55 грн 😁 Минулого року продали 5 000 наборів за 4 години. Тож цього разу в нас заготован…
❤3,040🔥825👍381
Тепер до транзакції можна прикріпити фото чека чи покупки Корисно, якщо треба не загубити чек або ви швидко забуваєте, на що витратили кошти😁 Ну або ж якщо даєте доступ до картки близьким чи асистентам
👍5,070🔥1,840❤889
А ще вирішили зробити на Маркеті від 20 платежів на все для відпочинку - до 2 серпня! Вже минуло майже дві третини літа, тож хочемо зробити це для вас доступнішим, поки є умови. Шукайте будь-що для спорту, активного відпочинку чи садівництва або навіть замовляйте електротранспорт Ну і за традицією діліться своїми покупками в Threads, а я оберу десять із них і оплачу їх за вас😉
❤1,910🔥495👍212😁112
Пам'ятаєте ж, що у нас при переказах на картки можна писати коментар? Так от, побачили декілька дописів, де клієнти скаржаться, що їхні колишні (заблоковані всюди) починають писати їм через mono Тому презентуємо нову функцію - заблокувати колишнього😁 Насправді тепер банити можна будь-кого, чиї перекази вам чомусь набридають. Зробити це можна в деталях переказу. Але я б не зловживав функцією, бо не так багато людей…
😁13,300❤1,970🔥754👍360
Хто ще не бачив - до завтра на monoмаркеті до 25 платежів на Dreame Тобто всі товари бренду можна розбити на мінімум 20 частин, максимум - на 25! Нагадую, що це все без відсотків, тобто ви заплатите ту ціну, яка вказана, просто поступово. Наприклад, замість 6 000 грн одразу можна платити по 300 грн на місяць Продажів за два дні вже в 1,5 раза більше, ніж за весь минулий місяць! Тож покваптеся, якщо вам треба щось д…
🔥2,100❤637👍281😁4
Увага, це не навчання, а шанс працювати в mono! Вже двічі запускали ШІнтернатуру. Це коли ми відбираємо найкращих, а потім вони три місяці фултайм працюють з менторами над реальними завданнями, а не навчальними болванками. І дивимося, хто зможе впоратися. Тих, хто впорався, забираємо в команду Усе оплачується. Працювати можна дистанційно, але якщо хочеться, приходьте в офіс у Києві чи Дніпрі За два попередні набор…
❤3,040🔥750👍421😁7
ДРАПАТИЙ — ГОЛОВНОКОМАНДУВАЧ ЗБРОЙНИХ СИЛ УКРАЇНИ!!!
❤20,400🔥5,240👍1,520🤬168
Як це все можливо?! Досить політики. Ми всі хочемо одного. Нам потрібно досягти справедливого миру. Нам потрібні найкращі на кожній ділянці нашої боротьби. Федоров має працювати заради нашої перемоги. Це питання існування країни!
❤22,200😁10,600🔥2,110👍1,330
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @OGoMono. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 4,616 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 142 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОГо!” (@OGoMono), 663,301 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OGoMono.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.