Офіційний канал 1 корпусу НГУ «Азов».
Вступити до лав: https://azov.link/4ns4D5l
Фонд підтримки корпусу: https://azov.link/4dQ8PIW
Підтримати бригаду «Азов»: https://go.azov.one/
Сайт: https://azov.link/4u7pMEw
Пресслужба: https://azov.link/3PE2tmB
Created
17 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -695. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241,284–242,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:55
241,388
-145
11 Aug 2026, 11:58
241,533
-82
10 Aug 2026, 11:52
241,615
-113
9 Aug 2026, 09:51
241,728
-113
8 Aug 2026, 11:56
241,841
-85
7 Aug 2026, 15:04
241,926
-78
6 Aug 2026, 18:25
242,004
-79
6 Aug 2026, 00:54
242,083
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 241,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
46,200
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
8 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
369,200
Reactions total
11,351
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,640
Videos
≈684
Links
≈1,750
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 04s
Average length
1m 49s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,351 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,114
71.5%
👍
2,212
19.5%
🔥
1,025
9.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,351reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
72
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 8 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
27
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @azov_media. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У майбутнього, за яке ми щодня йдемо у бій, є імена. У нього є мрії.
Є переживання, надії та напрочуд дорослі думки. Ворог хоче забрати все це, знищити, не дати нашому майбутньому прорости.
Але у нашого майбутнього, яке лише робить перші кроки у цьому житті й потребує захисту, є ми. І є наш обов'язок зробити все, щоб дати цим мріям можливість здійснитись.
Це — наші діти. Заради їхніх усмішок, очей та дзвінких голо…
Run The Line – від Антарктиди до Японії, від Данії до Австралії.
Благодійний забіг Run The Line, організований 1-м корпусом НГУ «Азов» і Lotus Fund, об'єднав цього року людей на різних континентах. Учасники долучалися до великих забігів або організовували локальні заходи.
Окрім вираження солідарності та привернення уваги по всьому світу до українських військовополонених, учасники забігу та партнери також зібрали ко…
7 серпня — День пам’яті полеглих бійців 20-ї бригади «Любарт».
Цього дня ми згадуємо імена тих, хто віддав життя у боротьбі за Україну. Для бригади вони назавжди залишаються побратимами — частиною нашої історії, нашого братерства і нашого строю.
Пам’ять — це не лише скорбота. Це відповідальність живих: продовжувати боротьбу, берегти те, за що вони стояли, і довести до кінця справу, за яку вони віддали найдорожче.
…
Одна секунда звʼязку може коштувати одного життя
Поки піхота виконує бойові завдання, а оператори БпЛА працюють по цілях, звʼязківці забезпечують те, без чого неможливе управління боєм.
Вони розгортають точки ретрансляції, підтримують стійкий радіозвʼязок та щоразу знаходять рішення там, де противник намагається залишити наших бійців без комунікації.
Їм часто доводиться заходити найпершими, підкоряти найвищі точки…
Азовці памʼятають, чиї вони діти
Руки українців завжди вміли й виростити хліб, і взяти зброю, щоб його захистити. Ми не забуваємо, заради кого боремося, і хто потребує не лише захисту, а й підтримки.
Прифронтові села часто залишаються під загрозою обстрілів та без продуктів першої необхідності. До жителів одного з таких сіл вже не вперше приїхали військовослужбовці відділення цивільно-військового співробітництва «А…
⚒️ «Шахтар» та «Азов» 🇺🇦 підписали Меморандум про співпрацю 🤝
Футбольний клуб і корпус Нацгвардії об’єднають зусилля в допомозі військовим та їхнім родинам.
ФК «Шахтар» та 1-й корпус Національної гвардії України «Азов» підписали Меморандум про співпрацю. Урочиста церемонія відбулася 3 серпня, у перерві матчу чемпіонату України «Шахтар» – «Кудрівка». Свої підписи під Меморандумом поставили спортивний директор «Шахта…
«Азов» представляє: «Роккі: Останній бій».
Коли росіянин досягає соціального дна, перед ним часто виникає примарна перспектива заробітку – контракт з зс рф.
Та як би він не тренувався, як би не готувався до штурму – в смузі відповідальності 1-го корпусу НГУ «Азов» золоту медаль він отримає лише посмертно.
Перегони з FPV – це один з видів спорту, де матчі зазвичай завершуються перемогою господарів поля.
🦅Приєднуйс…
Новобранці та діючі бійці «Азову» провели містерію, присвячену пам'яті загиблих під час теракту в Оленівці.
В ніч проти 29 липня бійці 1-го корпусу НГУ «Азов» організували особливу містерію в пам’ять побратимів, що загинули від рук росіян в Оленівці.
«В цю ніч ми згадуємо не тільки наших побратимів, які загинули в Оленівці. На жаль, цей список не завершений. За останній рік троє наших побратимів загинули в полоні. …
❤1,390👍197🔥89
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @azov_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 826 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 49 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Україна Online: Новини | Політика @UaOnlii · 1,561,387#78
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Третій армійський корпус @ab3army · 275,800 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
МАДЯР🇺🇦 @robert_magyar · 600,287 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Валерій Залужний @Zaluzhnui · 223,287 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
WarLife 18+ Украина Россия Война 18+ @Voyna18 · 198,005 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
К-2 @k_2army · 161,319 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Служба безпеки України @SBUkr · 299,546 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Головне управління розвідки МО України @DIUkraine · 226,590 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Бавовна @ukrbavovna · 643,015 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС @ButusovPlus · 347,646 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Zelenskiy / Official @v_zelenskiy_official · 673,747 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Бахмутський Демон 👹 @bahshiddemon · 171,857 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
FEDOROV @zedigital · 248,988 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Говорять Снайпер ꑭ @stanislav_osman · 293,350 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
STERNENKO @ssternenko · 896,019 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології @serhii_flash · 166,174 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦 @deepstateua · 764,562 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Denys Davydov @pilotblog · 201,319 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Переверзєв Василь(uk.wikipedia.org) “…[[Файне місто (фестиваль)|«Faine Misto»]] 2024{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/azov_media/6091|назва=«В нас тоді був кураж. Кожен виліт були ураження окупантів»…” read 9 August 2026
Прозак (гурт)(uk.wikipedia.org) “…мобілізувався до бригади [[Бригада НГУ «Азов»|АЗОВ]]{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/azov_media/6091|назва=«В нас тоді був кураж. Кожен виліт були ураження окупантів»…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1-й корпус НГУ «Азов»” (@azov_media), 241,388 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azov_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
