Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бойцовский куб

Channel

Бойцовский куб

@mneetotmirabsolutnoneponyaten

Not marked by Telegram, checked 21 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

162subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002181927134
TypeChannel
Username@mneetotmirabsolutnoneponyaten
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 24 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mneetotmirabsolutnoneponyaten

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1621661647 August 2026 — 166 subscribers8 August 2026 — 166 subscribers15 August 2026 — 165 subscribers30 August 2026 — 164 subscribers9 September 2026 — 162 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 161–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 04:16162-2
30 Aug 2026, 07:52164-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:16165-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:47166no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:32166first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

533 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤30156.5%
🤡18334.3%
🤣387.13%
💩112.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 533 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 13 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mneetotmirabsolutnoneponyaten. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 September 2024 to 13 October 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2024, 07:36 UTC398 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бойцы UFC, получающие бонус $40к за лучший бой вечера

❤14🤡7🤣3

Signed Александр Мучаев

13 Oct 2024, 06:50 UTC398 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Учитесь делать бабки. Бивол и Бетербиев получат по $10 млн за бой. А вот британский цыган Тайсон Фьюри, который весной проиграл украинцу Усику, получил за это порядка £160 млн, когда Усик выиграл и забрал всего ~£60 млн

❤16🤡7💩1

Signed Vasily Bisti

13 Oct 2024, 04:58 UTC343 views32 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Мужики, вы можете быль сколько угодно успешными, известными, популярными и т.д. Но стоит вам связать жизнь с ебанутой женщиной — это конец. Сегодня состоялся супербой за звание абсолютно чемпиона мира по боксу в полутяжелой весовой. Встретились два россиянина: киргиз Дмитрий Бивол (33 года) и родившийся в Дагестане чеченец Артур Бетербиев (39 лет). Бой был очень равным, но победу присудили Бетербиеву решением судей.…

❤19🤡11🤣2

Signed Vasily Bisti

6 Oct 2024, 15:09 UTC294 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Выходные уже заканчиваются, а у Яндекса есть специальное предложение

❤14🤡11

Signed Vasily Bisti

1 Oct 2024, 13:23 UTC343 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @stepk_dyobk

Список организаций, которые потеряли сотни сотрудников за несколько минут: 1. ABBYY 2. Хезболла

❤13🤡8

Signed George Lobushkin

1 Oct 2024, 07:00 UTC340 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ia_panorama

«Да, скуфы мы, с обвисшими и дряблыми телами»: опубликован авторский вариант стихотворения Александра Блока Текст: Павел Скородумов

❤17🤡8

Signed George Lobushkin

30 Sept 2024, 17:57 UTC297 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пацаны, всем кто не спит в девять вечера, привет

❤14🤡8🤣2

Signed George Lobushkin

28 Sept 2024, 08:45 UTC290 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А есть хоть какое-то документальное доказательство, что Иирна Болгар умеет говорить ртом?

❤15🤡8🤣2

Signed George Lobushkin

28 Sept 2024, 07:40 UTC287 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новый день — новое напоминание мировому сообществу

❤18🤡8🤣2

Signed George Lobushkin

27 Sept 2024, 15:21 UTC244 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем хороших выходных

❤14🤡7💩4🤣3

Signed George Lobushkin

26 Sept 2024, 15:20 UTC234 views29 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Твой друг представляет тебя любой компании новых людей.

❤19🤡10

Signed MakarVv

26 Sept 2024, 11:23 UTC233 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Эксперты: «Ипотечного пузыря не существует». Ипотечный пузырь: «Согласен». Заемщик с 26 ипотеками: «Пофиг, вывезу как-нибудь».

❤18🤡11🤣2

Signed MakarVv

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mneetotmirabsolutnoneponyaten. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MORGUN
@MorgunMaria · 45,731
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
Лобушкин
@lobushkin · 100,243
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бойцовский куб” (@mneetotmirabsolutnoneponyaten), 162 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mneetotmirabsolutnoneponyaten.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.