Яндекс методично затягивает гайки. Видимо, слабо покупают доп.место на Диске. Ждем продолжения. @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60420294293019731882custom 58818062111956059081

Channel
@thensmith
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
142subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001745346005 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thensmith |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thensmith |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 142 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 140 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 140 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5938368005611195877 | 26 | 24.5% | |
| custom 6028315147754278596 | 24 | 22.6% | |
| custom 6043847274210005137 | 19 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5881806211195605908 | 13 | 12.3% | |
| custom 6041720006973067267 | 9 | 8.49% | |
| custom 6042029429301973188 | 8 | 7.55% | |
| custom 5994417835630137549 | 7 | 6.60% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Яндекс методично затягивает гайки. Видимо, слабо покупают доп.место на Диске. Ждем продолжения. @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60420294293019731882custom 58818062111956059081
Домен t.me, принадлежащий Telegram, перестал работать. Как следует из данных Whois, администрация реестра .me полностью удалила его из DNS-зоны. Хмм… UPD: Домен восстановили. Причина удаления: у какой-то организации из санкционных списков в качестве сайта был указан канал в телеграм. Ну что тут скажешь… @thenSmith | MAX
custom 58818062111956059081custom 60420294293019731881
❗️Власти замедляют мобильный интернет По данным СМИ, скорость мобильного интернета теперь ниже, чем в Казахстане, Камбодже и Румынии. Даже в крупных городах наблюдаются проблемы с качеством мобильной связи. Власти фактически не одобряют развитие инфраструктуры сотовой связи. Согласование строительства одной базовой станции теперь занимает более 500 дней. Так, например, из-за бюрократии и запретов в Лондоне уже нес…
custom 60417200069730672672
Неужели кто-то еще ведется на такие сообщения? Почему их до сих пор рассылают. Индира, она же Герман, видимо, не в курсе, что мои сайты и без сопливых на первой странице Яндекса. @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60438472742100051375
Они еще и живут по 60 лет @thenSmith | MAX
custom 58818062111956059084custom 59383680056111958771custom 60438472742100051371
И снова семиклассники резвятся в РИА Новости за сумму порядка 60 тысяч долларов #учимрусский #обзираяновости @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60283151477542785963custom 60438472742100051372custom 59383680056111958771
Цирк на Цветном бульваре не перестает удивлять @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60283151477542785965custom 59944178356301375491custom 60417200069730672671
2/7 — это как? С 11:00 до 13:00, без перерывов и выходных? @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60283151477542785963custom 58818062111956059081custom 60438472742100051371
Неправда. Сеньор бы обоих припахал, пока сам себе готовил. @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60438472742100051376custom 59383680056111958771custom 59944178356301375491
Просто красивый советский поезд. На ходу. @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60417200069730672673custom 59383680056111958772custom 58818062111956059081
Факт: Умные люди говорят, что, если идет серия новостей на новую тему, то кто-то пытается разогнать какой-то процесс. Вопрос: Почему вдруг появились публикации про шаровые молнии? Про нее же с 90-х годов ничего не было - Шаровая молния проходит через закрытое окно - Шаровая молния легко может попасть в дом через дымоход @thenSmith | MAX
custom 59383680056111958773
Прямо из-под знака? Ничего страшного @thenSmith | MAX
custom 60420294293019731883custom 59383680056111958772custom 58818062111956059081
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @thensmith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 599,182 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@thensmith named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Денис Коваленко” (@thensmith), 142 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thensmith.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.