Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stalag Null

@stalagnull

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27,536subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001126040115
TypeChannel
Username@stalagnull
Description• канал Софии Широгоровой • военная история ХХ в., war & violence studies • 36 часов лекций о современных конфликтах и военной истории + патронский чат: https://boosty.to/stalagnull https://www.buymeacoffee.com/shirogorova • связь: @Crni_bombarder_1918
Created6 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stalagnull

Growth

27,50627,54427,5256 August 2026 — 27,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,513 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,511 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,516 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,532 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,544 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,540 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,536 subscribers27,5366 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,500–27,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5527,536-4
11 Aug 2026, 19:3227,540-4
10 Aug 2026, 16:3827,544+12
9 Aug 2026, 15:1427,532+16
8 Aug 2026, 15:4627,516+5
7 Aug 2026, 15:1427,511-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:4027,513+7
6 Aug 2026, 09:1527,506first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.1%
avg views ÷ 27,536 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,900
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held15 (8 May 202625 July 2026)
Views total14,900
Reactions total1,041
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
403
Videos
1
Links
88

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

10,839 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,08846.9%
👍2,02618.7%
🔥1,27911.8%
😁1,26711.7%
🤔2852.63%
😢2161.99%
🕊1821.68%
custom 59177879053082340801341.24%
👎1221.13%
🤯780.72%
🥴560.517%
💅260.24%
💔230.212%
🫡230.212%
🌚210.194%
😱130.12%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,839reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
329
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 14 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
61
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stalagnull. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC≈14,900 views1,041 reactions61 Starsread 13 August 2026

(в сторону: про "Одиссею" Нолана – Нолан-то внезапно на нашу территорию зашел; постараюсь без, кхм, спойлеров) Удивительно: насколько далеки оказались все споры и претензии в интернете от, собственно, содержания фильма; что-то это да говорит об уровне дискуссий в наше время. Нолан, вопреки ожиданиям, вообще не стал снимать историческое кино. Подход так-то абсолютно оправданный – материал "Одиссеи" не предполагает п

635🔥163👍118👎38🤔38🥴24🕊10custom 59177879053082340807

26 Jun 2026, 05:49 UTC≈56,900 views1,433 reactions36 Starsread 13 August 2026

3/3 Вмешательство Гитлера в военное планирование было, как всегда, решающим. Генштаб сухопутных войск в лице своего начальника, Франца Гальдера, считал, что надо всеми силами стремиться к Москве и состредоточиться на ее захвате. Гитлера это не впечатлило. Он решил, что Москва не так важна: а надо сперва занять важные промышленные центры, Украину (Украина была идеей фикс), ну и другие богатые ресурсами территории. Т

725👍433🔥134🤔53👎35custom 591778790530823408021🤯13🥴11

26 Jun 2026, 05:46 UTC≈46,700 views999 reactions33 Starsread 13 August 2026

2/3 После Маркса аналогичное задание получил генерал Бернхард фон Лоссберг. Он работал подольше, и использовал как наработки своего предшественника, так и указания начальства. Общая концепция у Лоссберга, впрочем, вышла похожая: только теперь вместо двух групп армий действовали три. Две к северу от Припятских болот, одна – к югу. Кроме того, в отличие от Маркса, Лоссберг меньше значения уделял Москве, а больше дума

462👍246🔥128😁75🤯44🤔16custom 591778790530823408015👎9

26 Jun 2026, 05:43 UTC≈48,100 views887 reactions32 Starsread 13 August 2026

1/3 На германское вторжение 22 июня 1941 мы привыкли смотреть с советской стороны. Потому и обсуждаем исключительно ее, эту самую советскую сторону. Готов ли был СССР к войне? Если нет, то как так? Если да, то чем объяснить отступление до самой Москвы и чудовищные потери? Однако картина выглядит совсем иначе, если перевернуть ее — и поглядеть на вторжение с германской стороны. Главная мысль, которая после такого уп

👍485205🔥92custom 591778790530823408031🤔30👎18🤯16😁10

26 Jun 2026, 05:42 UTC≈42,500 views279 reactions17 Starsread 13 August 2026

(обсуждение бед военного планирования с редрумом @redroomtext поселило во мне неудержимое желание написать о германском планировании "Барбароссы", за что и извиняюсь — уж слишком я люблю тему "планирования неудачных кампаний". Список литературы выложу попозже, в смысле, откуда данные и огрызки цитат)

183👍52🔥21🫡11custom 59177879053082340809😁3

19 Jun 2026, 07:08 UTC≈27,200 views586 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Всем остальным – бесконечный профиль Муссолини 1933 года из Imperial War Museum. Справа фотка моя!

🔥35787😁81👍20custom 591778790530823408015🌚14😱7👎4

16 Jun 2026, 05:54 UTC≈69,100 views637 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Вычитала тут, что генерал Эрих Маркс – автор первого плана кампании против СССР, легшего в основу "Барбароссы" – в работе над планом опирался на "Поход за Вислу" Михаила Тухачевского. В целом, идея понятна: на что-то опираться надо. Плюс театр боевых действий изучить, все дела. Но у нас книжка 1923 года о кампании 1920-го – для кампании 1941, спустя два десятилетия радикальных преобразований и самого Советского союза

😁449🔥87👍3932🤔14🥴9👎4😱2

10 Jun 2026, 06:10 UTC≈34,200 views876 reactions54 Starsread 13 August 2026

В современной литературе все чаще отходят от позиции, будто Австро-Венгрия была исторически обречена, и ее распад в результате ПМВ – закономерный и неизбежный итог. Чаще пишут о сильных сторонах империи – о ее разнообразии, устойчивой конституционной традиции, сильном гражданском обществе. Много внимания уделяют и тому, что А.-В. была империей, умевшей поддерживать этническое и национальное разнообразие в том числе н

463😢166🤔77👍52😁36🕊30🔥22custom 591778790530823408015

29 May 2026, 05:44 UTC≈33,900 views1,006 reactions34 Starsread 13 August 2026

Пока болею, читаю "Анатомию фашизма" Роберта Пакстона — у книги репутация одного из лучших обобщающих исследований по теме. (Репутация, на мой взгляд, совершенно заслуженная.) Так вот, Пакстон называет именно Первую мировую той исторической катастрофой, которая породила фашизм. Поспорить с этим сложно; в современной исторической науке это широко признаннный тезис. Но интересно, на что именно Пакстон — как исследоват

577👍221🕊104😢45🤔26💔13🔥7custom 59177879053082340805

24 May 2026, 06:02 UTC≈27,800 views1,328 reactions50 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, у хозяйки канала ДР! Провожу его в смирении: заболела, не успела написать всякие интересные тексты сюда, да и в целом – в мае болеть тоскливо. Но что поделать! Поэтому вот я сего дня в зеркале, а рядышком я же, но с обложки книги 1911 года. Очень рада, что вы есть, дорогие читательницы и читатели, и что вас так немало! (Для душного-то канала) Хороший день, чтобы напомнить: можно подписаться на бусти или bmac

1,030🔥162👍63🕊27💅19custom 591778790530823408014🫡7👎2

18 May 2026, 06:35 UTC≈47,300 views710 reactions7 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Самая смешная вещь, которую я увидела в рассекреченных американских документах об НЛО – это записка генералу Лемэю, мол, "летающие тарелки, такие-то и такого-то вида, это не ваше??" На что бедняга Лемэй отвечает: нет, не наше. Вроде и понятная процедура: прежде, чем подозревать инопланетян, выяснить, не понаделали ли в соседнем ведомстве вундервафель (все же на дворе 1947, и вера в вундервафли сильна по понятным пр

😁54979👍47🔥18💅7🌚6👎4

13 May 2026, 16:00 UTCviews —

Stalag Null pinned «Многие удивляются тому, как провоенные силы могут выступать против правительства, начавшего и ведущего эту самую войну. Однако в истории масса тому примеров. Далеко даже ходить не надо: собственно российская история тут тоже кое-что может рассказать. Февраль…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @stalagnull. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 199,730 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stalag Null” (@stalagnull), 27,536 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stalagnull.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.