Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
35,200 average views per post against 37,080 subscribers — an engagement rate of 94.8%. Across the 8,376 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.02% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
39 of 39 published in the window (0 exact, 39 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,371,300
Mature posts only
94.8% over 39 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,880–37,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 21:40
37,080
-15
19 Sept 2026, 03:19
37,095
+1
16 Sept 2026, 20:20
37,094
-9
15 Sept 2026, 00:41
37,103
-9
13 Sept 2026, 09:37
37,112
-7
11 Sept 2026, 13:58
37,119
+9
8 Sept 2026, 22:37
37,110
+1
5 Sept 2026, 15:55
37,109
+46
3 Sept 2026, 17:41
37,063
+2
2 Sept 2026, 10:04
37,061
+1
1 Sept 2026, 07:14
37,060
+18
31 Aug 2026, 04:25
37,042
+17
30 Aug 2026, 06:32
37,025
+15
29 Aug 2026, 03:45
37,010
+46
28 Aug 2026, 03:23
36,964
-5
26 Aug 2026, 08:45
36,969
-12
25 Aug 2026, 08:42
36,981
-2
24 Aug 2026, 10:47
36,983
-4
22 Aug 2026, 18:35
36,987
-8
21 Aug 2026, 07:03
36,995
first reading
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
95.0%
avg views ÷ 37,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
35,200
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
95 (26 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
1,373,200
Reactions total
38,482
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 03:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,890
Videos
≈393
Links
≈645
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 56s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
97,932 reactions across 95 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5328162850609315086
44,431
45.4%
custom 5199542774961037309
23,894
24.4%
custom 5193042535232070272
10,634
10.9%
custom 5413632596720500868
10,544
10.8%
custom 5190879387838344658
5,702
5.82%
custom 5193039391316009760
2,727
2.78%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97,932 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,141
across the posts below
Posts paid on
77
of 95 we hold a reading for · 81%
Most on one post
307
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GGufen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 95 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я специально не играл в Warhammer 40000 Space Marine потому что эта игра полностью плагиатит стилистику StarCraft, теперь наконец-то с кайфом смогу пострелять в оригинальный лицензионный StarCraft Dominion, а не подделку
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @GGufen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бэбэй @bebeychick · 91,184 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
Добродвач @dobro_2ch · 89,899 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
БУГУРТ ТРЕД @bugurtthread · 22,184 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 September 2026
Майзенберг @meizzenberg · 41,810 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
CustomStories @customstories · 37,372 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
MovieBlog 🎥 @themovieblogteam · 33,551 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Коммандер @ilya_commander · 48,347 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Храм Жубана @zhubanoir · 34,348 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Свежая Булдка @buldj · 86,022 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Мои любимые юморески @myfavoritejumoreski · 79,480 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
Ретро Игры / Pixel_Devil @pxldevil · 20,709 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
Каргас @kargacc · 99,030 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026
Disgusting Men @disgustingmen · 21,748 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
мемы про котов (по ржать) @memyprokotow · 21,553 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
CONWAY @conway671games · 44,747 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Ремонтяш @realremontyash · 57,313 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
Кристина Шерман | Меняю голос как перчатки @trixie_vox · 21,131 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
DeadP47 @deadp47gaymer · 151,336 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Врата Оргриммара | WarCraft @vrata_orgrimmara · 22,220 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
Игровой Канал Блэка [BlackUFA] 🎮 @blackufa_official · 52,510 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
StopGame.ru @stopgameru · 82,728 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Мэмисон (поиск мемов) @memsearch · 47,429 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
Подсосов Мэда Тред @podsos_club · 34,753 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 3 September 2026
SonnyK @sonnyk1997 · 44,486 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гуфовский” (@GGufen), 37,080 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GGufen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
