Channel
@GGufen
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
36,922subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001455506554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GGufen |
| Created | 8 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GGufen |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
30,100 average views per post against 36,922 subscribers — an engagement rate of 81.5%. Across the 7,904 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,961 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.93% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.4%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 842,820 |
| Mature posts only | 86.9% over 25 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 36,922 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 7,904 channels · p10 2.39% · p25 4.93% · p50 10.4% · p75 21.0% · p90 37.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.190th percentile · 7.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.08% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 36,922 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 36,940 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 36,939 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 36,942 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 36,948 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 | 36,949 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 36,953 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 36,954 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (26 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 842,820 |
| Reactions total | 28,676 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28,676 reactions across 28 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5328162850609315086 | 13,565 | 47.3% | |
| custom 5199542774961037309 | 5,746 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5413632596720500868 | 3,533 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5193042535232070272 | 3,155 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5190879387838344658 | 2,092 | 7.30% | |
| custom 5193039391316009760 | 585 | 2.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,676reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GGufen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Если вам понравился Invite, то вот еще два кайфовых фильма про куко... всмысле про биопроблемы
custom 5328162850609315086171custom 519304253523207027232custom 519954277496103730915custom 54136325967205008688custom 51908793878383446586custom 51930393913160097606
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 5190879387838344658350custom 5199542774961037309153custom 5328162850609315086113custom 519304253523207027241custom 541363259672050086824custom 519303939131600976019
Invite прекрасен, все там прекрасны, но Оливия Уайлд просто восторг
custom 5328162850609315086369custom 5193042535232070272111custom 519087938783834465838custom 519954277496103730919custom 519303939131600976011custom 541363259672050086810
Если Окно Овертона не существует то как вы объясните популярность малины в шоколаде по 1000 рублей за 100 грамм?
custom 5328162850609315086544custom 5413632596720500868135custom 519304253523207027259custom 519954277496103730926custom 519087938783834465813custom 51930393913160097607
Я настолько тупой, что только к финальной серии Дома Дракона понял, что в заставке показывают её вышивку
custom 5328162850609315086511custom 5199542774961037309125custom 519087938783834465859custom 519304253523207027233custom 541363259672050086812custom 519303939131600976011
Мне презентовали этот комикс так: "Прикол в том что ты читаешь и думаешь что это написала 20-летняя девушка, а на самом деле его написала... 35-летняя девушка!" Шок!
custom 5199542774961037309692custom 5328162850609315086199custom 519304253523207027263custom 541363259672050086829custom 519087938783834465820custom 519303939131600976011
Как вам моя новая девушка? (Я слева)
custom 51995427749610373091,000custom 5328162850609315086236custom 5193042535232070272164custom 541363259672050086835custom 519087938783834465831custom 519303939131600976015
Продавщица в пивнухе не смогла выговорить название пива, мне кажется увольнять таких надо за профнепригодность
custom 5413632596720500868601custom 5328162850609315086207custom 519954277496103730989custom 519304253523207027249custom 519087938783834465814custom 519303939131600976014
Придумал игру в которой нужно убивать старух, как вам идея?
custom 5199542774961037309745custom 5328162850609315086277custom 5193042535232070272115custom 541363259672050086854custom 519087938783834465838custom 519303939131600976024
Посмотрел тут большой видос (американский) про амэриканские школы, мол, школьники не способны написать даже пару предложений, старшеклассники не умеют читать сложные слова, даже если ничего не делать тебе поставят минимальную тройку, учителей избивают А у нас в школах сейчас как?
custom 5328162850609315086610custom 519304253523207027282custom 541363259672050086867custom 519087938783834465826custom 519954277496103730919custom 519303939131600976010
мнэ кажется главный вопрос не в том почему колобок собирает мало а в том почему чебурашка собрал много
custom 5328162850609315086914custom 5413632596720500868111custom 519954277496103730959custom 519304253523207027241custom 519087938783834465821custom 519303939131600976013
Мы?
custom 53281628506093150861,050custom 5413632596720500868297custom 5193042535232070272155custom 519087938783834465835custom 519303939131600976029custom 519954277496103730928
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @GGufen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 146,050 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гуфовский” (@GGufen), 36,922 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GGufen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.