Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 12 days, net -3,762. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 357,968–362,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 18:17
358,532
-350
16 Aug 2026, 16:23
358,882
-453
15 Aug 2026, 00:25
359,335
-399
13 Aug 2026, 14:36
359,734
-345
12 Aug 2026, 15:27
360,079
-261
11 Aug 2026, 18:32
360,340
-370
10 Aug 2026, 19:28
360,710
-387
9 Aug 2026, 18:43
361,097
-263
8 Aug 2026, 20:55
361,360
-283
7 Aug 2026, 21:58
361,643
-335
6 Aug 2026, 21:18
361,978
-309
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
362,287
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:45
362,287
-7
5 Aug 2026, 22:21
362,294
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.54%
avg views ÷ 358,532 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,530
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
75 (31 July 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
414,890
Reactions total
20,969
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,500
Videos
≈149
Links
≈1,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
41s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,896 reactions across 65 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,558
19.9%
🔥
2,954
16.5%
❤
2,707
15.1%
👌
1,335
7.46%
😱
1,296
7.24%
🤯
1,111
6.21%
🤔
954
5.33%
👏
818
4.57%
🌚
488
2.73%
💯
409
2.29%
⚡
399
2.23%
🙈
379
2.12%
🤡
357
1.99%
🤣
348
1.94%
🗿
157
0.877%
🎉
147
0.821%
🤩
141
0.788%
🤝
132
0.738%
😍
99
0.553%
🥴
67
0.374%
3 further kinds
40
0.224%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,969reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 75 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rb_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
2ГИС изменил систему рейтингов — теперь важнее отзывы тех, кто действительно был в заведении 📍
При расчёте оценки сервис начал учитывать отзывы пользователей, чьё посещение можно подтвердить геолокацией или данными об оплате. Рейтинг компании появится после десяти таких отзывов.
Неподтверждённые отзывы удаляться не будут, но по умолчанию они окажутся ниже подтверждённых.
↗️ В карточках компаний также появилась син…
Россияне наторговали фьючерсами почти на 2 трлн ₽ — и это только за выходные 📈
Мосбиржа подвела итоги первого года торгов на срочном рынке по субботам и воскресеньям. В общей сложности на выходные пришлось 3,8% от объёма основной сессии, или 1,7 трлн рублей за год.
Чаще всего инвесторы торговали фьючерсами на нефть Brent, золото и Индекс МосБиржи.
🔁 Читайте на Russian Business
@rb_ru
«Камаз» начал разработку беспилотных автобусов 🚌
Как сообщили в компании, выводить транспорт на дороги планируют постепенно — по мере испытания технологии.
➡️ Первые тесты беспилотных автобусов могут пройти в Москве, Санкт-Петербурге и на Дальнем Востоке. Конкретных сроков запуска пока нет.
При этом Минэкономики уже подготовило поправки, которые позволят перевозить пассажиров на автобусах и маршрутках без водителя…
«Союзмультфильм» выиграл спор с Минкультуры на 131 млн ₽ 🎬
Ведомство требовало вернуть 60 млн рублей, выделенных на модернизацию студии, и выплатить ещё 71 млн рублей — за пользование средствами. Арбитражный суд Москвы полностью отклонил иск.
В «Союзмультфильме» объяснили, что фактически не получили субсидию. В 2015 году деньги перечислили через «Банк Российский Кредит», но он обанкротился до того, как студия смогл…
Канье Уэст впервые выступит в России 🎫
Концерты рэпера пройдут 10 и 11 октября 2026 года на «Газпром Арене» в Санкт-Петербурге, сообщает агентство Say. Информацию подтвердили в пресс-службе площадки.
Билеты будут стоить от 9 тыс. до 160 тыс. ₽.
🔁 Читайте на Russian Business
@rb_ru
У российского бизнеса Nestle может смениться собственник ✍️
Все пять компаний Nestle в России предложили передать под временное управление. Авторы инициативы считают, что нынешние владельцы недостаточно активно развивают бизнес — и не планируют расширять производство.
В самой Nestle подчёркивают, что продолжают финансировать производство и операционную деятельность, а также выполняют все обязательства.
📌 Если иниц…
Российские стриминги обсуждают единые правила маркировки ИИ-музыки 💜
Первой отмечать нейротреки планирует Яндекс Музыка. В пресс-службе подтвердили: стриминг уже собирает у правообладателей данные об использовании ИИ в треках.
Как именно будет выглядеть маркировка, пока неизвестно.
«То, как информация будет отображаться в сервисе, зависит от многих факторов, в том числе от количества данных, которые мы получим от …
Теперь можно на 100% определить, что текст написан ИИ. Или нет? 👀
В начале августа Anthropic начал маркировать весь контент, созданный новыми моделями Claude. Водяной знак нельзя удалить даже при копировании текста и его редактировании.
➡️ Вместе с Кириллом Пшинником, сооснователем университета «Зерокодер», разобрались, как работает новая маркировка и зачем она вообще нужна.
@rb_ru
ЦБ готовится бороться с мисселингом на крипторынке — но эксперты сомневаются в эффективности мер 🪙
С 1 сентября ЦБ намерен контролировать, как лицензированные участники продают криптовалюту и предупреждают инвесторов о рисках. Регулятор будет следить, чтобы покупателям раскрывали особенности активов и не замалчивали возможные потери.
Однако полностью решить проблему мисселинга это не сможет, считают эксперты Russia…
Не продать бизнес за $50 млн — и построить империю 🍿
Netflix начала свой путь в 1998 году с отправки DVD по почте. Спустя два года основатели попытались продать бизнес за $50 млн — но сделка не состоялась.
После компания несколько раз меняла собственную модель:
🔵 отказалась от дисков ради стриминга,
🔵 начала снимать оригинальные сериалы,
🔵 запустила подписку с рекламой, хотя раньше выступала против неё.
🔁 Сегодня…
Стало известно, как изменятся тарифы на нейросети DeepSeek 🐋
С 16 августа стоимость ИИ-моделей для разработчиков будет зависеть от времени суток. В часы пик тарифы окажутся в два раза выше, чем в остальное время.
↗️ Например, миллион входных токенов модели V4 Flash в пиковые часы будет стоить $0,44. В остальное время цены будут снижены до $0,22.
До сих пор модели компании оставались одними из самых дешёвых на рынк…
Sunlight вновь выиграл суд у Cartier — спор между компаниями длится уже 5 лет 💎
Швейцарская компания, входящая в холдинг Richemont, требовала от Sunlight 25 млн ₽ за нарушение авторских прав. Поводом стала продажа украшений, похожих на культовый Cartier Love.
Сходство между украшениями заметно в отдельных деталях:
🔵Cartier Love — браслет украшен изображениями головок винтов и застёгивается с помощью винта и отвёрт…
👍103👏88🌚78🤣10❤8🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @rb_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 120 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
vc.ru @vcnews · 111,625 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Russian Business” (@rb_ru), 358,532 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rb_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.