Если честно, то мы не помним, чтобы не было так тихо, в плане рекламных кампаний, в сезон распродаж. 🥲 На всякий случай: 🍃 «11.11» — в 2009 году китайская компания AliBaba Group впервые объявила об акции «Всемирный день шопинга», с тех пор 11 ноября знаменует собой начало распродаж по всему миру; 🍃 «Черная пятница» — это период скидок и распродаж в последнюю неделю ноября, концепция придумана в 1960-х годах в США;…

Channel
UnderПяр
@underpyar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,427subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001220617437 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @underpyar |
| Description | Обратная сторона журналистики, пиара и маркетинга. Обратная связь — @underPRv1_bot Резервный контакт: @nameee01 🖤 Telegram х UnderПяр РКН: clck.ru/3FVRXS MAX: max.ru/underpyar |
| Created | 14 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/underpyar |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:18 | 22,427 | +13 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:55 | 22,414 | -3 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:01 | 22,417 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:51 | 22,422 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:39 | 22,424 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:51 | 22,425 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:59 | 22,428 | +6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:06 | 22,422 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:20 | 22,426 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 22,429 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 22,436 | +1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 22,435 | +3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:29 | 22,432 | +82 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:46 | 22,350 | +36 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 22,314 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:27 | 22,315 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:16 | 22,313 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:26 | 22,317 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 22,316 | -3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 22,319 | first reading |
Engagement
264 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.1%
- avg views ÷ 22,427 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,610
- 46 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.604%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 46
- of 264 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 264 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 166,171 |
| Reactions total | 1,004 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,410
- Videos
- ≈814
- Links
- ≈2,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 37m 32s
- Average length
- 1m 34s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,728 reactions across 248 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 2,371 | 35.2% | |
| ❤ | 1,504 | 22.4% | |
| 🌚 | 1,113 | 16.5% | |
| 🔥 | 499 | 7.42% | |
| ❤🔥 | 322 | 4.79% | |
| 👍 | 302 | 4.49% | |
| 😢 | 302 | 4.49% | |
| 💯 | 250 | 3.72% | |
| ⚡ | 65 | 0.966% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 261 of the 264 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,196 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 264 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 264 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @underpyar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 264 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.379%
- 1 of 264 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 1,880
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 1,950
- over 263 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGDwx49 | 1 | 25 September 2026 | 25 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 264 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 20 of 46 posts held from the last 30 days (43.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
кроме Медиалогии все остальные посылают агентства на три буквы => стабильные 2,5+ млн рублей в год достается Медиалогии (+спасибо за классную команду поддержки а не полный треш как у коллег)
❤11💯9
А что выбираем для аналитики?
- Медиалогия71%
- Brand Analytics22%
- СКАН-Интерфакс / YouScan (учитываем перверсии)7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤9🔥6😢4
Приколюхи у Pims! Ребята объединились с «Московским долголетием» и решили подружить зумеров с бабушками и дедушками. Сделали специальное меню напитков, карточки-переводчики с молодёжного сленга на язык старшего поколения и даже мерч. А если приходишь с бабушкой или дедушкой, получаешь скидку 30%. Идея, кстати, классная. Pims таким образом пытается выйти на старшую аудиторию, до которой этим вашим диджитолом особо …
🔥10🌚9😁4❤3😢1
😄 Вам пригодится эта картинка для важных переговоров
😁26❤7
Дуров, бл9ть, верни стену! В Telegram тестируют новую функцию — единую ленту новостей. В бета-версии приложения появился раздел News, где можно будет смотреть публикации из всех своих каналов в одном месте. Но нам интереснее другая вкладка — For You. Там ТГ будет рекомендовать посты в том числе из каналов, на которые пользователь не подписан. По сути, речь о полноценной алгоритмической ленте. И если её запустят, ры…
🔥16❤8👍4
Правило пиарщика № 99: хотите продвигаться — вкладывайтесь в фэнси-контент. Помните, мы рассказывали про «Логику молока» и их конкурс креативных идей? Так вот, ребята продолжают. На этот раз они затащили к себе Антона Шастуна и Диму Журавлёва, которые сняли целый выпуск «Креативщиков» прямо для официального канала компании. Причём парни особо не скрывали, что им заплатили. Выставили перед собой весь молочный ассор…
🌚11😢8❤6🔥1
Уважаемый Сергей Геннадьевич на НРФ наградил Сбер и SELA за социально-ответственную рекламу. Реклама оказалась и правда классной! 🔸UnderПяр есть и в MAX
❤9🔥2❤🔥1
«Фейки вас не надуют — надуем мы» Увидели тут прекрасную рекламу медиахолдинга Rambler&Co со слоганом «Фейки вас не надуют!». Собрали наши любимые кейсы. ➡️ «Газета.Ru» и миллионы долларов для голливудских звёзд (2025) Издание рассказало, что USAID заплатило Анджелине Джоли $20 млн, Орландо Блуму $8 млн, а Бену Стиллеру $4 млн за поездки на Украину. Сослались на американское E! News. Правда, само E! News ничего …
😁16💯6❤5🌚3❤🔥2
Доехали на НРФ. Плотненько тут! 🔸UnderПяр есть и в MAX
❤4
RuStore продолжает расти. Ну а как иначе то? По данным Mediascope, месячная аудитория российского магазина приложений выросла за год на 17% и достигла 73 млн человек. Для сравнения: у Google Play за это же время аудитория сократилась на 3,1%, до 83,6 млн. У Samsung Galaxy Store падение вообще на 20,2%, у Huawei AppGallery — на 10,5%. То есть RuStore уже практически догнал Google Play по месячной аудитории. И вот ту…
👍6😢6❤1🔥1
За рекламу в Telegram с 2027 года штрафовать не будут. По крайней мере, об этом пишет проект «Пост-» со ссылкой на источники в правительстве. По информации издания, власти решили продлить переходный период, который ранее ФАС обозначила до конца 2026 года. Окончательного решения о запрете рекламы до сих пор нет, а сторонников жёстких мер в отношении Telegram, судя по всему, поубавилось. Одна из причин — проблемы с M…
🌚11❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 264 posts we hold for @underpyar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@underpyar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 18 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А что выбираем для аналитики?
- Медиалогия71%
- Brand Analytics22%
- СКАН-Интерфакс / YouScan (учитываем перверсии)7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Дорогие, а что с рынком нашего любимого пяра, собственно?
- Штормит, ой как штормит!24%
- А что случилось? Что за паника?68%
- Так все же очень хорошо с ним!8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 264 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@mediastanciacom · 118,8138 postsНОВОСТИ 📰
@russica2 · 661,3438 postsПиши Касука
@pishi_kasuka · 26,2713 postsЮлия Кожова (Преображенская)
@YuliyaKozhova · 402 postsDENIS-ai-marketing-biz-🇺🇿🇷🇺🇦🇪🇺🇸 🇵🇼🇧🇷🇰🇬🇦🇺🇬🇧
@denismarketingai · 3332 postsМониторинг BY
@MonitoringBY · 8,4711 postСодержанка в законе
@Niassa_blog · 3231 postPRотоколы сознания
@PRotokolysoznania · 721 postСпроси у Коновой
@askkonova · 1621 postТелеграмма от Бакиева
@bakiev_tg · 3801 postСоцкая / про маркетинг и бухучёт
@buh_smm · 111 postХуже Федосеева
@huzhegebbelsa · 15,3651 postКлуб жертв когнитивных войн🤔
@interestingviews · 81 postАвтопиарошная
@kottler_auto · 1311 postИлья Левинсон, загуглите
@levinday · 1481 postТёма Логинов | шеф КОМРЕДЫ
@loginovkomreda · 1,0531 postМедиавойны
@mediavoyni · 36,3491 postКруассаны в стаканы
@obzhorka_salimova · 981 post#prmsk
@prmsk_channel · 3,0741 postРоман Рябцев (Roman Ryabtsev)/JoyHeart
@romanryabtsev · 3,4631 postГорчица
@russianmust · 2,5821 postНЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 417,7101 postСережа
@samsonov_serge · 1581 postБанковский Пул
@somethg · 4,3401 postТелеграмщик
@ttelegramshik · 4061 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@bponline · 111,5103 postsХуже Федосеева
@huzhegebbelsa · 15,3652 postsBrand Analytics – цифры и тренды
@BrandAnalytics · 6,8911 postSimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 176,5791 postНЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 503,4921 postИнтериум // Группа Р.И.М. – ИНТЕРИУМ
@interiumoverheard · 8591 postХод Конева
@knightsmove · 41,1261 postЛобушкин
@lobushkin · 101,1531 postЛука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 429,0551 postЛюбаЕСТ
@lyubaest · 16,7781 postолдскульный маркетинг
@marketingold · 122,9841 postNewsroom: PR и коммуникации
@newsroom_company · 1,8771 postОсторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,1011 postПиши Касука
@pishi_kasuka · 26,2711 postБудни пиарщика | Канал о региональной рекламе
@prbudni21 · 4,1271 postНОВОСТИ 📰
@russica2 · 661,3431 postкабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,5401 postАнтиглянец
@sncmag · 299,5761 postГероиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 102,5341 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 56 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@russica2 · 661,3439 postsreal cultras
@real_cultras · 24,1606 postsBrand Analytics – цифры и тренды
@BrandAnalytics · 6,8915 postsХуже Федосеева
@huzhegebbelsa · 15,3655 postsПиши Касука
@pishi_kasuka · 26,2715 postsЮрий Баранчик
@barantchik · 90,6003 posts⚠️ Общественный уполномоченный по защите семьи (ОУЗС)
@ouzs_ru · 77,0733 postsРИА КАТЮША
@riakatysha · 82,5113 postsНЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 417,7103 postsЖурналистика
@dddjournalism · 131,2392 postsГлаз Блога
@glasBloga · 2752 postsНебрехня
@nebrexnya · 118,2792 postsПАНКИН
@Pankin_Ivan · 23,5622 posts#prmsk
@prmsk_channel · 3,0742 postsЦенности.РФ
@tsennostirf · 8,4572 postsВАРИАНТ
@variantnews · 134,0952 postsДруид
@wisedruidd · 57,9562 postsАрсен Алексанян
@arsenblog · 4991 postЧто там в Челябинске?
@fromche · 611 postЧайная комната
@matveytszen · 1,6881 postНа распутье.ру
@narasputyeru · 8,3061 postСамойлов
@oversized_shirts · 11,7511 post🇷🇺Движение Сорок Сороков Z
@sorok40russia · 44,9881 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@prbezposhady · 151,2135 postsХуже Федосеева
@huzhegebbelsa · 15,3654 postsХод Конева
@knightsmove · 41,1263 postsЛобушкин
@lobushkin · 101,1533 postsРаньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,4362 postsМонстарс
@monstars_moscow · 1,4642 postsНадо было вчера
@nadobulovchera · 27,8142 postsNewsroom: PR и коммуникации
@newsroom_company · 1,8772 postsОтЪехавшая
@ohuevshayapresssluzhba · 3,4562 posts#prmsk
@prmsk_channel · 3,0742 postsRassvet.events: события в пиаре и маркетинге
@Rassvet_events · 1,6852 postsАнтиглянец
@sncmag · 299,5762 postsСИГНАЛ
@ssigny · 427,8752 postsBreaking Trends
@breakingtrends · 32,7991 postЕсть контакт?
@estcontact · 29,4261 postHR4PR
@hr4pr · 16,2011 postЛицо и цветочки
@mark_leshkevich · 2,5591 postPR for SPEAKERS
@PR_for_SPEAKERS · 3,9071 postPR_Russia
@PR_RussiaFB · 12,3001 postКиберЯР
@prbyyar · 20,3471 postНедвижимый пиарщик
@prmebaby · 19,1481 postРамзай
@ramzayiegokomanda · 150,9221 postТелекоммуналка
@telecommunal · 43,8581 postДруид
@wisedruidd · 57,9561 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hr4pr · 16,201#1
@lider · 175,531#2
@prhubmoscow · 9,941#3
@prforlove · 6,549#4
@prpioner · 6,457#5
@estcontact · 29,426#6
@prbudni21 · 4,127#7
@adindex · 31,282#8
@prmsk_channel · 3,074#9
@tatlersheroine · 102,534#10
@radio_tishina · 2,531#11
@prexplore · 8,916#12
@chernousovnotes · 619#13
@temalebedev · 968,108#14
@zabelincom8 · 514#15
@zebrapro · 2,221#16
@protdel · 2,890#17
@pstmarketing · 64,038#18
@PR_Us · 3,401#19
@girlsandpr · 6,147#20
@openspace_notes · 2,309#21
@mokhova_pr · 3,623#22
@prbezposhady · 151,213#23
@bponline · 111,510#24
@sale_caviar · 192,540#25
@sncmag · 299,576#26
@prrussia · 6,368#27
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436#28
@smmrus · 124,951#29
@creative · 133,442#30
@PR_RussiaFB · 12,300#31
@sostav · 56,425#32
@prbyyar · 20,347#33
@bazabazon · 1,557,057#34
@marketingold · 122,984#35
@huzhegebbelsa · 15,365#36
@bloodysx · 1,172,884#37
@ejdailyru · 664,380#38
@lobushkin · 101,153#39
@rbc_news · 913,555#40
@moscowmap · 2,622,185#41
@aitadigital · 4,775#42
@lobushkinflash · 73,666#43
@banksta · 439,838#44
@stasyboooo · 15,333#45
@yourtypicalclient · 47,548#46
@meduzalive · 1,116,844#47
@boomers_TV · 156,794#48
@byprperfect · 4,380#49
@breakingtrends · 32,799#50
@kontext_channel · 865,039#51
@aslanovPR · 11,616#52
@bdsmpr · 2,662#53
@minaevlife · 317,691#54
@spletni_tg · 186,947#55
@AdYummy · 9,382#56
@kommersant · 295,286#57
@theblueprintcareer · 143,936#58
@nadobulovchera · 27,814#59
@luka_ebkov · 429,055#60
@ptichkamaman · 2,172#61
@znaete · 5,431#62
@vcnews · 112,144#63
@imnotbozhena · 503,492#64
@Godketing · 111,753#65
@sosindex · 6,632#66
@costperlead · 108,250#67
@notypicmarketing · 707,978#68
@korolevsnotes · 6,409#69
@strelets_molodec · 348,852#70
@govoritmip · 3,467#71
@collegi · 134,121#72
@mosnow · 431,267#73
@balticweekend · 3,443#74
@dimsmirnov175 · 331,028#75
@toxic_digital · 5,529#76
@n_e_w_media · 17,078#77
@morejobs · 84,549#78
@mediavoyni · 36,349#79
@planerka_org · 48,437#80
@bankrollo · 462,111#81
@GuerrillaMarketing · 105,260#82
@setters · 82,535#83
@Pressfeed_queries · 8,045#84
@vedomosti · 86,957#85
@neposlednielyudi · 57,235#86
@prbullshit · 1,531#87
@semsotslov · 1,747#88
@svintrovert · 83,318#89
@forbesrussia · 235,497#90
@mash · 3,140,033#91
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,101#92
@tass_agency · 569,137#93
@vacanciesbest · 162,821#94
@mnews_ru · 194,474#95
@ostorozhno_moskva · 396,461#96
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mediatusovka · 18,784
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 October 2026
@estcontact · 29,426
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@prbyyar · 20,347
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
@pstmarketing · 64,038
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
@forumchanka_on_air · 23,914
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
@prbezposhady · 151,213
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@adindex · 31,282
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
@lobushkin · 101,153
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@breakingtrends · 32,799
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 September 2026
@nadobulovchera · 27,814
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
@mediavoyni · 36,349
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
@pishi_kasuka · 26,271
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
@protechietich · 20,851
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
@dddjournalism · 131,239
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@yourtypicalclient · 47,548
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
@creative · 133,442
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@sostav · 56,425
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
@mediastanciacom · 118,813
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
@wowadvertise · 28,218
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
@bponline · 111,510
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
@Digitalmrktng · 20,055
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
@morejobs · 84,549
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
@smmrus · 124,951
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@lobushkinflash · 73,666
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UnderПяр” (@underpyar), 22,427 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/underpyar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.