Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Beget Official

@beget_official

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,893subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001789534748
TypeChannel
Username@beget_official
DescriptionЭто официальный канал облачного провайдера Beget. Это официальный чат с сотрудниками и пользователями Бегет - https://t.me/beget_chat Это правила - beget.com/s/8t9Lr Читайте новости, обсуждайте новости, наслаждайтесь :)
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/beget_official

Growth

9,8939,9019,8976 August 2026 — 9,897 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,897 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,901 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,893 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,892–9,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:289,893-8
9 Aug 2026, 07:159,901+4
6 Aug 2026, 04:229,897no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:189,897first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.6%
avg views ÷ 9,893 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,900
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held14 (15 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total82,600
Reactions total1,622
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
424
Videos
9
Links
239

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,622 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬54933.8%
😢30618.9%
👍21213.1%
1448.88%
🔥975.98%
👎955.86%
custom 5471920993758892770865.30%
😱734.50%
😁311.91%
🎉110.678%
👏110.678%
🥰30.185%
🤔20.123%
🤩20.123%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,622reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beget_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,850 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В маркетплейсе готовых решений для VPS теперь доступна NocoDB – no-code платформа с открытым исходным кодом, которая позволяет работать с базами данных через удобный интерфейс без программирования. С помощью NocoDB вы можете: 🔷 создавать различные представления данных – Kanban-доски, формы обратной связи, галереи, списки, календари и диаграммы Ганта; 🔷 работать над данными в команде и управлять доступом к ним – на

👏115👍4🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈2,690 views14 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

6👎4👍3🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,470 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Бывают ситуации, когда базовых возможностей Kubernetes уже недостаточно – например, нужно подключить мониторинг, организовать хранение данных, добавить сетевые плагины и управление сертификатами. Для этих и других задач могут пригодиться аддоны – готовые компоненты, которые избавляют от ручной настройки сервисов, помогая ускорить развертывание и сопровождение кластера. Уже сейчас вы можете подключить K8s у нас и ис

12👎2🔥1🤬1

6 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,360 views44 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В маркетплейсе готовых решений для VPS теперь доступен Hermes Agent – открытый автономный AI-агент, который работает на сервере, выполняет задачи в терминале, учится на результатах своей работы и становится эффективнее с каждым запуском. В отличие от плагинов для IDE, это полноценная система с собственным терминалом, файловой системой, доступом в интернет и механизмом памяти. Hermes Agent может: 🔶 выполнять код и

20🔥16👍4👎3😁1

4 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈4,720 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Связка из двух уязвимостей (CVE-2026-63030 / CVE-2026-60137) позволяет злоумышленнику без авторизации выполнить произвольный код на сайте, создать пользователя с правами администратора и загрузить веб-шелл. Плагины и особая конфигурация для эксплуатации не нужны – уязвима установка WordPress из коробки. Затронутые версии: - полная цепочка RCE: WordPress 6.9.0–6.9.4 и 7.0.0–7.0.1 - только SQL-инъекция: WordPress 6.8

19👍9😁5🔥3👎1

4 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈4,650 views122 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Латвийская локация окончательно отключена. Ресурсы, размещенные в данной локации, удалены из панели управления. Доступ к ним более невозможен. К сожалению, мы не имеем возможности повлиять на это решение или продлить срок работы площадки. Благодарим за понимание.

😢8519custom 547192099375889277014🎉1👎1🤔1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC≈8,470 views651 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Обновление по латвийской локации Мы получили новую информацию от партнёра: сегодня, 28 июля, в 14:30 по московскому времени латвийская локация будет полностью отключена. После отключения размещённые в ней серверы и данные станут недоступны. После отключения локации связанные с ней IP-адреса будут удалены из панели управления. Мы будем публиковать ключевые обновления по мере появления новой информации.

🤬516😢51custom 547192099375889277041👍13😁13😱75👎3

25 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC≈8,680 views67 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Миграция проекта из Латвии в Санкт-Петербург В связи с приостановкой работы латвийской площадки мы получаем множество вопросов о переносе проектов. Рекомендуем в качестве целевой площадки локацию в Санкт-Петербурге: она работает в штатном режиме, обеспечивает высокую стабильность и предоставляет полный набор ресурсов, необходимых для размещения и обслуживания ваших сервисов. Доступность внешних ресурсов Из локации

👍3619😁6👎4😢2

25 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC≈7,360 views107 reactions7 Starsread 13 August 2026

FAQ по текущей ситуации На фоне введённых ограничений мы получаем много вопросов о работе отдельных сервисов, локаций и наших дальнейших планах. Собрали ответы на основные из них в одном месте. Будем обновлять этот FAQ по мере появления новой информации. Продолжат ли работать сервисы и инфраструктура в России? Какие есть риски? Российская инфраструктура продолжает работать в штатном режиме. Текущая ситуация на её р

👍7222🤬7👎3🔥3

24 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC≈10,900 views219 reactionsread 13 August 2026

О ситуации с нашей инфраструктурой в Латвии Наш латвийский партнёр и оператор дата-центра уведомил нас о приостановке предоставления услуг до момента, когда будут определены возможные условия дальнейшего взаимодействия с Beget в связи с введёнными ограничениями. В результате инфраструктура Beget, размещённая на площадке в Латвии приостанавливает работу в самое ближайшее время. Мы уже работаем с партнёрами и юридич

😢128👎31🤬20😱11👍109😁5🥰3

24 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC≈7,130 views198 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Наша компания была включена в санкционный список Европейского союза. На текущий момент мы не ожидаем, что это решение окажет влияние на работу наших сервисов и инфраструктуры. Все услуги продолжают предоставляться в штатном режиме. Мы внимательно анализируем ситуацию и возможные последствия. Если появятся изменения, которые могут повлиять на наших пользователей или работу сервисов, мы оперативно сообщим об этом по

😱55🔥51custom 547192099375889277031😢29👍21🎉92

20 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈6,850 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Чтобы увеличить скорость загрузки сайта, может быть полезно подключить CDN. Это распределенная сеть серверов, которая хранит копии вашего контента и доставляет их пользователям из ближайшей точки, что положительно влияет на скорость загрузки и улучшает ранжирование сайтов в поисковиках. Серверы CDN Beget расположены в 207+ дата-центрах на 5 континентах, обеспечивая быструю загрузку сайтов в России и по всему миру.

👍19🔥41

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @beget_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,180 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Beget Official” (@beget_official), 9,893 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beget_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.