Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

The Инновации

@TheInnovations

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,920subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001320294597
TypeChannel
Username@TheInnovations
Created3 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheInnovations

Growth

3,9203,9653,942.56 August 2026 — 3,965 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,961 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,943 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,920 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,913–3,972 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:123,920-23
9 Aug 2026, 14:163,943-18
6 Aug 2026, 23:103,961-4
6 Aug 2026, 15:223,965first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.40%
avg views ÷ 3,920 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.2
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held9 (24 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total848
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2875.7%
821.6%
💯12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прием заявок на GIA продлен У участников GenerationS Innovation Award появилось больше времени, чтобы присоединиться к премии. Прием заявок продлен до 18 сентября 📢 GIA объединяет копорации, МТК, а также ВУЗы и технопарки России. Премия помогает представить проекты профессиональному сообществу, повысить их узнаваемость, найти новых партнеров и получить экспертную оценку. Если вы еще не успели подать заявку, сейч

🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC74 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что происходит на мировом рынке финтеха Несмотря на более осторожный подход инвесторов, финтех остается одним из самых привлекательных направлений для вложений. Компании привлекают более крупные раунды, а капитал все чаще концентрируется в проектах, способных стать частью базовой финансовой инфраструктуры. В фокусе — решения, которые помогают банкам, страховым компаниям и бизнесу автоматизировать процессы, работать

🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC94 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ядерный стартап Valar Atomics может привлечь инвестиции при оценке $6 млрд По данным TechCrunch, американский стартап Valar Atomics ведет переговоры о новом раунде финансирования. Если сделка состоится, оценка компании может достичь $6 млрд — это уровень, который обычно характерен для зрелых технологических компаний, а не для стартапов. Valar Atomics разрабатывает компактные модульные реакторы, рассчитанные на сери

🔥5

31 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

OpenAI представила первый собственный AI-чип. В чем его особенность? Разработка собственного AI-чипа стала для OpenAI частью долгосрочной стратегии развития вычислительной инфраструктуры. По данным TechCrunch, первый чип компании Jalapeño создается совместно с Broadcom. При этом OpenAI не стремится заменить универсальные графические процессоры: новый чип предназначен прежде всего для инференса — выполнения запросов

2🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Какие проекты будут отмечены на GenerationS Innovation Award 2026 GenerationS Innovation Award 2026 объединяет девять номинаций, которые охватывают всю цепочку развития инноваций — от университетских стартапов и технологических компаний до крупных корпораций, инновационной инфраструктуры и отраслевых проектов. В этом году принять участие могут корпоративные команды, инноваторы, стартапы, малые технологические компа

🔥4

29 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC98 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Большая охота за талантами: почему Big Tech начали бороться за ключевых специалистов Конкуренция между технологическими компаниями все чаще выходит за пределы продуктов и разработок. Сегодня одним из самых ценных активов становятся специалисты, которые создают новые технологии. По данным TechCrunch, один из руководителей команды Apple Vision Pro — Руомин Панг, отвечавший за развитие AI-моделей в Apple, покидает ком

🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC96 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

4 ошибки, которые совершают компании при выходе на китайский рынок Выход на китайский рынок требует не только сильной технологии, но и понимания того, как устроена одна из крупнейших инновационных экосистем мира. На практике многие компании сталкиваются с одними и теми же сложностями. Чаще всего это: ⚙️Недостаточное понимание специфики рынка. Китай — это разные регионы, отрасли и модели ведения бизнеса. Подход, ко

🔥32

27 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC109 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Производство будущего: почему компании ускоряют технологическую модернизацию Производственная отрасль входит в новый этап технологической трансформации. Согласно исследованию PwC, к 2030 году уровень автоматизации производственных и операционных процессов вырастет почти в 2,8 раза, а технологическая оснащенность предприятий — в 2,6 раза. Однако главный вывод исследования заключается не в темпах внедрения технологий

🔥51💯1

24 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC107 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Технологические ограничения создают новый рынок AI-компаний в Азии Рынок искусственного интеллекта все сильнее зависит не только от технологий, но и от геополитики. После того как Anthropic ограничила доступ к своим передовым моделям для ряда стран Азии из-за экспортных ограничений США, региональные разработчики начали активно создавать собственные решения. Одним из таких примеров стал стартап Mythos AI, который р

🔥43

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @TheInnovations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 716,692 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Инновации” (@TheInnovations), 3,920 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheInnovations.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.