Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 99 days, net +64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,611–6,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 00:06
6,685
+1
8 Nov 2026, 10:37
6,684
-1
5 Nov 2026, 01:46
6,685
+12
2 Nov 2026, 01:58
6,673
-1
30 Oct 2026, 04:26
6,674
+2
27 Oct 2026, 08:50
6,672
+2
24 Oct 2026, 04:20
6,670
-1
21 Oct 2026, 12:49
6,671
+5
17 Oct 2026, 23:40
6,666
-3
14 Oct 2026, 19:49
6,669
+3
11 Oct 2026, 01:01
6,666
+7
5 Oct 2026, 03:55
6,659
-2
26 Sept 2026, 07:21
6,661
-1
17 Sept 2026, 03:58
6,662
+2
12 Sept 2026, 22:00
6,660
-4
9 Sept 2026, 01:59
6,664
+13
4 Sept 2026, 01:17
6,651
+18
31 Aug 2026, 10:02
6,633
+4
27 Aug 2026, 23:47
6,629
+4
20 Aug 2026, 16:05
6,625
first reading
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 6,685 subscribers
Avg views / post
688
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.449%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
73 (23 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
22,698
Reactions total
102
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 03:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,690
Videos
≈532
Links
≈7,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
238 reactions across 67 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
136
57.1%
🔥
54
22.7%
👍
26
10.9%
😁
8
3.36%
🌚
5
2.10%
👏
3
1.26%
😨
2
0.84%
😱
2
0.84%
🤣
2
0.84%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Почти половина новых игр в Steam создается с помощью AI: рынок геймдева захлестнули дешевые проекты и клоны популярных игр, но некоторые платформы чистят каталоги и дают пользователям фильтры от AI-мусора
Геймдев-разработчики все чаще используют AI для создания графики, музыки, диалогов и программного кода. Это позволяет выпускать игры значительно быстрее, но одновременно приводит к росту числа однотипных и низкокач…
AI-агенты оказались слишком дорогими даже для бигтехов — компании ищут способы сократить расходы в 10 раз
Крупнейшие технологические компании активно продвигают AI-агентов как следующий этап развития AI. Однако по мере появления первых продуктов выясняется, что их массовое распространение сдерживает высокая стоимость вычислений
💰 AI-агенты — пока привилегия платных подписчиков
OpenAI предоставляет доступ к своему а…
Премии потом, переработки сейчас: как компании используют обещания будущих успехов для мотивации сотрудников
Российские компании все чаще используют обещания будущих успехов, чтобы мотивировать сотрудников работать больше за прежние деньги. Руководители рассказывают о крупных контрактах, скором росте бизнеса и победе над конкурентами, обещая взамен премии, повышение зарплат и карьерное продвижение. Однако спустя нес…
Отчет Stanford HAI: общество почти не участвует в определении будущего AI, риски AI из научной фантастики становятся реальными, AI стал полноценным участником войн (часть 2)
🔹 Военное применение AI перешло от экспериментов к реальному участию в вооруженных конфликтах
AI уже используют в действующих конфликтах для разведки, анализа информации, составления списков потенциальных целей, поддержки решений военных команди…
Отчет Stanford HAI: масштабирование AI замедляется, новый этап развития AI связан с ростом качества алгоритмов и данных, экономическая отдача от AI пока не доказана (часть 1)
Проект AI100 при Стэнфордском институте человекоцентричного AI (Stanford HAI) представил отчет AI Goes Mainstream 2026 о развитии AI и его влиянии на экономику и общество за последние пять лет. Ключевые выводы исследователей: масштабирование мо…
От FOMUT к Ambient anxiety tax: как AI-агенты меняют психологическую нагрузку на человека
Рост автономности AI-агентов и появление многоагентных систем — вместо ожидаемого снижения ментальной нагрузки на людей — дают им новые поводы для тревоги. Достаточно ли пользователь загрузил их работой, что происходит в нескольких задачах одновременно и успевает ли человек понять все, что они сделали. У этих переживаний появля…
AI-агентов начали обучать на рабочих переписках и решениях закрывшихся стартапов
AI-лаборатории используют историю рабочих процессов как основу для виртуальных сред, в которых AI-агенты учатся решать профессиональные задачи. Благодаря этому у закрывающихся стартапов появляется новый способ заработать, а у разработчиков AI-моделей — рынок данных
🧩 Корпоративные переписки — это тренажеры для AI-агентов
Компания Surge…
AI позволяет предпринимателям создавать бизнес с миллионной выручкой без сотрудников
AI меняет экономику малого бизнеса в США. Предприниматели все реже нанимают сотрудников и используют нейросети для выполнения задач, которые раньше приходилось распределять между несколькими специалистами. AI помогает вести бухгалтерию, обслуживать клиентов, создавать рекламу, разрабатывать дизайн и управлять продажами. В результате…
🫥 Что нового у российских экосистем
✅ Сбер
Добавил «Литрес Подписку» в СберПрайм, предоставив подписчикам доступ к электронным и аудиокнигам без ограничений по количеству произведений, скидку до 30% на покупку книг в Литрес и кешбэк 20% в «Читай-городе»
Предоставил всем пользователям мобильного приложения СберБизнес доступ к режиму «Бизнес-помощник» на базе ГигаЧата с 176 AI-агентами
Открыл разработчикам бесплатны…
🥙 Золотое яблоко создало AI-сервис подбора парфюма по эмоциям, LG предложит заказывать еду через телевизор — и другие новости e-commerce и foodtech
🧴 Золотое яблоко запустило в своем приложении AI-сервис для подбора парфюма по желаемым эмоциям
Сервис «Найди тот самый аромат» позволяет подобрать парфюм с учетом получателя, повода, желаемых ощущений и ассоциаций, заметности шлейфа и бюджета. Он предлагает ароматы и по…
Западные компании выбирают китайские нейросети, а стартапы переделывают их, чтобы убрать цензуру
Китайские AI-модели с открытыми весами стремительно набирают популярность за пределами КНР благодаря высокой производительности, низкой стоимости и возможностям настройки. Однако западные компании опасаются использовать их из-за встроенной цензуры, политической предвзятости и потенциальных угроз кибербезопасности. Этот с…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @sbmarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Финтехно @fintexno · 29,755 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
42 секунды @ftsec · 19,385 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
ТВОЙ ПРАЙМ @sber_spasibo · 84,969 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 October 2026
СберМаркетинг @sbermarketing · 308,102 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
СберПремьер @sberpremiernew · 106,202 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
СберМобайл @sbermobile_official · 23,623 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
ВТБ для бизнеса @vtb_smb · 114,473 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Сбер @sberbank · 726,803 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Frank Media @frank_media · 32,160 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Все о блокчейн/мозге/space/WEB 3.0 в России и мире @blockchainRF · 20,455 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 September 2026
РБК Тренды @rbc_trends · 31,483 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
билайн @beeline · 21,662 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 September 2026
Russian Business @rb_ru · 368,690 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
Рука рынка @market_hand · 30,591 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Экспертосфера @expertosphere · 30,120 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 8 September 2026
Business Incognita @businessincognita · 23,828 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
Салют, это SberDevices @sber_devices · 22,094 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Карьера в Сбере! @careersber · 134,027 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
9 утра | Новости и анонсы @v9utra · 73,189 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
СберСтартап @sberstartup · 40,858 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 29 August 2026
СберУниверситет @sber_university · 24,348 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
Нетмонет @netmonet_co · 193,643 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
Data Insight . Цифры E-commerce @DataInsight · 20,312 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“News & Trends by Sber” (@sbmarketing), 6,685 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbmarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.