Перечитал разбор Simon Taylor от октября прошлого года про запуск Agentic Commerce Protocol: OpenAI и Stripe выкатили открытый протокол, чтобы AI-агент собирал чекаут прямо из SKU мерчанта. Стек менять не надо, работает с любым PSP. Etsy на запуске сделал +16% к акции за день. Тейлор обещал конверсию из ChatGPT в 2–6 раз выше, чем из Google, и рисовал арифметику «мерчант на $100 млн может стать $600 млн». Главная ста…

Channel
Bykov Digital ❇️
@bykovdigital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,346subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001376004609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bykovdigital |
| Created | 3 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bykovdigital |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 3,346 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 3,347 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 3,341 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 3,341 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.5%
- avg views ÷ 3,346 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 988
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.193%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (25 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,859 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 59.0% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 30.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bykovdigital. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Matej Lancaric расписал, как он аудирует UA-аккаунты, на живом кейсе: $1,79 млн спенда, 10 кампаний, 19 гео, blended ROAS здоровый, недельные синки спокойные. За четыре часа в CSV-выгрузке нашлось: 5 кампаний бидили друг против друга за одну аудиторию в Штатах, 9 лучших гео делили 19,8% бюджета, пока одно среднее забирало 63% и продолжало расти, $55 838 ушло на тесты с CPA в 2–5× выше базового, а D7-мультипликатор съ…
🔥2
Nike не спонсор ЧМ, но его фильм собрал 66 млн просмотров за неделю. У официального adidas — партнёра FIFA с 1970-го — меньше 7 млн за месяц. Зато спонсором Nike считают 32% американцев, adidas — 40%. Восемь пунктов разницы за 56 лет контракта. Самая неудобная цифра там другая: при $10B+ рекламных денег вокруг турнира меньше 1% разговоров о ЧМ в Штатах упоминают хоть какой-то бренд. Просмотры и спонсорская ассоциаци…
Apple разослала рекламодателям обновление Advertising Terms of Service — вступает в силу 28 июля 2026. Главное сидит в пункте 6(a): раньше там было «реклама на программных приложениях или устройствах Apple», теперь — «устройства, операционные системы, ПО, веб-приложения или другие платформы». Слово «Apple» из формулировки про место показа исчезло. Заметил Эрик Сойферт (Mobile Dev Memo), первоисточник — PPC Land. Сей…
Если вы думаете что в хайповых стартапах работают супер гении обмазанные ии - то нет. Точнее как - ии обмазались, подумать забыли. Там тоже палят бабки бездумно. То, что я не элиджибал под этот офер по причине того что я платил уже за notion - это ладно. Но у меня в линке и локация указана, в которой они давно не работают.
👍1
Это как adidas vs Nike. Garmin купил TrainingPeaks и TrainHeroic — железячная компания докупила себе подписочный софтовый слой. Продавец Peaksware, 120 сотрудников переходят в Garmin, суммы не раскрыты. В релизе это называется «democratize coaching», но экономика проще: цикл замены часов ограничивает рост, а подписка и маркетплейс тренеров дают recurring revenue поверх железа. Забавно, что Garmin хоронят уже лет де…
У NYT игры оказались одним из лучших драйверов удержания во всём подписочном бандле — говорит head of games Jonathan Knight на Web Summit. Wordle купили в 2022, дальше пошли свои: Pips на домино-логике, Crossplay — первая игра на двоих. Теперь ставка на социальность, вплоть до живых кроссворд-турниров. Шоу по Wordle на NBC с Savannah Guthrie тоже будет, но Knight прямо говорит: не приоритет. Time, Vulture и BuzzFeed…
Никогда такого не было и вот опять 2 The secret Trump administration battle to fight Chinese AI Axios, Maria Curi, 20 июля 2026 Суть. Администрация Трампа подаёт сигналы, что может запретить передовые китайские AI-модели — шаг, который де-факто закрепил бы доминирование OpenAI и Anthropic. Триггер — запуск Kimi K3: американские компании всё активнее берут китайский open-source, потому что он дешевле и почти не усту…
Никогда такого не было и вот опять. Все хоронят банковские отделения уже лет десять, а крупные банки в Штатах (JPMorgan, BofA, Wells Fargo, PNC) три года подряд открывают по 1000+ новых в год. Curinos с Adrenaline посчитали почему: счёт, открытый в отделении, через год держит выше баланс и закрывается на 25% реже, чем открытый через digital. JPM и BofA к 2027 будут стоять во всех топ-50 рынках Штатов. Формат при это…
❤1
Испания взяла ЧМ, но выиграл adidas - обе команды финала играли в трех полосках. На роде Nike. adidas одевает 14 из 48 сборных турнира и берёт чемпионство в 4 из 6 последних ЧМ. Nike действует наоборот, точечно и дорого: перекупил Германию с 2027 года — после 72 лет с adidas, за ~€100 млн в год, вдвое выше прежней ставки. С учетом всех последних промахов Nike - интересный заход, ванугю эффектов будет не особо много.…
👍4❤1
Duolingo побил квартал по всем метрикам и поднял годовой гайденс по прибыли — а акцию всё равно слили, −77% за год. Единственная трещина в отчёте — MAU: 138 млн против ожидаемых 143, DAU при этом в норме. За такое не наказывают на три четверти капитализации. Наказывают за другое: рынок перестал верить в moat. Персональный репетитор теперь собирается одним промптом в ChatGPT или Gemini, и лидерство в категории «струк…
❤4👍1🔥1
🚗 Кейс: за 1,5 месяца вывели сайт по продаже автомобильных двигателей в ТОП по Москве 👤 Клиент: Компания, специализирующаяся на продаже автомобильных двигателей. 📍 Регион продвижения: Москва 🗓 Старт работ: 29.05.2026 ⚙️ В работу взяли: 540 поисковых запросов. Показатели проекта на старте: • ТОП-3 — 2% запросов • ТОП-5 — 6% запросов • ТОП-10 — 26% запросов 📈 Проект стартовал практически с нуля — большая часть зап…
❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @bykovdigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 354,027 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bykov Digital ❇️” (@bykovdigital), 3,346 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bykovdigital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.