Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +181. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 439,510–441,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 22:42
440,785
+1,001
11 Aug 2026, 22:55
439,784
-778
10 Aug 2026, 23:44
440,562
-475
9 Aug 2026, 22:23
441,037
-572
8 Aug 2026, 20:06
441,609
+451
7 Aug 2026, 23:06
441,158
+554
7 Aug 2026, 12:15
440,604
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 440,785 subscribers
Avg views / post
52,200
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.455%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
22 (28 April 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
365,500
Reactions total
1,664
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
235
Videos
96
Links
162
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 26s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,303 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,341
28.2%
👍
1,604
19.3%
🔥
1,151
13.9%
🎉
994
12.0%
🤯
501
6.03%
😱
470
5.66%
⚡
445
5.36%
🤩
248
2.99%
🤔
217
2.61%
❤🔥
105
1.26%
🍓
95
1.14%
🍾
61
0.735%
😎
33
0.397%
🦄
21
0.253%
💘
14
0.169%
🌚
3
0.036%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
4.55%
1 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
132,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
63,000
over 21 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHUH8uF
1
25 June 2026
25 June 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
В тревел-тех дорога заказана только айтишникам? А вот и нет.
Посмотрите интервью с Анной Очеретько, директором по развитию бизнеса Яндекс Путешествий. Она рассказала про свой путь и развеяла часть стереотипов.
Оказалось, что в эту сферу можно попасть с нуля или с опытом из другой области, например, маркетинга или пиара. И, кстати, если страшно прыгать в омут с головой, Анна советует начать с малого: стажировка или …
Коротко о том, насколько различается подход к использованию пространства иконок в Китае и на Западе.
Если популярные у нас сервисы практически не меняют дизайн, то китайские маркетологи считают иконку полноценным пространством для коммуникации с клиентом.
Так что у каждого приложения внизу информация об акциях, новых функциях и так далее
таскам время, потехе час ⌛️
Превед из 2006!
Т-Банк запустил ностальгическую игру «Верните мой 2006» — с товарами и предложениями по ценам тех лет. Все, что нужно, — находить предметы из прошлого с выгодой в настоящем.
Посмотри, что там интересного: ссылка.
Сроки акции с 03.08.2026. по 16.08.2026. Подробнее на tbank.ru. АО «ТБанк», лицензия №2673. Реклама. 0+
Рынок труда дошел до такого состояния, что люди начали покупать… карьерные заклинания 😐
На Etsy набирает популярность необычная категория услуг: ведьмы предлагают «заклинания на успешное трудоустройство», «ритуалы для карьерного роста» и даже «магию для получения оффера». Спрос настолько высокий, что вокруг этого уже сформировался отдельный рынок.
Причина проста. Многие соискатели признаются, что хорошее резюме, оп…
«Главный приз — КамАЗ навоза». Фраза, которая звучит как начало анекдота, но в этот раз стала реальностью.
Когда «Суббота» и ОК запускали игру «Дачный ангел», они сразу сделали ставку на неожиданность: никаких привычных айфонов, денег и путешествий. Вместо этого — подарок, который для дачников может оказаться настоящим сокровищем.
Участники проходили уровни в формате «три в ряд», помогали героям сериала и собирали …
Чтобы превратить рекламу в антиутопию, иногда достаточно сделать один шаг в сторону.
Именно так работает билборд, который появился возле британского офиса M*ta в Лондоне. Сначала всё выглядит как обычная реклама очков с Кайли Дженнер. Но стоит изменить угол обзора, и лицо модели превращается в череп с надписью: «We're always watching». Эффект достигается с помощью лентикулярной печати, но настоящий смысл этого трюка…
Два телефона — новый тренд, пишет NY Times. Так жители мегаполиса разграничивают личную и рабочую жизнь.
Когда производителям понадобилось просто продавать больше гаджетов 😓
таскам время, потехе час ⌛️
Как в России называют бизнесы? 🤔
Яндекс Карты изучили названия почти 4 миллионов организаций по всей стране и нашли несколько любопытных закономерностей.
Если в названии организации встречается женское имя, то чаще всего это Елена, Ольга или Анна. Среди животных лидируют кот, лиса и медведь.
Средняя длина нейминга в России — 17 символов. Но встречаются и настоящие минималисты: среди названий из одного символа — се…
Замечали, что летом люди всё чаще хвастаются не отпуском, а урожаем? Базилик, укроп, помидоры?
Если тоже давно хотелось что-нибудь вырастить, Профи.ру сейчас разыгрывает 8 наборов для начинающих садоводов.
А ещё команда сняла ролик вместе со специалистом, который показывает, как подступиться к новому хобби без боли, разочарований и внезапно погибших растений.
Если ролика всё же не хватает, специалисты Профи.ру все…
Слово дня — думджоббинг 🤨
Так называют привычку бесконечно листать вакансии, представлять новую жизнь и карьерные перспективы, но так и не отправлять отклик.
Самое интересное, что термин появился благодаря маленькой девочке, которая заметила, как её отец часами изучает вакансии, но никуда не подаётся.
По сути, это карьерная версия думскроллинга: вакансии смотрим, мечтаем, анализируем, но ничего не меняем.
таскам вр…
👍179❤78🔥59🎉51⚡32🤯7🤔5❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @poteha_time. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Милорд @milord_q · 991,905 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
5 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“таскам время, потехе час” (@poteha_time), 440,785 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poteha_time.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.