Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ссылки, которыми жалко делиться

Channel

Ссылки, которыми жалко делиться

@dontwanttoshare

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,362subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001083789731
TypeChannel
Username@dontwanttoshare
Created14 August 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dontwanttoshare

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,36211,43211,3976 August 2026 — 11,413 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,413 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,411 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,410 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,404 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,400 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,399 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,395 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,392 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,389 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,384 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,386 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,385 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,391 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,402 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,411 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,415 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,410 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,416 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,419 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,432 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,429 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,425 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,417 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,406 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,409 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,403 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,386 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,378 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,373 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,368 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,362 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,352–11,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:2211,362-6
14 Sept 2026, 02:2011,368-5
12 Sept 2026, 10:4011,373-5
10 Sept 2026, 10:1711,378-8
7 Sept 2026, 04:5711,386-17
4 Sept 2026, 10:2211,403-6
1 Sept 2026, 23:5511,409+3
31 Aug 2026, 21:3311,406-11
30 Aug 2026, 19:1611,417-8
29 Aug 2026, 19:3411,425-4
28 Aug 2026, 22:2311,429-3
27 Aug 2026, 22:4811,432+13
26 Aug 2026, 21:0811,419+3
25 Aug 2026, 23:5511,416+6
24 Aug 2026, 23:5511,410-5
23 Aug 2026, 14:3511,415+4
22 Aug 2026, 03:3711,411+9
20 Aug 2026, 22:2611,402+11
20 Aug 2026, 01:3711,391+6
18 Aug 2026, 22:2411,385first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 11,362 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held26 (1 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total9,318
Reactions total336
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,739 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,08262.2%
🔥40223.1%
🥰21812.5%
😁130.748%
🌚90.518%
😎80.46%
🥴40.23%
💊20.115%
🙈10.058%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,739 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:44 UTC878 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Эссе Бьянки Цензори на тему того, почему она не любит давать интервью (а также о красоте и многом другом) на сайте Welcome magazine 🖤

13🔥4🥰2💊1

1 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,240 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Сегодня на уроке английского мы смотрели TED с выступлением Шерил Сендберг. Лет 10 назад ее книга “Не бойся действовать” меня и миллионы женщин во всем мире вдохновляла на то, как делать карьеру в корпоративном мужском мире, да и в целом – как строить карьеру качественно и мечтать по крупному! Да что уж там – несколько лет она являла собой эталон корпоративного феминизма! У меня бывают периоды одной книги, которую я

19🔥9🥰3💊1

31 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈1,400 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Три факта про предпринимателей: Факт №1. Одиночество называют одной из главных проблем предпринимателей. Факт №2. Предприниматели перерабатывают, потому что боятся потерять контроль. Факт №3. Предприниматели в Китае более несчастны. Согласны? Я — на 100% ✅ Цитаты из канала Жизнь как наука. Его автор — Нина Филоненко, сооснователь ECOOKNA Group. Компания с 20-летней историей, >2000 сотрудников и 130+ офисами по в

9🥴4🔥3🥰1

30 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,540 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Indigo cow 🐮:)

33🥰14🔥3😁3

28 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,020 views113 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Сегодня на йоге узнала, что у The Prodigy есть трек с древней санскритской мантрой 🕉️ В традиции дживамункти йоги, которую я практикую порядка 15 лет, есть правило – определять мантру месяца. В этом месяце это мантра Om Namo Narayanaya. И после предодаватель рассказала, что у The Prodigy есть трек Narayan, в конце которого долго поется именно эта мантра. Я пошла все узнавать. Песня написана в 1997 году для альбома

72🥰21🔥15😎4🙈1

25 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,240 views101 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Раз в неделю хожу на наброски и часто наша группа остается без натурщика :) Но мы не отчаиваемся и рисуем друг друга, меняясь в течение практики. На фото рисунки со мной в качестве модели и один набросок со мной за фортепьяно – немного поиграла, пока все собирались.

60🔥25🥰16

23 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈2,470 views78 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Моей любимой кофейней будет та, которая первой введет в меню бульон в стаканчике на вынос 🌝

44🔥21😁9🥰4

22 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈2,550 views94 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ещё немного про Одиссею. В конце фильма была цитата – сверяющая реальность, как пальцы, которые неверующий Фома вставляет в рану Христа: «Новый рассвет наступит над потемневшим миром, когда наши ошибки снова будут забыты». Когда я вышла из кинотеатра, я была уверена, что цитата – интерпретация мысли Гомера. Но нет. Цитата принадлежит Кристоферу Нолану. Нашла, что Нолан объяснил, что его финал – о циклах истории и

70🔥18🌚6

21 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈2,950 views174 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Какая потрясающая новость! Энтони Хопкинс (88 лет!) выпустил свой первый альбом современной классической музыки, выступив как композитор. Включу фоном под свой продуктивный день.

112🔥39🥰23

20 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈2,080 views57 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @ramapaspartuPhoto

Бумага, масляная пастель 42Х51 (размер рамы) Автор Саша Миткалова 40 000 рублей

37🥰12🔥8

19 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈2,100 views82 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @plyushkinfindsPhoto

Дайджест свежих и не очень слухов о Донне Тартт: 1. Активно пишет свой четвертый роман. Поклонники обсуждают этот факт, ссылаясь на немногочисленные интервью писательницы. В небольшом интервью итальянскому журналу она подтвердила, что ей приходится работать над завершением своего четвертого романа. Также в интервью «Королевскому книжному клубу» в 2023 году, отвечая на вопрос о длительности написания каждого романа,

49🔥19🥰14

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @dontwanttoshare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

reading is sexy
@reading_sexy · 33,596
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
FounderWoman
@FounderWoman · 44,887
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Катькало
@Juliacatcalo · 24,237
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
Периодика
@periodicapress · 26,219
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
Канал Вари Веденеевой
@varya_daily · 31,642
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Отчаянный гедонизм
@gedonistique · 21,656
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
Серьезный подход
@tooseriousnotes · 34,119
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
Доктор Жимба
@JutShiClinic · 49,632
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
ОЙСАШ🚀
@etosashaaaa · 54,206
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Девушка с Деньгами
@devushkasdengami · 28,215
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Ksenia_finance
@ksenia_finance · 76,210
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
🅅🄸🅃🄰 🄿🄸🅂🄷🄴🅃
@VITA_PISHET · 23,892
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
Olymarkes Daily
@markesdaily · 28,205
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Mama Nature
@tomnayaa · 43,116
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
Copy Me
@copyme · 26,865
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Полина Мальцева
@polina_education · 121,661
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Ромашковый сбор
@romasheda · 24,491
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Breaking Bread
@dushnilabezmichelina · 39,413
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Новый русский // Культурный код
@newrussian_cc · 50,373
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы
@technohumanist · 37,699
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Соколова наизнанку
@naiznankuo · 58,587
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
SETTERS EDUCATION
@setterseducation · 23,248
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
Media Rare
@media_rare · 23,452
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
ХУЦПА <-> Женя Давыдов
@hutzp · 45,406
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ссылки, которыми жалко делиться” (@dontwanttoshare), 11,362 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dontwanttoshare.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.