Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Шапизнес 🤹🏼‍♀️

@shapizness

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,146subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831687943
TypeChannel
Username@shapizness
Created28 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shapizness

Growth

7,1307,1467,1387 August 2026 — 7,139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,130 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,132 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,146 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,128–7,148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:577,146+14
10 Aug 2026, 23:517,132+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:377,130-9
7 Aug 2026, 13:187,139first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 7,146 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (21 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,723
Reactions total158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

816 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
54166.3%
🔥10512.9%
💯769.31%
😍374.53%
❤‍🔥242.94%
👌101.23%
🏆91.10%
👍91.10%
🐳30.368%
💅10.123%
🤣10.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 816reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 10 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shapizness. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC893 views41 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сижу, разгребаю чаты, в каждом кто-то ждет моего решения по какому-то важному вопросу и думаю, что в последнее время ощущаю себя скалой. Об эту скалу регулярно бьются волны разной степени интенсивности, периодически накрывают цунами, где-то она остается целой, а где-то вода камни-таки подточила, но незначительно. Вспоминаю себя лет 7 назад, тогда такой объем неопределенности, ответственности, необходимости справлять

24😍7💯6❤‍🔥2👍2

28 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,830 views117 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На что не нужно было тратить деньги в Тайни? На днях бизнес-деть отметил 8 месяцев. Смотрю на P&L и хвалю нас за то, что мы очень даже бережливые ребята (✡️), немного было неэффективных инвестиций, но все-таки без них не обошлось. Делюсь, на что мы слили деньги зря — мне кажется, этот опыт кому-то да может быть полезен: 🍄 блогеры с мама-центричным контентом — вы, наверное, удивились, но, да, для нашего продукта пло

79🔥28❤‍🔥8👍1💯1

13 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC≈2,270 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Какая хорошая своей простотой механика подсмотрена у ASH в приложении — буквально реинкарнация легендарной «гиги за шаги» :) Виджет считает сколько шагов пройдено за день, а потом шаги эти можно обменивать на промокоды. Двадцатке предводителей положены призы покрупнее, семь из них смогут даже выбрать парочку обуви. Online-to-offline маркетинг-механики — это супер, особенно когда они максимально нативно встроены в н

❤‍🔥147👍2

8 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,190 views123 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Рандомная мысль дня: в 99,9% случаях команда по дефолту воспринимает нового руководителя негативно, еще до того, как он вышел и успел сказать хотя бы слово :) Каждый мой выход руководителем в сформированную команду с первых секунд сопровождался тоннами скепсиса, недоверия, бывало и саботажа. Никто, увы, не бросается в твои объятия, даже если жизнь с предыдущим лидером (или вообще без него) была тяжелой, а ты призван

86💯26👌10💅1

30 Jun 2026, 13:56 UTC≈2,480 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Точка Банк в очередной раз делает оооочень добротную бизнес-конфу ТОК и попадает в один из главных запросов сегодняшнего дня — дает предпринимателям возможность перенять практический опыт у тех, кто продолжает развивать бизнес, несмотря на любые обстоятельства. В этом году в спикерах снова клевые предприниматели: Иван Шкиря (Callibri, Haunds), Николай Попович из «ВкусВилла» и Beyond Taylor, Дарья Молокова из Simpule

11🔥5👍4🤣1

26 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC≈2,170 views71 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тайни-апдейт! 🎁 В мае-июне я чуть ослабила операционный контроль в Тайни, а хорошие дела там продолжали происходить — ну мед 😊 запустили коллабу-лимиточку с Boft — в каждом боксе теперь дофаминовые фоторамки для фиксации важных моментов детства. и промики на бесплатную печать фотографий! 😊 в экстремистской сети мы медленно, но идем к тому качеству контента, который я хочу видеть. становимся чуууть больше похожи на

50🔥12🏆9

18 Jun 2026, 09:43 UTC≈2,530 views158 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пару месяцев, как я совмещаю управление своим бизнесом, найм и материнство Зовется это нынче портфельной карьерой — когда у тебя есть параллельно несколько «работ» и источников дохода. Видела много текстов, где портфельная карьера романтизируется, но мне это кажется слегка лукавством, и очень хочется добавить субъективной честности в этот разговор — решение диверсифицировать рабочие роли у нашего поколения вызваны т

115💯24🔥19

21 May 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,360 views114 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Фух, зафиксировали рекордно-долгое молчание в этой газетке! Все потому что я решила, видимо, еще чуток проэкспериментировать с вместимостью своей психики и захватила себе еще одну роль. Новость такая: теперь я совмещаю предпринимательство и топ-менеджерство в найме :) Пока не раскрываю деталей куда и кем, но, видимо, здесь теперь будет больше про трендовую нынче портфельную карьеру 🪂 если есть какие-то вопросы и те

73🔥27😍14

29 Apr 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,840 views76 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Остановилась возле стеллажа дочки и думаю — это что, мы такой капсульный гардероб игрушек сами создали? 🥹💔 Меня часто спрашивают в предпринимательской тусовке, почему я решила делать физический бизнес, а не tech, если в техе у меня хорошая экспертиза, он более маржинальный и существенно менее геморный? А вот поэтому. Потому что видеть, что твоя дочка из всего миллиарда игрушек по своей воле выбирает те, что произве

48😍16💯10🐳2

21 Apr 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,700 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мои маркетинг-скрины этой недели🧚🏻‍♀️ Все хорошие кейсы всегда скриню и складываю в отдельную папочку. Вот что из увиденного понравилось на этой недельке: 🖤 оффлайн-механика от студии автопортрета uptoyou: голосование стикером на окне — клево и визуально, и по механике, и с точки зрения метча попсового тренда с бизнесовым кол-ту-экшном 🖤 кастомный дизайн лимонадов от Лапочки для инфлюенсеров — если кастом, то вот т

48🔥14💯9🐳1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @shapizness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 316,222 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 156,041
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шапизнес 🤹🏼‍♀️” (@shapizness), 7,146 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shapizness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.