Я сварила полтора литра джема из дыни за сорок рублей и реально почувствовала себя всемогущей, озарение, что варить можно буквально всё что угодно прям открывает сознание… не шучу
😁70💘24❤12

Channel
@postmodernsoldier
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29,711subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001134748073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @postmodernsoldier |
| Description | девичий блог и безумное бьюти реклама и обратная связь: @postmodern_ad делаю кольца тут: @kikimora_jewelry #post_kosmetos – обзоры косметики #post_perfume – обзоры и новости парфюмерии #post_seshka – барахолки и секонд-хенды |
| Created | 27 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/postmodernsoldier |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 29,711 | +66 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 29,645 | -31 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 29,676 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 29,692 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 29,706 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:40 | 29,711 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 29,715 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (4 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 202,516 |
| Reactions total | 10,726 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,022 reactions across 60 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,333 | 36.9% | |
| 😁 | 1,228 | 13.6% | |
| 😭 | 942 | 10.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 694 | 7.69% | |
| 💯 | 479 | 5.31% | |
| custom 5780832925931017077 | 299 | 3.31% | |
| 🤯 | 231 | 2.56% | |
| 🔥 | 214 | 2.37% | |
| custom 5242222225758639027 | 182 | 2.02% | |
| 🥰 | 177 | 1.96% | |
| 💔 | 168 | 1.86% | |
| 💘 | 138 | 1.53% | |
| custom 5265131705869542493 | 135 | 1.50% | |
| 🙏 | 132 | 1.46% | |
| 💋 | 119 | 1.32% | |
| custom 5438562442332378808 | 105 | 1.16% | |
| 🫡 | 80 | 0.887% | |
| 🐳 | 71 | 0.787% | |
| 💅 | 69 | 0.765% | |
| custom 5447586379074666223 | 62 | 0.687% | |
| 5 further kinds | 164 | 1.82% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,726reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @postmodernsoldier. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я сварила полтора литра джема из дыни за сорок рублей и реально почувствовала себя всемогущей, озарение, что варить можно буквально всё что угодно прям открывает сознание… не шучу
😁70💘24❤12
Черемша из СССР тихо не спеша без суеты появилась в начале года и уже протухла, брейнрот-животных вообще вспоминать стыдно, так что вот вам свежие нейро-хорроры, через месяц испортятся, не благодарите #post_tiktok
😁46❤17custom 543856244233237880810custom 54475863790746662237custom 52422222257586390274❤🔥2🔥1🥰1
Работа Лоры Бенсон
❤98❤🔥30custom 526513170586954249319
14.08 LIZER — ХЕДЛАЙНЕР ПЕРВОГО ДНЯ GRAND OPENING VNVNC 14 августа делаем большое открытие и зовём тех, кто понимает, зачем вообще выходить из дома вечером. новый клуб, новое пространство, большая сцена и первая ночь VNVNC в столице, когда всё это оживёт. первый большой лайв в новом пространстве даст LIZER приходи одним из первых проверить новое место в правильном режиме в лучших традициях шумных и веселых вечерино…
custom 543856244233237880814❤8😁6💋2
«Орбит без сахара» у меня любимая, потому что самая ностальгичная, ассоциируется с целом с чем-то светлым таким (несмотря на текст), с молодыми родителями, это вот прям концентрированные ультимативные нулевые (песня вышла в 98) рашн эдишн… короче эта песня буквально НАША БРИТНИ, вы меня понимаете??
custom 5780832925931017077124🙏60💯30😁11❤10
Рассказал, что полгода назад им пришло письмо от футбольного клуба «Арарат-Армения» с просьбой использовать на стадионе песню «Моё сердце» на армянском языке (теперь придётся идти смотреть футбол) Я услышала «Моё сердце» по радио в детстве и такая — во, ОНО. «Саша Васильев» ещё звучит как среднестатистическое имя батиного друга в наших краях. На концерте, кстати, были дети и подростки, так прикольно. И в целом сред…
❤106😁26custom 578083292593101707719💋3
Люблю концерты, ездила почти на всех любимых дедов (ирония в том, что я выбирала съездить на Кьюр или Ордер, вместо нового телефона, поэтому там пруфы пэрдящие) Сплин очень любила раньше, но давно не слушала. Решила пойти и вообще не пожалела, два часа очень приятно играли, прям видно, что им всем в кайф, и чувствуется такой ПРИЯТНЫЙ питерский флёр, повторюсь, ПРИЯТНЫЙ, хочется покурить у Финского залива сразу
❤136custom 578083292593101707723🤯17💔1custom 54385624423323788081
Зай, могли бы с тобой сюда на Сплин сходить… но ты не приехала ( (нет, правда, очень красивый плейс, я не ожидала)
❤89custom 543856244233237880833😭20💔9😁6
Как человек не обладающей густой гривой я каждый раз смотрю как люди обрезают свои роскошные волосы с таким чувством… эдаким… но красиво
❤108😁24💯17💘5custom 54385624423323788083
#post_tiktok
❤66custom 578083292593101707712custom 54475863790746662237custom 52422222257586390271
У коллаборации MAC Cosmetics и Александра Маккуина 2007 года такая история: Для показа Alexander McQueen осень-зима 2007/08 визажистка Шарлотта Тиллбери вместе с командой MAC создала графичный макияж с отсылкой к образу Клеопатры: яркие синие и зелёные тени, чёрная египетская подводка и светлые губы. Часть оттенков для показа визажисты MAC, включая Терри Барбера, вручную смешали буквально за несколько дней до шоу. …
❤35❤🔥10
Я не смотрела всё это старое поколение ру-блогеров во времена, когда они были популярны, и походу пропустила какой-то дикий лор связанный с ними 😐
custom 524222222575863902749custom 523122165057745727620❤12❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @postmodernsoldier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 3,983 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“как стать девочкой-волшебницей” (@postmodernsoldier), 29,711 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/postmodernsoldier.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.