Channel
@katerinapodlesnyh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001654676197 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @katerinapodlesnyh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/katerinapodlesnyh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 125 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 126 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 127 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 128 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 128 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 3 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5206167027575702307 | 13 | 52.0% | |
| custom 5400294502768334416 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5260730511147422300 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| custom 5397742819748102135 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| custom 6008030420942197739 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| custom 5219698944812012206 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| custom 5253627150635912366 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| custom 5467511763152958382 | 1 | 4.00% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 28 May 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Капитализация аутентичности. Июньская обложка Vogue Korea с Тильдой Суинтон — визуальный шедевр, замаскированный под независимый арт-объект. Но маркер #ad возвращает нас к жесткой экономике. Пока расследования Business of Fashion (BoF) фиксируют прайс в $217 000 за одну рекламную полосу, люксовые конгломераты выкупают медиаплатформы целиком, превращая глянец в дорогой принтер для пресс-релизов. Это не просто смерть…
custom 52061670275757023074custom 54002945027683344163custom 52607305111474223002custom 52196989448120122061
Как же они фармили ауру 🙏— дед и Верджил на Каннском кинофестивале 2011го года в Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Stirling Moss — ультра-редкой модели, которая вышла ограниченным тиражом всего в 75 экземпляров и стоила 1 млн долларов. Вот какие Канны мне нужны, а не эти транквилизаторные вайбы.
custom 52061670275757023073custom 60080304209421977392custom 52536271506359123661
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52061670275757023076custom 53977428197481021352custom 54675117631529583821
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @katerinapodlesnyh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Katerina Podlesnyh” (@katerinapodlesnyh), 125 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katerinapodlesnyh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.