Три всадника апокалипсиса моды в ожидании 4-го

Channel
VOGUE-religion
@religion_vogue
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,744subscribers
+3,252 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001206825405 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @religion_vogue |
| Description | Канал о моде, стиле звезд и светской жизни столицы. VOGUE-religion — самая мирная религия. Личка: @voguereligion Канал включен в реестр Роскомнадзора: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67370323340096358ba3853a®istryType=bloggersPermission #ORWLS |
| Created | 1 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/religion_vogue |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:42 | 25,744 | -32 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 25,776 | -41 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 25,817 | -32 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 25,849 | -58 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 25,907 | -938 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 26,845 | -140 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 26,985 | -192 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:23 | 27,177 | -128 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:43 | 27,305 | -112 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 27,417 | -99 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 27,516 | -93 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 27,609 | -39 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 27,648 | -52 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 27,700 | -98 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 27,798 | -327 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 28,125 | -894 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 29,019 | +5,213 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 23,806 | +362 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 23,444 | +274 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 23,170 | first reading |
Engagement
243 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.64%
- avg views ÷ 25,744 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 680
- 90 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.33%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 92
- of 243 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 85 of 90 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 243 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 61,184 |
| Reactions total | 794 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈63,500
- Videos
- ≈17,100
- Links
- ≈3,990
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 54m 29s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 120 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,475 reactions across 224 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 762 | 30.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 531 | 21.5% | |
| 🔥 | 327 | 13.2% | |
| 🤮 | 164 | 6.63% | |
| ⚡ | 105 | 4.24% | |
| 💔 | 105 | 4.24% | |
| 🤯 | 90 | 3.64% | |
| 🤡 | 84 | 3.39% | |
| 🤩 | 42 | 1.70% | |
| 💋 | 41 | 1.66% | |
| 🕊 | 37 | 1.49% | |
| 🍾 | 34 | 1.37% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 1.01% | |
| 🙏 | 25 | 1.01% | |
| 😱 | 22 | 0.889% | |
| 💅 | 18 | 0.727% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 0.646% | |
| 🏆 | 15 | 0.606% | |
| 🦄 | 13 | 0.525% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 0.323% | |
| 3 further kinds | 11 | 0.444% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 224 of the 243 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,475 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 243 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Лютый беспредел на показе Diesel SS27 в Милане. Это последняя коллекция Глена Мартенса для Дома. Подробнее завтра, пока беглое знакомство.
❤🔥13🔥7🤮6💅2👎1
Стиль рождается на экране А за свежими творческими идеями можно охотится — на седьмом фестивале Word Fashion Shorts, что проходит в рамках Московской Недели Моды. На новой площадке World Fashion Shorts сохранит свой уникальный формат фестиваля-инсталляции. Фестиваль пройдет 27 сентября в Центре цифрового искусства «Внутри» на территории Хлебозавода 9. Из нововведений: партнером World Fashion Shorts стал также Мо…
🕊3
23 сентября в ресторане-дворце «Турандот» пройдет Шахматный турнир Гости смогут принять участие в турнире и побороться за победу или просто наблюдать за партиями в комфортной обстановке. Ведущий будет сопровождать ход турнира и определит сильнейших игроков вечера, которые получат подарки от «Турандот»: билеты на балет «Спящая красавица», который пройдет в стенах ресторана-дворца в октябре, и сертификаты на бранч. П…
❤🔥1
Prada SS2027: когда красота снова вступает в диалог с телом Коллекция сезона ss27 — не про радикальный разрыв, а про возвращение к сути: вещи наконец-то «приземлились» и начали работать на женщину, а не против неё. Многослойность, игра фактур, футуризм — и при этом никакой агрессии к силуэту. Да, остались спорные детали (те самые выходные бюстгалтеры), но общий вектор радует: Prada снова про интеллектуальный шик, к…
💋3👍1
Prada ss27
🤮3🤩2
Хаетер Шафер появилась на сегодняшнем миланском показе Prada
❤🔥9🤮4
Алессандро Микеле появился в Милане перед своим показом в Париже, который состоится через несколько дней.
🍓3
Началось неотвратимое Intimissimi на 83‑м Венецианском кинофестивале 🎬 спонсор фестиваля
🍓4🍾1🔥1
В Сети бурно обсуждают появление Мариуса Борга Хёйби на похоронах короля Харальда V — образ сына норвежской королевы окрестили «траурным шиком», а самого Мариуса в соцсетях прозвали «похоронным секс‑символом». Несмотря на приговор в 4 года за изнасилования и домашний арест, Хёйби получил отгул специально для участия в траурной церемонии. Хотя при жизни у него не было близких отношений с покойным монархом, он нёс гро…
🤮5🤯4🍓1💔1
Ну как тут угнаться, когда Кендалл ставит перед модницами новую задачу - дорожная сумка ручной клади, с которой она появилась сегодня в Венеции на кинофестивале
❤🔥12🤡2💔1
На Китай-городе городе открылось французское бистро Oui Oui В основе концепции — французская классика в быстром и современном формате с элементами стритфуда. Среди главных блюд — стейк Entrecôte с картофелем фри и соусом антрекот, тартар на хрустящем крокете, салат нисуаз с картофелем фри и Croissant-dog — свежеиспеченный круассан с говяжьей колбаской, огуречным релишем и фирменным горчичным соусом. Меню планируют …
❤🔥2⚡1👍1🤡1🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 243 posts we hold for @religion_vogue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@religion_vogue edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 19 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто идеальное лицо бренда "Эконика"?
- Ида Галич6%
- Надежда Стрелец8%
- Оксана Самойлова2%
- Анна Семенович3%
- Настя Ивлеева7%
- Анна Седокова1%
- Ольга Бузова3%
- Анастасия Миронова6%
- Алексей Жидковский23%
- Роузи Хантингтон-Уайтли42%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 243 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@elegantiae_a · 43,1063 postsOlga Shvets Style Laser❤️
@olgashvetsstylelaser · 53 postsБАЙЕР ВСЕЯ РУСИ
@ROSTOVSHCHIKOV · 4541 postIrena Soprano | Fashion-дизайнер
@SopranoIrena · 2261 postСветлана Парикмахер Малиновка
@Svetlanazelenogradsk · 1631 postСЮМБЕЛЬ | ЖИЗНЬ | МОДА
@SyumbelMODA · 521 postVintage aesthetics
@Vintage_aesthet · 511 postБал дебютанток
@baldebut · 22,7271 postCORNER SHOP LIFE STYLE
@cornershopstore_tg · 4821 postdoopiidoo
@doopiidoo · 331 postЯМОДЕЛЬ
@imodelvlg · 4101 postKADTVAPhotography
@kadtvaphotography · 1951 postКудряво живу
@kudryavo_jivu · 3031 postГеоргиева Снежанна
@marvelous2309 · 38,3041 postNappe Bistro
@nappebistro · 7221 postnazarkina: крепкий и сладкий
@ohnazarkina · 3181 postРоорБьюти
@roorbeauty · 771 post«очень по-соловски»
@sol_selivanovaolga · 3,3741 postSOLANGEL
@solangel_official · 2711 postМегаАлекс
@tonkonog_alex · 591 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@dubapparels · 20,2162 postsAMI CHAISE
@ami_chaise · 9741 postby SKOROKHODOVA
@by_skorokhodova · 2521 postDRESS BY STESHA
@DressbyStesha · 3,3731 postEliso Bistro
@eliso_bistro · 1,4841 postGiveShareBot - бот для розыгрышей
@GiveShareBot · 841,8281 postISSI Spirits
@issi_spirits · 9,8941 postМосковская неделя моды
@mosfweek · 21,7181 postOUI OUI BISTRO
@ouiouibistro · 1661 postРУШЕВ В УШИ
@rushevonline · 18,0381 postUmami Gastrobar
@umamigastrobar · 161 postРесторан «Восход»
@voshodrest · 3,7701 postWorld Fashion Shorts
@worldfashionshorts · 3931 postЗвук | Музыкальный сервис
@zvuk_sound · 37,4361 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ksbchk · 372,627#1
@umagazine_russia · 2,738#2
@fashion_mur · 208,487#3
@sncmag · 301,518#4
@goldchihuahua · 91,479#5
@theblueprintnews · 72,402#6
@strelets_molodec · 355,464#7
@mamkina · 30,156#8
@imnomimalone · 5,321#9
@LIVfashionmag · 203,725#10
@Peopletalkru · 182,678#11
@mukhinss · 55,055#12
@poorichgirl · 43,731#13
@drunkfashion · 40,044#14
@zlayakiska · 73,280#15
@pechenuwki · 34,394#16
@superficialspacecadet · 24,701#17
@editorsonvacation · 20,352#18
@lifestylewhat · 46,126#19
@Buro247_ru · 25,677#20
@kseniadenisovna · 33,821#21
@darkvoicemag · 44,818#22
@styledbysmo · 38,718#23
@pinkbirkin · 13,881#24
@straightface · 21,113#25
@aleko_n17 · 104,218#26
@artemkrivda · 6,761#27
@hellobeautygirl · 14,113#28
@copyme · 26,865#29
@arbuzimargiela · 20,431#30
@marinagolomazdina · 120,608#31
@northitaly · 29,092#32
@yagodnoelukoshko10 · 7,799#33
@MinogarovaNews · 95,130#34
@burimovasasha · 81,553#35
@ramilmustav · 11,890#36
@dukaliti · 123,032#37
@alionadol · 76,246#38
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,809#39
@darkmgimo · 106,682#40
@goodmorningkarl · 56,190#41
@zashmot · 107,495#42
@spletni_tg · 187,774#43
@kureelka · 124,870#44
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693#45
@mash · 3,096,804#46
@tatlersheroine · 100,724#47
@bloodysx · 1,158,879#48
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141#49
@theblueprintru · 96,067#50
@devilwearshandm · 72,684#51
@moscowmap · 2,674,200#52
@moskvichka_mag · 102,398#53
@meduzalive · 1,121,201#54
@rogov24 · 189,541#55
@svintrovert · 84,110#56
@imnotbozhena · 504,326#57
@thynk · 70,798#58
@omanko · 114,097#59
@shipilovaks · 46,907#60
@budnigalliano · 27,853#61
@ksenia_solovieva · 52,010#62
@svetskiekroshki · 79,850#63
@sashaonline · 86,526#64
@ibragimgatsievv · 13,495#65
@wearfeelings · 70,024#66
@luka_ebkov · 431,305#67
@Lauradjagadiary · 76,529#68
@tdmood · 21,678#69
@noname_buro · 18,078#70
@theblueprintcareer · 141,233#71
@istominakarina · 157,537#72
@sale_caviar · 192,936#73
@minaevlife · 318,729#74
@glavmoskvichka · 34,961#75
@neposlednielyudi · 57,679#76
@mosnow · 451,848#77
@goshakartsev · 88,841#78
@naumita · 60,091#79
@rbc_news · 905,528#80
@mironovanastasiia · 150,240#81
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390#82
@ostorozhno_moskva · 391,203#83
@aboutfasshion · 3,364#84
@theosdnew · 47,490#85
@frontroww · 45,612#86
@moscowtinderr · 740,982#87
@pravilamagru · 63,798#88
@lider · 176,017#89
@fashiondnevnik · 26,418#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@istorikmod · 25,988
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
@fashion · 135,781
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@LIVfashionmag · 203,725
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
@mamkina · 30,156
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@theblueprintnews · 72,402
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
@fashion_mur · 208,487
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
@Buro247_ru · 25,677
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@drunkfashion · 40,044
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@EvelinaFashionSchool · 82,588
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
@darkvoicemag · 44,818
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
@okeymood · 35,781
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
@zlayakiska · 73,280
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
@marieclairerussia · 21,621
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 September 2026
@wfcru · 26,198
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
@mosfweek · 21,718
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
@devilwearshandm · 72,684
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@hacking_fashion · 33,556
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@zashmot · 107,495
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@fashionpaper · 53,233
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@budnigalliano · 27,853
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
@style · 161,866
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@Ms_krasota · 63,614
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@moskvichka_mag · 102,398
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
@svetskiekroshki · 79,850
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VOGUE-religion” (@religion_vogue), 25,744 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/religion_vogue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.