Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Булавка в мире моды

Channel

Булавка в мире моды

@fashionsegment

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,121subscribers

-231 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002045134614
TypeChannel
Username@fashionsegment
DescriptionЗдесь админ и три его субличности рассуждают о моде По вопросам сотрудничества писать @MinkevichKatya Мы в реестре РКН - https://clck.ru/3FUMPa
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fashionsegment

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,89426,45526,174.57 August 2026 — 26,352 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,352 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,345 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,335 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,327 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,321 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,307 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,292 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,282 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,261 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,118 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,011 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,963 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,894 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,066 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,190 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,250 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,242 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,299 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,327 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,362 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,409 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,427 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,371 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,318 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,294 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,388 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,377 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,257 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,275 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,239 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,180 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,237 subscribers19 September 2026 — 26,455 subscribers25 September 2026 — 26,121 subscribers26,1217 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -231. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,810–26,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 14:5926,121-334
19 Sept 2026, 02:3826,455+218
16 Sept 2026, 20:1926,237+57
15 Sept 2026, 01:3926,180-59
13 Sept 2026, 10:1826,239-36
11 Sept 2026, 11:2226,275+18
8 Sept 2026, 21:2126,257-120
5 Sept 2026, 14:1726,377-11
3 Sept 2026, 12:3526,388+94
2 Sept 2026, 09:2926,294-24
1 Sept 2026, 11:3426,318-53
31 Aug 2026, 08:2426,371-56
30 Aug 2026, 08:5726,427+18
29 Aug 2026, 05:4726,409+47
28 Aug 2026, 05:0426,362+35
27 Aug 2026, 05:1626,327+28
26 Aug 2026, 06:5826,299+57
25 Aug 2026, 04:3526,242-8
24 Aug 2026, 03:1326,250+60
22 Aug 2026, 12:2726,190first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.58%
avg views ÷ 26,121 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held66 (3 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total39,618
Reactions total543
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 22:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈22,000
Videos
≈4,150
Links
≈1,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 34s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,272 reactions across 66 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,29256.9%
🔥30413.4%
custom 53144053144459899911376.03%
🥰1205.28%
custom 5251300249024092455813.57%
❤‍🔥753.30%
👍733.21%
💘703.08%
👎251.10%
🍓170.748%
🤔130.572%
👀110.484%
👏110.484%
😍110.484%
😁100.44%
🤩80.352%
🏆60.264%
🐳60.264%
💋20.088%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 66 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fashionsegment. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC336 views11 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @okarputPhoto

Готовьте магний или какие другие успокоительные средства, потому что рубрика #сколькостоит снова в деле 💵 Сегодня на очереди — репортаж с re-see новой коллекции Демны для Gucci: ✅ Основной вывод о коллекции: все не то, чем кажется. Самые дорогие вещи сезона — не всегда самые эффектные и знаковые. Стриженная дубленка может прикидываться пальтишком, пуховик — огромной барской шубой, а крокодиловый ридикюльчик почтенно…

❤9👍1🔥1

27 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC232 views7 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Ну что, фиксируем: Демна в Gucci — это когда ты заходишь в шоурум присмотреть платье на вечер, а выходишь с нервным тиком и четким осознанием, что твоя почка на черном рынке — это максимум кружевная комбинашка со стразами (да-да, та самая, которая entry price за €7 500)

❤6💘1

27 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC331 views7 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Сэм Виссер замешал гламур нулевых и гранж. И мы это одобряем! Пока все судорожно наносили прозрачные блески и делали «макияж без макияжа», бьюти-директор Сэм Виссер на показе Gucci Spring/Summer 2027 в Милане решил, что с нас хватит минимализма. Встречайте новый главный тренд сезона — тотальный камбэк гранжа и эстетики indie sleaze. Главной фишкой шоу стали экстремальные XXL-смоки. Забудьте про идеальную тушевку час…

❤5💘2

26 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC813 views19 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Новая глава легенды: «Посвящение Создателю» 🕊️ Показ только что закончился, и мы до сих пор под впечатлением! Дом Моды Вячеслава Зайцева представил свою первую кутюрную коллекцию после ухода Маэстро — «Dédicace au Créateur». Команда трудилась над ней целый год, и это было мощно. В роли приглашенного дизайнера дебютировал Николай Красников — победитель кучи конкурсов, участник Недели моды в Москве и, что самое главн…

❤16custom 53144053144459899912💘1

26 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC422 views17 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Вот это драма! И я это не про нашумевший фильм с Паттинсоном и Зендеей. Сексуальность и готика просто как огонь и масло сошлись в образе Лены Перминовой. Думаю, самой красивой гостьей шоу Blumarine нашу красавицу все признали безоговорочно 🔥

❤14👍1🔥1🥰1

26 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC509 views9 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Главный экспонат В Музее Москвы вовсю гремит ярмарка молодого искусства blazar, и у нас тут образовался идеальный фэшн-мэтч! Смотрите, какой красивый парный выход (кажется, негласный): • Ксения Чилингарова пришла на превью в крутейшем костюме в полоску от Pitkina. Расслабленно и очень к месту среди арт-объектов. К слову, брюки от этого костюма были замечены и по отдельности. • Никита Кроко — молодой и дико перспек…

❤8🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 06:53 UTC≈26,300 views28 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Нравится, как Мария Михеева сняла Ксению Собчак для первого печатного выпуска Fashion Paper. Стилизовал съемку Ибрагим Гатциев. Красивая работа и такой рафинированный вайб. Отличный старт издания - Булавка поддерживает!

❤23😁3🔥2

24 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC166 views7 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Вы знаете, как сильно я люблю моду с историей, но то, что произошло со мной на днях — это абсолютно новый уровень. Модный дом Вячеслава Зайцева пригласил меня на свой грядущий показ в качестве VIP-гостя. Не менее приятно, что мне предложили дрессинг! Да-да, они открыли для меня святая святых — закрытые архивные фонды Дома Slava Zaitsev, чтобы я могла лично прикоснуться к истории и выбрать себе уникальный лук для пок…

🔥4🥰3

23 Sept 2026, 11:44 UTC570 views18 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Clean girls звонят в 911: Булавка и её «нюдик» для похода в библиотеку. Не делись секретами - просто получаю удовольствие и вам советую не скромничать. Все любимые средства указала в видео. Внимание: трюк выполнен непрофессионалом и без страховки. Повторять в домашних условиях РЕКОМЕНДУЮ! 💋🧷

❤15💘2🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC669 views22 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Махараджа и советский модернизм: смотрим кампейн YANA FW'26-27 Если вы думали, что роскошный тяжелый люкс и строгая геометрия несовместимы, то бренд YANA зашел с козырей. Новая коллекция «Сад Драгоценностей» — это буквально визуальный роман о том, как индийский махараджа Яшвант Рао Холкар II и его жена Саньогита Дэви в начале XX века решили, что классических сари им мало, и уехали на Лазурный берег. Они были настол…

🔥14❤8

21 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC655 views18 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

На днях Булавка забегала на презентацию новых украшений Rushev. Ну что, готовим наши кошелечки, потому что в новом сезоне Гоша явно решил нас слегка разорить. Делает он это виртуозно - если уйдете из его бутика без красивейшего обвеса, просто расскажите мне, где вы тренировали свою волю! Я коллекцией Sacrament приятно впечатлилась и уже думаю о том, в какие образы вписать всю эту роскошную готику.

❤18

21 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC645 views25 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Самый простой, но невероятно симпатичный способ сделать макияж праздничным и даже волшебным - подглядела на бекстейдже шоу Coach (про него писала тут). Просто берём глянцевые конфетти и клеим… везде. Пятница начинается в понедельник! (почти, как у Стругацких) ✨

❤19💘6

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @fashionsegment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Не бьюти единым
@nebeauty_blog · 74,667
#1
vogue is my religion
@voguemr · 104,688
#2
Москва носит Биркин
@mos_glyanec · 121,638
#3
ХАЛКУС
@kkhalkus · 110,243
#4
FLACON MAGAZINE
@flacon_mag · 46,299
#5
Банки-склянки
@bankiskyanki · 101,258
#6
Вороны-москвички
@mosvorona · 41,031
#7
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339
#8
KOSTI
@kosti · 560,192
#9
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 4,076,789
#10
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 407,543
#11
SLA
@style_level_agreement · 2,419
#12
BeautyLab
@beautylabss · 20,063
#13
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,668,820
#14
Мос-Анджелес
@mosandgeles · 7,687
#15
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016
#16
барашик лизок @barrashik
@barrashikliza · 368,471
#17
ох
@theohdaily · 177,106
#18
rutkismary
@rutkismary · 333,341
#19
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,584
#20
SHTOLL NEWS💋
@SHTOLLNEWS · 519,842
#21
so sad so sеху
@welcometomyisland · 243,415
#22
ФРОНТ РОУ
@frontroww · 45,784
#23
MUR
@fashion_mur · 208,487
#24
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,108,884
#25
888
@by888blog · 16,646
#26
TrendWatching
@trendwatching24 · 1,432,720
#27
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,144,206
#28
Ты в тренде или уходи
@trendsetter · 1,432,849
#29
INSTASAMKA
@instasamkacore · 434,827
#30
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,646
#31
о смешном и важном(иногда)
@chirikulkins · 8,204
#32
Бьюти баночки
@beautyjars · 17,127
#33
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,409
#34
Hi, Darling
@hidarling_ru · 28,398
#35
КК
@petrovtel · 525,264
#36
Москва+
@moscowplus · 1,203,514
#37
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336
#38
Mash
@mash · 3,110,586
#39
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 740,982
#40
Биг сити лайф
@big_city_l · 31,429
#41
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401
#42
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,701
#43
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 331,915
#44
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 743,409
#45
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,059,396
#46
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 636,947
#47
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 390,717
#48
Первый Московский
@mosguru · 3,234,966
#49
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,134,958
#50
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 735,741
#51
Москва Live
@msk_live · 1,808,438
#52
Любимый ВПШ 😮‍💨
@lyubimyivpsh · 143,446
#53
Москва на максималках
@mosjournal · 386,973
#54
Неприятный канал
@unpleasent · 491,819
#55
GENSYXA
@gensyka · 270,231
#56
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,048,279
#57
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 474,884
#58
NN
@naebnet · 2,178,705
#59
Москва - это интересно
@mskint · 3,351,872
#60
SCORPIO BABY
@scorpiiobae · 8,653
#61

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Не бьюти единым
@nebeauty_blog · 74,667
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 August 2026
vogue is my religion
@voguemr · 104,688
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
Москва носит Биркин
@mos_glyanec · 121,638
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Банки-склянки
@bankiskyanki · 101,258
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
Это Лиза
@etolizochka · 120,950
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
Hi, Darling
@hidarling_ru · 28,398
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
FOR ME
@forme · 132,621
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
Биг сити лайф
@big_city_l · 31,429
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 5 September 2026
москоугёрлз
@mossgirls · 955,222
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Булавка в мире моды” (@fashionsegment), 26,121 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashionsegment.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.