Channel
@lowfashion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,328subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001563337598 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lowfashion |
| Description | Я — Женя, а это мой канал о стиле и на стиле. Все о моде и ее изнанке — на кого смотреть и что-где-зачем покупать. РКН: https://clck.ru/3G4kBd |
| Created | 18 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lowfashion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 9,328 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 9,344 | -33 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 9,377 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 9,377 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 10 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 103 | 54.8% | |
| 🔥 | 82 | 43.6% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Тем временем Vogue и Pinterest телеграфируют о тренде на капусту всех видов и сортов. Cabbage crush trend пока захватил умы только свадебной индустрии и декора. Даешь брокколи вместо классического букета невесты и качан капусты вместо подсвечника.
❤14🔥14
Ваш админ пытается согнать килограммы оливье после праздников.
❤11🔥9
Достаем двойные листочки и выписываем все тренды 2016-го года. Как пишет Vogue Business, за первые дни нового года ностальгия по эпохе Lemonade активно распространялась среди пользователей соцсетей. Время было неплохое, да и не только же серым костюмом Nike Мадуро будем сыты в этом модном сезоне.
🔥12❤9
Абсолютно не удивлена, напротив, даже странно, что кто-то думал иначе 👜 Glitz Paris утверждает, что Hermes системно «профилирует» клиентов перед тем, как дать им доступ к покупке Биркин и Келли. То есть, смотрят не только на историю покупок у бренда, а якобы гуглят домашние адреса клиентов, чтобы понять, «достаточно ли престижно» место проживания, проверяют соцсети и то, какой контент человек публикует (мне пизда), …
❤8🔥7
Пока мы отсыпались и доедали новогодние салаты, в мире родилась новая it-girl — художница и жена нового мэра Нью-Йорка Рама Дуваджи. После избрания политика соцсети заполонили ролики о том, как в скором времени будут выглядеть все девушки мегаполиса (покрытыми, – если не видели). Но не тут-то было! 28-летняя Дуваджи – отчаянная модница, занимается керамикой и иллюстрацией. Её работы публиковались в Washington Post, …
❤13🔥9
Ни слова больше...
❤14🔥7💔3
Мы не осуждаем, но мы обсудим: как вам первый рабочий понедельник 2026-го?
❤17🔥12
Симпатичная съемка ювелирки у корейского GQ однако.
❤17🔥12
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lowfashion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На примерке” (@lowfashion), 9,328 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lowfashion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.