Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for в рехабе все спокойно

Channel

в рехабе все спокойно

@vrehabevsespok

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,763subscribers

-170 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001887082851
TypeChannel
Username@vrehabevsespok
DescriptionПравда в рехабе По всем вопросам — @SvetTate Номер заявки РКН № 6985934941
Created26 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vrehabevsespok

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,67512,96512,8207 August 2026 — 12,933 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,935 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,929 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,924 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,915 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,908 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,907 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,911 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,906 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,903 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,959 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,965 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,935 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,933 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,921 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,923 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,918 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,914 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,922 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,896 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,869 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,862 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,874 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,873 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,842 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,826 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,799 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,766 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,730 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,720 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,699 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,725 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,729 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,752 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,723 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,732 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,709 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,705 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,700 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,701 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,696 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,691 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,695 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,683 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,679 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,696 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,690 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,688 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,680 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,675 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,676 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,694 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,698 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,710 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,714 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,711 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,705 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,741 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,758 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,763 subscribers12,7637 August 20267 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,632–13,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 12:5712,763+5
6 Nov 2026, 15:4012,758+17
5 Nov 2026, 15:2612,741+36
4 Nov 2026, 17:4712,705-6
3 Nov 2026, 16:0912,711-3
2 Nov 2026, 14:0612,714+4
1 Nov 2026, 13:3512,710+12
31 Oct 2026, 11:1012,698+4
30 Oct 2026, 07:3812,694+18
29 Oct 2026, 06:3012,676+1
28 Oct 2026, 01:1012,675-5
27 Oct 2026, 03:0612,680-8
25 Oct 2026, 05:0912,688-2
24 Oct 2026, 07:4912,690-6
23 Oct 2026, 05:1912,696+17
22 Oct 2026, 03:2812,679-4
20 Oct 2026, 19:2712,683-12
19 Oct 2026, 20:4612,695+4
18 Oct 2026, 21:0512,691-5
17 Oct 2026, 17:3612,696first reading

Engagement

215 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.60%
avg views ÷ 12,763 subscribers
Avg views / post
587
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 215 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held215 (6 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total23,479
Reactions total1,518
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈210,000
Videos
≈28,300
Links
≈5,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 20m
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 100 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,681 reactions across 210 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,14947.8%
😁89710.3%
👀5796.67%
💔3874.46%
custom 54067354633586839943163.64%
🔥3023.48%
❤‍🔥2973.42%
custom 52557409832151368572442.81%
🤣2222.56%
😱1701.96%
🗿1691.95%
🥰1681.94%
🤮1411.62%
🌚790.91%
custom 5388942594967363784760.875%
👍640.737%
💅530.611%
🤯510.587%
😎490.564%
💯430.495%
17 further kinds2252.59%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 212 of the 215 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,681 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 215 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 18:54 UTC310 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

А Ариана Гранде привлекла своего бойфренда, Рикки Альвареса, к рекламе личного бьюти-бренда) У нас тут даже легкая эротика…

custom 538894259496736378412👀5❤1

7 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC409 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Битлов продолжают снимать! Как вы понимаете, на двух первых фото — оригинальные Битлы) Ну, вдруг вы спутаете))

❤10🤯4👍2🤮1😁1

7 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC868 views70 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ну, наши подозрения подтвердились уже точно)) Габбриетт на приличном сроке беременности. Это они с Мэтти Хили идут на презентацию нового альбома Джесси Джо Старк (дочь основателей Chrome Hearts, крестница Шер, девушка Янгблада. Он, кстати, как раз писал о ее альбоме, просил нас всех поддержать ее))

❤44🤯16custom 53886785231981342019👍1

7 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,180 views73 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ох, ну апдейты по делу отца Меган Маркл… Федеральный магистратский судья Линдси Гриффин постановила освободить Томаса Маркла под залог и вернуть в дом престарелых — учреждение, в котором он и был арестован. Обвиняемому запрещено контактировать с несовершеннолетними; кроме того, ему запрещено пользоваться любыми устройствами, имеющими доступ к интернету, или владеть ими. Маркл будет находиться под электронным набл…

😱47🤮19❤4custom 52557409832151368572👀1

7 Nov 2026, 03:22 UTC661 views83 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ахаахаххаахавха))) Доброе, блять, утро)))

😁59😎14❤6🤣4

6 Nov 2026, 21:39 UTC≈1,070 views96 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

О, чел, хорошую жизнь прожил, жалко, что мало… Тебя ж растерзают! Игрока «Нью-Йорк Никс» Тайлера Колека во время участия в трансляции NBA 2K League вместе с одноклубником Дьюсом Макбрайдом спросили, кто из знаменитостей, посещающих матчи команды, делает это, скорее, «напоказ». На это он ответил: «На играх "Никс" все выглядит очень наигранно. Многие приходят просто чтобы засветиться, а не потому, что они настоящие ф…

😁63❤16👏12💯3👀1🤮1

6 Nov 2026, 21:13 UTC≈1,030 views43 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Тем временем, дюновские снова зовут нас в кино) Так, ну уже ждем смену локаций, нарядов и прочего, а то они там сотню коротких видосов в один день наснимали, похоже, и теперь выдают нам порционно.… #тикайизпустыни

❤36👀3🔥2🤮1🥰1

6 Nov 2026, 21:06 UTC964 views75 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Какие милые детеныши у Сиенны Миллер и Оли Грина!! И есть Сиенна аппетитно, завтра ПРИДЕТСЯ бургер покупать… Чуть менее органический, чем у Сиенны из Erewhon, но ничего, переживу это…

❤58👏11🥰4👀1custom 52557235714177194791

6 Nov 2026, 20:56 UTC994 views59 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Барри Кеоган для Modern Boxing Journal

❤37💅8🤮7👀6⚡1

6 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC64 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Джулианна Мур для Vogue Adria. Напомню, что по-прежнему Джулианна главная претендентка на Оскар за роль в фильме «Дебют» Джесси Айзенберга)

❤6❤‍🔥2🔥2

6 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC371 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Я вам отвечаю, они нас жестко газлайтят)) Утром с новостями из паба, где разболтали имя будущего Бонда вышли The Sun, вечером — DeuxMoi тоже примерно с таким же инсайдом, но имя другое: Один из читателей портала рассказал, что недавно встретил члена съемочной группы сериала «Медленные лошади» (Slow Horses) в лондонском Чайна-тауне. По словам читателя, этот сотрудник назвал Лоудена «следующим Джеймсом Бондом», а на во…

😁21❤4🤮2custom 53889425949673637842custom 52557409832151368571

6 Nov 2026, 18:36 UTC479 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Да вы че, прикалываетесь? В чем тут новость? Про мультик по «Сумеркам» писала еще в 2024 году… 6 августа этого года писала, что начался подбор голосов, поэтому удивлена, что даже большие зарубежные киноканалы пишут об этом всем, будто информация впервые появилась в медиаполе… Из обновлений только то, что Netflix сразу заказали не один, а два сезона сериала… Вы как, смотреть будете?) Ну а эти мужики с огромной радо…

😁16❤3🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 215 posts we hold for @vrehabevsespok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Печенюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 36,577
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
Darky || Дарки
@sheisdarky · 40,069
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,185
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
russiansinlondon
@russiansinlnd · 21,245
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“в рехабе все спокойно” (@vrehabevsespok), 12,763 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vrehabevsespok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.