Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 94 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,749–11,892 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 20:40
11,767
-5
7 Nov 2026, 14:45
11,772
-3
6 Nov 2026, 15:16
11,775
+4
5 Nov 2026, 18:28
11,771
-1
4 Nov 2026, 18:47
11,772
+1
3 Nov 2026, 21:16
11,771
-3
2 Nov 2026, 18:48
11,774
+9
1 Nov 2026, 17:41
11,765
-8
31 Oct 2026, 16:08
11,773
-5
30 Oct 2026, 17:00
11,778
-3
29 Oct 2026, 17:18
11,781
+3
28 Oct 2026, 17:11
11,778
-6
27 Oct 2026, 16:20
11,784
-3
26 Oct 2026, 15:06
11,787
+3
25 Oct 2026, 13:41
11,784
-2
24 Oct 2026, 15:16
11,786
+3
23 Oct 2026, 15:07
11,783
-10
22 Oct 2026, 14:48
11,793
-8
21 Oct 2026, 08:18
11,801
-2
20 Oct 2026, 08:34
11,803
first reading
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 11,767 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
66 (28 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
27,954
Reactions total
651
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 20:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 25s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,224 reactions across 65 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,428
64.2%
❤🔥
358
16.1%
🔥
339
15.2%
🥰
72
3.24%
🐳
18
0.809%
🕊
9
0.405%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,224 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Приятные новости от бренда Pitkina - у них стартовал Sharlotka season sale.
А это значит, что те самые полосатые свитера, рубашки в с голубыми манжетами и многое другое можно купить с приятной скидкой до 30%. Накануне холодов купить свитер по хорошей цене у любимого бренда - настоящая инвестиция в зимний гардероб.
Акция продлится офлайн в магазинах бренда и онлайн на сайте до 10 ноября, потому спешите купить то, что …
Это моя любимая иллюстратор из Нью-Йорка Блейр Вильямс, aka Blairz в запретграме.
Будь я владелицей большого бренда, давно бы заказала ей кампейн.
https://t.me/ksubeauty/10090
Выходя сегодня из дома обратила внимание: только у меня стоит 3 пары Age of Innocence в коридоре. А еще у Любы и Алины.
Мы носим и любим Age of Innocence много лет, и потому я всегда жду с нетерпением новую коллекцию.
В этот раз бренд угодил и любителям классики, сделав роскошные замшевые сапоги до колена без каблука, лодочки из синей глянцевой кожи, и порадовал тех, кто предпочитает тренды: для них ( и меня в том чи…
Обожаю эту олдскульную французскую банду: Николя Гескьера, Эди Слимана.
Это фото своей коллекции 2009 года для Balenciaga он выложил как реакцию на увольнение Пиччоли и, видимо, грядущие перемены в доме моды великого испанского кутюрье.
Напомнил, так сказать, что Balenciaga не только вытянутые майки и джинсы оверсайз.
Ну и всё. Дождались. Мартин Роуз - креативный директор Balenciaga.
Думаю, продержится года полтора. Balenciaga больше, чем футболка оверсайз и деконструированная ветровка.
Metier D’Art Матье Блази из Нью-йоркской подземки оказывается было в фильме Роберта Олтмэна “Pret-a-porter”.
В фильме идет показ африканского бренда XULY. Bët.
На дворе был 1994 год.
Фильм обязателен к просмотру: идеальный план на вечер пятницы.
Star Wars energy.
Боб Дилан на приеме у Папы Римского.
А худи короля рока - Fursac от Готье Борсарелло, основателя нашего любимого L’Etiquette Magazine.
Во Франции есть шутливое выражение Monsieur de Fursac, обозначающее слишком модного мужчину. В случае с Бобом Диланом слишком в принципе быть не может. Ему позволено всё.
На ночь глядя про уход Пьерпаоло Пиччоли из Balenciaga.
Третье увольнение группы Kering за последние пару недель может самое логичное, но насколько обидное.
Дело в том, что, нанимая итальянского до мозга костей дизайнера, способного кроить самые красивые вечерние платья, Kering хотел от него streetwear по ценам pret-a-porter. Потому он создавал нелепые кроссовки и трико, пытаясь облечь уличную моду в ту самую присущу…
Тема Met Gala такая унылая, что лучше вспомним роскошные архивы Dolce Gabbana, которыми сейчас вдохновляются все бренды и модницы мира.
Осень-зима 1998 года, когда по подиуму выхаживали модели в атласных пальто с вышивкой с меховой отделкой.
Все новое - это хорошо забытое старое. И у Dolce Gabbana это старое намного интереснее нового.
Находка дня - сатиновый шопер от RUBAN. Самая модная сумка сезона весна/лето 2027 по версии сестер Рубан и Олсен.
У наших версия даже интереснее - необработанные швы и контрастная подкладка.
Носить можно и днем, и вечером - просто согните шопер пополам.
Атласная фактура делает свое дело и сумка превращается в нарядный аксессуар.
Миучче Прада вручили премию «Серебряная леди» 2026 года в музее Полди Пиццоли в Милане 27 октября 2026 года «за создание великого глобального лидерского сообщества в области моды и за поддержание крепкого связи с Миланом и его художественным и творческим наследием, за филантропичную и солидарную акцию в поддержку гуманитарных организаций и поддержку медицинской науки».
Про глобальное лидерское сообщество в мире моды …
❤23
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @fashion_smoothie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Copy Me @copyme · 26,681 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Сделай лицо попроще @straightface · 21,155 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
РазразиМеняМаржела @arbuzimargiela · 20,692 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 September 2026
EvelinaFashionSchool @EvelinaFashionSchool · 86,496 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Style @style · 155,238 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
shoes&drinks @shoesanddrinks · 27,049 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
World Fashion Channel @wfcru · 25,634 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
Style Tricks @styletricks · 24,001 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
Будни Гальяно @budnigalliano · 27,789 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Bon Mot @lebonmot · 36,871 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
time vs. vogue @time_vs_vogue · 33,912 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Безфильтров @bezfiltrov_show · 28,829 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Отдел стиль жизни @lifestylewhat · 45,690 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fashion smoothie” (@fashion_smoothie), 11,767 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashion_smoothie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.