Новая рекламная кампания Bottega Veneta наглядно показывает, как ощущается реальность, когда будильник стоит на шесть утра.
😁4❤🔥2💅2

Channel
@Ultima_Market
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
48,095subscribers
-18,077 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002001891176 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ultima_Market |
| Description | Редакция о моде, людях и событиях. Отбираем только то, что вдохновляет. https://bit.ly/3ZPO4qk |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ultima_Market |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 03:51 | 48,095 | -71 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:06 | 48,166 | -187 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 03:00 | 48,353 | -84 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 22:01 | 48,437 | -99 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:29 | 48,536 | -75 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:28 | 48,611 | -93 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:35 | 48,704 | -103 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:38 | 48,807 | -62 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:34 | 48,869 | -74 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 48,943 | -80 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 49,023 | -109 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 49,132 | -78 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 49,210 | -77 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 49,287 | -95 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:59 | 49,382 | -77 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 49,459 | -79 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 49,538 | -88 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 49,626 | -138 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 49,764 | -124 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 49,888 | first reading |
261 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 261 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 33,748 |
| Reactions total | 734 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 12:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,555 reactions across 253 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5278646640805192371 | 1,761 | 31.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,490 | 26.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1,065 | 19.2% | |
| 💅 | 326 | 5.87% | |
| 😁 | 318 | 5.72% | |
| 👏 | 285 | 5.13% | |
| 👍 | 125 | 2.25% | |
| 🥰 | 117 | 2.11% | |
| 🤔 | 68 | 1.22% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 259 of the 261 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,665 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 57 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Новая рекламная кампания Bottega Veneta наглядно показывает, как ощущается реальность, когда будильник стоит на шесть утра.
😁4❤🔥2💅2
Редакция Ultima Яндекс Маркета выбирает только те вещи, которые хочется рассматривать. Наш фаворит — ветровка J.Kim с объёмными цветочными элементами. Необычные «цветочки» — узнаваемый элемент бренда, вдохновлённый традицией Узбекистана заворачивать ценные вещи в тканевые узелки. Для основательницы марки Жени Ким они стали символом заботы. Тот момент, когда за красивой деталью скрывается целая история.
❤🔥6💅4🔥3🤔1
Разыгрываем 75 000 ₽ за лучшие фэшн-мемы! Редакция просто обожает мемы о моде и постоянно их придумывает. Судя по вашим реакциям, вам они нравятся не меньше. Поэтому мы решили предложить вам самим попробовать себя в роли мемологов. Объявляем конкурс на лучший модный мем! Условия простые: 1. Придумайте свой фэшн-мем и опубликуйте его в комментариях к этому посту. 2. Подпишитесь на канал «Редакция Ultima Яндекс Мар…
💅12❤🔥9👍2🔥2
Posted without readable text
😁8❤🔥7🤔2
Собрали подборку Balenciaga на стыке двух эстетик: дерзкой, провокационной моды Демны и более лаконичных, элегантных силуэтов Пьерпаоло Пиччоли. Тем временем у модного дома начинается новая глава: креативным директором официально назначена Мартин Роуз, которая ранее работала с Демной над мужской линией Balenciaga. Будем наблюдать, в каком направлении будет развиваться бренд.
❤🔥6💅2🔥1
Можно ли быть гениальным кутюрье, но не справиться с руководством модным домом? Пьерпаоло Пиччоли стал примером этого парадокса. Спустя чуть больше года после назначения в Balenciaga появилась информация о его уходе. Разбираемся, почему талант дизайнера не всегда гарантирует коммерческий успех.
❤🔥6🔥4💅3
Португальский Vogue намекает о наступлении понедельника. На самом деле ноябрьский выпуск посвящён искусству и его способности менять наше восприятие. На обложках — Александра Водопьянова и Вьет Даймонд, а также весь спектр эмоций, с которыми можно встретить начало рабочей недели.
❤🔥5🔥4😁4
Собрать стильный образ за пять минут — навык, которым хочется овладеть каждому. Редактор Вероника рассказала, какие вещи помогают ей не тратить много времени на сборы и чувствовать себя уверенно. Люблю осень за возможность вернуться к объёмным вещам. Сегодня мой выбор — коричневая куртка, простая белая майка и широкие джинсы в тон. Получается расслабленный, немного небрежный образ, в котором все вещи отлично сочетаю…
❤🔥6💅4🔥3
С приходом холодов ищем в гардеробе не только глубокие цвета, но и новые фактуры. Если кожаная одежда кажется чересчур дерзкой, на замену ей приходит уютный и мягкий вельвет. Нашли вельветовые брюки и пиджаки для всех, кто знает, что у природы нет плохой погоды. Бывает недостаточно тёплый аутфит. Всё — на Ultima Яндекс Маркете.
🔥6❤🔥1💅1
Как сделать цвет глаз ярче с помощью макияжа? Попробуйте eyemaxxing — технику, основанную на сочетании контрастных оттенков. Принцип не новый, но зумеры сделали его вновь популярным. В основе — классическая теория цвета. Чтобы подчеркнуть естественный оттенок радужки, надо выбирать цвета, расположенные напротив него на цветовом круге. Так, для голубых глаз подойдут тёплые оттенки: персиковый, терракотовый, медный и…
❤🔥17💅10🔥10
В рубрике Throwback Thursday вспоминаем архивные обложки Le Monde d’Hermès — собственного журнала модного дома, история которого началась ещё в 1973 году. Изначально журнал появился в Германии под названием Die Welt von Hermès, а спустя два года добрался до Франции. Его придумали как способ рассказать о целом мире Hermès — через искусство, фотографию, литературу, путешествия и ремесло. Журнал выходит до сих пор. Дв…
🔥6❤🔥2
А вы помните, что Канье Уэст не только мучает россиян новостями о своих потенциальных концертах, но ещё и выпускает одежду? В Лос-Анджелесе прошёл показ новой коллекции Yeezy Season 01. Последний полноценный показ бренда, кстати, состоялся аж в 2022 году. Ничего кардинально нового мы не увидели: всё тот же минимализм, объёмные силуэты, милитари и сдержанная цветовая палитра. Но, честно говоря, эстетика Yeezy всегда …
❤🔥4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 261 posts we hold for @Ultima_Market. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой парфюм выберете этой осенью?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Носим жилетки этой осенью?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Ultima_Market named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Редакция Ultima Яндекс Маркета” (@Ultima_Market), 48,095 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ultima_Market.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.