Честное медиа для родителей (18+). По вопросам рекламы: @dariya_gol
Наши проекты:
Клуб НЭН: https://club.n-e-n.ru
Школа НЭН: https://n-e-n.ru/school/
A+: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6736096c15601c23cb240797
56ac4e54-e076-4502-90ce-0055a25ca974
Created
28 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -131. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,638–22,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 05:16
22,698
+35
16 Sept 2026, 02:40
22,663
-16
14 Sept 2026, 08:59
22,679
-21
12 Sept 2026, 14:39
22,700
-14
10 Sept 2026, 14:00
22,714
-25
7 Sept 2026, 10:02
22,739
-15
4 Sept 2026, 12:18
22,754
-15
2 Sept 2026, 20:36
22,769
-3
1 Sept 2026, 15:38
22,772
-11
31 Aug 2026, 16:47
22,783
-3
30 Aug 2026, 16:13
22,786
-10
29 Aug 2026, 16:54
22,796
-4
28 Aug 2026, 19:14
22,800
-9
27 Aug 2026, 21:15
22,809
-4
27 Aug 2026, 00:42
22,813
+1
26 Aug 2026, 00:48
22,812
-9
24 Aug 2026, 23:03
22,821
+19
23 Aug 2026, 11:43
22,802
-6
21 Aug 2026, 21:28
22,808
-12
20 Aug 2026, 17:33
22,820
first reading
Engagement
193 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.73%
avg views ÷ 22,698 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 193 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
193 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
49,411
Reactions total
1,385
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 02:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,740
Videos
≈233
Links
≈10,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 06s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,867 reactions across 182 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,888
32.2%
😁
1,281
21.8%
💩
730
12.4%
🤯
370
6.31%
💔
334
5.69%
💯
322
5.49%
😱
269
4.58%
😢
226
3.85%
👏
193
3.29%
🔥
102
1.74%
custom 5472293242869405989
45
0.767%
🥰
42
0.716%
👀
22
0.375%
🤔
17
0.29%
custom 5192733456500542029
14
0.239%
😍
9
0.153%
custom 5471974650785323718
3
0.051%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 193 of the 193 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
101
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 193 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @net_etonorm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 193 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Она играет и гуляет с ним, когда бы я ни попросила, может забрать его в любое время на целый день, готова быть с ним ночь и укачивать, когда он просыпается и орет, она покупает ему развивашки, следит за малейшим изменением его самочувствия, жаждет научить (и пытается) его читать к трем годам и все в этом духе. Казалось бы — живи и радуйся, глупая, что у тебя есть такая помощь, большинство справляется самостоятельно …
В один далеко не прекрасный день 1998 года Кристал обернулась, оторвавшись от своих роз в саду, и увидела, как ее старшая дочь держит над перилами балкона младшего брата. На вопрос: «Что происходит?» — девочка ответила, что хотела убить малыша.
Эта история произошла более 20 лет назад и получила широкое освещение в США благодаря телепрограмме «48 часов». Тогда казалось, что она — об опасном и жестоком ребенке, усыно…
🥹 Расстояние не помеха: невеста и ее отец восемь месяцев репетировали сложный свадебный танец по видеосвязи
29-летняя Хлоя — профессиональная танцовщица. Она сама придумала танец и обучила отца: у них было восемь месяцев на подготовку. Девушка живет в Лондоне, а Эдди — в Галифаксе (Западный Йоркшир). Чтобы выучить движения, они репетировали по видеосвязи, а раз в месяц Хлоя приезжала к отцу, чтобы потренироваться вж…
Что делать, если в школе у ребенка пытаются отобрать телефон или деньги? Если незнакомый взрослый обращается к нему на улице? Если кто-то нарушает его границы, а рядом нет родителей?
Теперь такие ситуации можно разбирать вместе с ребенком — в новом шоу о детской безопасности
#новости_нэн
«Есть ощущение, что все кругом заставляют меня чувствовать вину. Отпросилась, потому что заболел ребенок? Подводишь ребят (хотя дома делаю больше работы, чем в офисе). Забыла надеть ребенку белую футболку и красные штаны на утренник? Что ты за мать! Ребенка рвет в садике? Тут двойная вина — перед руководителем и воспитателем. Сейчас я работаю над этим с психологом».
Истории читательниц НЭН, у которых часто болеют де…
Если вы узнали своего ребенка хотя бы в половине пунктов — поздравляем:
все только начинается.
Вместе с тоддлеровским «нет!» в родительском словаре появляется слово: «Перестань!»
В курсе НЭН «Вместо „Перестань немедленно“» разбираемся, чем заменить бесконечные запреты.
Еще два дня на него действует акция — при покупке курса дарим консультацию психолога «Балансити».
Подробности — по ссылке
Если вам повезет, то на родительском собрании вы спокойно отсидитесь, сдадите деньги на экскурсии, отмажетесь от участия в организации какого-нибудь мероприятия и пойдете домой. Везет так далеко не всем родителям.
Учитель может попросить вас задержаться и обсудить проблемы с учебой. Нормальной реакцией будет защищать своего ребенка от нападок. Но если учитель не пытается придраться к ребенку, а правда хочет помочь е…
Женщина родила двойню — мальчика и девочку. А потом выяснилось, что биологически младенцы не приходятся друг другу братом и сестрой. Этим случаем заинтересовались в суде
#новости_нэн
ААА! Смотрим первый трейлер сериала по «Гарри Поттеру» от HBO.
Премьера запланирована на 25 декабря. Ждете?
По этому волшебному поводу предлагаем вспомнить наши тексты о легендарной саге:
«Вскоре нам всем придется выбирать между тем, что правильно, и тем, что легко»: что мы узнали о жизни в темные времена благодаря Гарри Поттеру
Как хорошо вы помните первый фильм о Гарри Поттере? Тест для самых внимательных
Не п…
Почему анализы на гормоны могут быть нормальными, от МГТ не обязательно толстеют и что на самом деле известно о раке, тромбах, сексе и внезапной ненависти ко всем вокруг.
Большой гид по перименопаузе и МГТ
#ликбез_нэн
❤4😁2💩1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @net_etonorm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@net_etonorm edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы бы стали переживать из-за того, что ваш подросток ни с кем не встречается?
Не встречается — и слава богу!77%
Это повод для беспокойства25%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мел @melfm · 52,727 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
doctor_annamama @doctor_annamama · 82,960 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Заметки детского врача @DrButriy · 137,931 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Федиатрия @fediatrix · 54,239 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Рецепты Лайфхакера @lh_eda · 38,747 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Шура, выручай! @shura_help · 34,434 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
BUNGLY | БАНГЛИ @bungly_official · 35,176 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 3 September 2026
Людмила Петрановская @lpetranovskaya · 168,368 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Рediatric family | Громовы @pediatricfamily · 38,301 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
DocDeti & DocMed @docdeti_docmed · 63,234 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
Доктор Владислав Ченчак @glavmamarf · 84,006 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
Polina for baby @polinaforbaby · 48,799 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Василиса Бутусова @stillvasilisa · 24,637 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Занудная педиатрия — Роман Шиян @drshnr · 37,118 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Дневник доктора Белолипецкой @dr_belolipetskaia · 44,734 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
ninavaccina @ninavaccina · 89,921 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нет, это нормально” (@net_etonorm), 22,698 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/net_etonorm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
