📢И снова ищем кормящих мам с новорожденными в Питере! Зачем? Я руковожу школой по грудному вскармливанию для педиатров. В моих интересах — наглядно показать и обучить коллег техникам прикладывания и докорма у груди, взаимодействию с кормящими мамами. Поэтому если: ✅Вы из Санкт-Петербурга ✅Вашему малышу меньше 1,5 месяцев ✅У вас есть проблемы и вопросы с гв и прикладыванием (не обязательно) ✅Вы сможете приехать к на…

Channel
Рediatric family | Громовы
@pediatricfamily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,053subscribers
-439 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001953412959 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pediatricfamily |
| Description | Александр и Вероника Громовы - педиатры о современной медицине, жизни врачей и родительстве. Сайт: https://pediatricfamily.ru ВК: https://vk.com/pediatricfamily Max: https://max.ru/pediatricfamily Ркн:https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6791a27bee896061c9c416f4 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pediatricfamily |
Topic
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:09 | 38,053 | -6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:50 | 38,059 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:59 | 38,060 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:41 | 38,062 | +24 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:09 | 38,038 | +9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:49 | 38,029 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:11 | 38,032 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 38,033 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:09 | 38,039 | -16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 38,055 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 38,072 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:26 | 38,075 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 38,088 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 38,096 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 38,116 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 38,118 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:50 | 38,123 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 38,132 | -11 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:04 | 38,143 | +9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:44 | 38,134 | first reading |
Engagement
214 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.78%
- avg views ÷ 38,053 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,720
- 66 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.54%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 66
- of 214 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 214 (3 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 245,548 |
| Reactions total | 6,233 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,720
- Videos
- ≈853
- Links
- ≈1,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 47m 32s
- Average length
- 1m 03s
Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,264 reactions across 210 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12,338 | 67.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1,873 | 10.3% | |
| 🤣 | 1,000 | 5.48% | |
| 👍 | 653 | 3.58% | |
| 💯 | 601 | 3.29% | |
| 😍 | 529 | 2.90% | |
| 🥰 | 464 | 2.54% | |
| 🤝 | 251 | 1.37% | |
| ❤🔥 | 120 | 0.657% | |
| 🤪 | 110 | 0.602% | |
| 🕊 | 86 | 0.471% | |
| ✍ | 69 | 0.378% | |
| 💘 | 34 | 0.186% | |
| ⚡ | 31 | 0.17% | |
| 🐳 | 29 | 0.159% | |
| custom 5343904030303201427 | 21 | 0.115% | |
| 🤩 | 17 | 0.093% | |
| 🦄 | 14 | 0.077% | |
| 🆒 | 13 | 0.071% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 0.027% | |
| 2 further kinds | 6 | 0.033% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 214 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 214 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pediatricfamily. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 214 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.40%
- 3 of 214 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 3
- posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 3,560
- over 3 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 3,730
- over 211 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VSb5yBParv | 1 | 4 November 2026 | 4 November 2026 |
| 2VtzqxUUUNG | 1 | 24 September 2026 | 24 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFJigohs | 1 | 31 August 2026 | 31 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 66 posts held from the last 30 days (15.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Видите, как это работает?❤ Мы убираем ту самую привычку «сосать палец», работаем с причиной и другими способами саморегуляции. На лекции мы как раз разбираем: 🤩Почему возникают такие «привычки» 🤩Как мягко помочь ребенку от них отказаться 🤩Если есть подобная проблема с пустышкой - тоже можно смело слушать! Приходите слушать 💗
❤26👍5😍4🤝1custom 53439040303032014271
Конец нашего гв. Мыслей и чувств очень много, неожиданно для самой меня. Как чуть улягутся чувства - запишу вам видео об этом всём
❤161💘23😍17🕊16🥰2
🤩 У вас в год будет школьник, если малыш будет прибавлять по килограмму каждый месяц! 📎Я не знаю, откуда взялось это мнение, что ребёнок в первый год жизни, да и в последующие, должен прибавлять по килограмму. В первый месяц, второй — это ещё допустимо и хорошо, но дальше странно. В любом случае нам важна не конкретная цифра в какой-то месяц, а динамика веса за всё время. Поэтому скачивайте любые приложения с треке…
❤33🔥10😍3
🙂 Пациенты! Если вы когда либо были у нас на приемах, сделайте доброе и полезное для нас дело - оставьте отзыв. Это очень поможет и нам, и клинике развиваться дальше. Оставить отзыв можно на портале «НаПоправку» и «ПроДокторов». 🌼Вероника Игоревна НаПоправку ПроДокторов ⭐Александр Алексеевич НаПоправку ПроДокторов 🙏
❤21
Дамы! Лактация работает так, что даже после завершения гв молоко есть в груди. Спустя около 40 дней с момента последнего прикладывания организм снижает выработку молока, но по каплям оно может выделяться годами после нажатия на грудь. И даже после - теоретически, вы можете начать лактировать даже если у вас нет ребёнка. А если он появится, то лактация просто продолжится.
❤62👍8✍3🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤24
Уже ждёте этот прекрасный сезон, когда с детьми невозможно выйти на улицу?😪 У нас в СПб, к сожалению , уже бывает такая погода, что на прогулку не сходишь. В такие дни мы обычно утоляем потребность в двигательной активности дома! И как педиатр хочу напомнить: физическая активность — это не обязательно спортивные секции или двухчасовые прогулки. Танцами, зарядкой, подвижными играми и даже небольшими тренировками мож…
❤30🔥5💯1
Начался сезон аллергии, экземы. Мама что-то съела — сухой кожи! Сейчас каждый второй ребёнок с этими пятнами. Это не массовая аллергия, это начало атопического сезона и холодов с пониженной влажностью. Что мы можем сделать: 🤩увлажнять помещения; 🤩увлажнять кожу; 🤩уехать на юг. Выбираем любые эмоленты, которые нравятся и дают эффект. Мажем сухую кожу два раза в день (утром и вечером после купания). Для продвинутых п…
❤76👍9😍2🕊1
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 👻Полезные посты: 🤩Тактика действия при ОКИ 🤩Вакцинация от гриппа 🤩Функциональные запоры 🤩Ребенок не пьет воду 🤩Популярные мифы о продуктах 🤩Теряет сознание, язык не держим 🤩Зубы или ОРВИ 🤩Что можно и нельзя детям есть 🤩Детская аптечка 🤩Поствакцинальная реакция 🤩Новые клинические рекомендации по ОРВИ 🤩Советы из детства 🤩Акне или аллергия 🤩Ответы на вопросы про стул детей 🚩Подборка ОРВИ 🔥Завершение …
❤21
Отлучение от груди или завершение гв? Эта концепция перевернет ваше представление о процессе
🔥29❤24👍9
Пропали на выходные, а все потому что у нас был корпоратив клиники, угадайте в каком стиле. На самом деле мы очень классные доктора, можете записываться к любому, доверяем всем и своих пациентов, и своих детей 💭
🔥34❤22🥰6
Showing the 12 most recent of 214 posts we hold for @pediatricfamily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@pediatricfamily edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @pediatricfamily as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 12 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ждёте?
- О да34%
- Нет6%
- Не ходим ещё в сад60%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как у вас?
- Убираюсь 45 раз в день39%
- Преисполнился и живу в хаосе31%
- Убираюсь один раз в финале39%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@herdimmunity · 5,3524 postsДалай-мама
@veronika_dalai_mama · 2,0204 postsPediatric family club| ИНФО
@pediatricfamilyclub · 1,7752 postsваша подружка педиатр | Тимошенко Анастасия
@artemenkodoc · 4621 postБратья Чистовы - уборка квартир, домов и помещений
@cleanbros · 5591 postDOC.POPOVKIN’ы
@docpopovkina · 91,3671 postДоктор Пряник
@doctor_pryanik · 2,0521 postMamadoc
@mamadocpro · 4,0781 postmicrodoc: педиатрия и гв
@microdoc_alena · 3311 postninavaccina
@ninavaccina · 90,3461 postДышим спокойно | Педиатрия | Анастасия Нистарова
@pediatriciannistarova · 4331 postРадуга слов | Логопедический центр
@radugaslov_logo · 941 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@docpopovkina · 91,367#1
@legko_v_dekrete · 30,910#2
@svetlana_ortoped · 7,114#3
@docdeti_docmed · 62,962#4
@be_a_mom · 6,384#5
@mamadocpro · 4,078#6
@polinaforbaby · 48,713#7
@mariakakdelababy · 33,491#8
@childrentoeat · 7,536#9
@julsymama · 4,077#10
@doctor_pryanik · 2,052#11
@mamblogDoctorSergeeva · 12,491#12
@fominclinickids_spb · 633#13
@mama_bez_drama · 9,721#14
@drsaliseee · 5,704#15
@mamadontpanic · 3,241#16
@polyaklinika · 5,483#17
@shura_help · 34,562#18
@catalogmaterinstva · 9,989#19
@mamochkaznaet · 2,761#20
@pediatr_kovalenko · 6,049#21
@vkusnayaLiza · 10,513#22
@massagist_novokrinitskii · 87,864#23
@docdocdasha · 2,282#24
@pediatriadocmaschool · 9,801#25
@Docma_ru · 41,715#26
@fulltime_mama · 8,809#27
@doctor_marina_popova_blog · 3,378#28
@pediatr_kozyreva · 11,382#29
@kseniyshhh · 4,551#30
@psypositiveparenting · 2,923#31
@kolybel_mukhomora · 10,712#32
@urokids · 8,517#33
@ne_tolko_mami · 8,773#34
@slavnye_rody · 23,469#35
@momknutaya · 6,822#36
@maminoschastyje · 9,736#37
@pomoshnik_pediatra · 23,739#38
@proseccomame · 9,151#39
@YaPonedelnik · 4,189#40
@mommyclub_ru · 5,227#41
@amoms · 11,004#42
@doc_erofeeva · 2,974#43
@tanyalare_son · 6,150#44
@mjuli3 · 8,121#45
@zametki_molodoj_mamy · 8,714#46
@spimalysh · 16,616#47
@maminipokupki · 2,829#48
@nadezhdiinaa · 11,780#49
@net_etonorm · 23,159#50
@Mrs_BearJu · 12,005#51
@gorod_detey · 6,825#52
@doctorklimova · 1,340#53
@greenlearn_new · 7,615#54
@nakormi_menya · 17,609#55
@valentinapaevskaya · 228,880#56
@DrButriy · 137,621#57
@ninavaccina · 90,346#58
@mamareshaet · 560#59
@drshnr · 37,029#60
@alex_mixay · 3,089#61
@mamarasskazhet · 18,355#62
@checnodeti · 9,228#63
@julia_i_timosha · 11,090#64
@immunobee1 · 103,858#65
@lumicube · 7,688#66
@memoshnaja · 8,160#67
@mamochkavteme · 7,676#68
@sveta_v_dekrete · 17,150#69
@vam_na_vyrost · 6,193#70
@baby_outfitt · 8,775#71
@nastasino_shchaste · 6,451#72
@romashkarom · 18,812#73
@belik_kv · 6,255#74
@na_perevospitanii · 7,658#75
@samoprikormisha · 12,749#76
@streletskids · 48,376#77
@formimistyle · 30,897#78
@lamama_gv · 7,188#79
@TravelWithBabyBoy · 8,007#80
@momsquarter · 11,804#81
@asya_and_lizavetochka · 13,497#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@legko_v_dekrete · 30,910
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
@docpopovkina · 91,367
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
@polinaforbaby · 48,713
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@docdeti_docmed · 62,962
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@doctor_dmolodoy · 61,442
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
@massagist_novokrinitskii · 87,864
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
@malysh_kyshaet · 22,034
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
@dr_belolipetskaia · 44,222
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@shura_help · 34,562
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
@glavmamarf · 85,939
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
@anyclass_supermama · 55,718
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@slavnye_rody · 23,469
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
@irovalife · 111,201
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@positivepsychology1 · 54,821
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
@novokrinitskii_otgoda · 33,047
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
@doctor_annamama · 82,330
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@pomoshnik_pediatra · 23,739
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
@vkysnayatarelochka · 25,399
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
@DrButriy · 137,621
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@Docma_ru · 41,715
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 29 August 2026
@ninavaccina · 90,346
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
@drshnr · 37,029
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
@pediatrhelp · 19,285
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рediatric family | Громовы” (@pediatricfamily), 38,053 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pediatricfamily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.