Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Moneyhack

@moneyhack

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

19,517subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001055985177
TypeChannel
Username@moneyhack
DescriptionРеклама и сотрудничество - @AlexaKrasnova https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=676296978e552d6b54ea20c8&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created15 May 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moneyhack

Growth

19,51719,54719,5325 August 2026 — 19,546 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,546 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,547 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,542 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,536 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,534 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,536 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,525 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,517 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,513–19,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:5419,517-8
11 Aug 2026, 18:5219,525-11
10 Aug 2026, 19:3519,536+2
9 Aug 2026, 18:1819,534-2
8 Aug 2026, 17:3619,536-6
7 Aug 2026, 16:5019,542-5
6 Aug 2026, 17:2019,547+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:0719,546no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:2119,546first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 19,517 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,860
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.746%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held21 (7 May 202611 August 2026)
Views total8,580
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,720
Videos
27
Links
3,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

935 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24526.2%
🔥20922.4%
❤‍🔥717.59%
😭717.59%
💔616.52%
👏576.10%
👀495.24%
😁475.03%
🌚384.06%
🍾343.64%
🤔171.82%
💯161.71%
🦄90.963%
🌭50.535%
🍓40.428%
👾20.214%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 935reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 21 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moneyhack. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,250 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Telegram запустил офлайн-челлендж с наградой 100 USDT Telegram запустил первый в истории мессенджера офлайн-челлендж — «Модерация в реальной жизни»: пользователям предлагают заработать на уборке общественных территорий. Объявление появилось в официальном аккаунте Telegram в соцсети X утром 11 августа. Что нужно делать Чтобы принять участие, нужно выбрать место, которое требует уборки: парк, газон или другую общест

❤‍🔥10🌚8👀2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC≈2,900 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В России официально легализовали криптовалюту С 1 сентября в России вступят в силу новые правила регулирования криптовалют. Вот основные моменты. 🔘Криптовалюта останется только инвестиционным инструментом — использовать её для оплаты товаров и услуг по-прежнему запрещено. 🔘Вся прибыль от операций с криптой будет облагаться налогом по ставке от 13%. 🔘Чтобы инвестировать в крипту, человеку придётся пройти специаль

😁6😭5🌭1

21 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC≈4,430 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

3 книги для летнего чтения нашего Ленивого книжного клуба Ну что, ваш ленивый ведущий Ленивого книжного клуба наконец-то собрался с силами. Ловите 3 книжки, которые классно читать летом. 1. «Завет воды» Абрахама Вергезе Это большой колониальный роман, действие которого происходит в Индии. Он рассказывает про нескольких главных героев из разных эпох, в конце концов их истории сведутся в одну, как и положено в хоро

30🌚1

8 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC≈4,740 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Узнайте, насколько важным вас считает ии Подруга прислала прикольный сервис In Weight, в котором можно посмотреть, насколько часто ии использует созданную вами (или о вас) информацию для своих ответов. Как это работает Своё имя можно вбить на сайте на разных языках, в том числе на русском. Алгоритм направляет запрос последним версиям Grok, Gemini, GPT от OpenAI, Claude, Llama, GLM и Qwen. По итогам группируется т

8😁7

2 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC≈4,860 views19 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Схема, чтобы понять почему вы не зарабатываете столько, сколько хотите Спокойно, тут не будет советов медитировать на деньги или что там ещё советуют среды из Инсты. Вы знаете, я строгий сторонник доказательных методов и манихаков. Но они работают тогда, когда решают правильную задачу. Если цель - сэкономить, нужны одни инструменты. Если цель - зарабатывать больше, почти всегда есть две составляющие: организационн

11🌭3👏3😁2

26 Jun 2026, 08:28 UTC≈5,090 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кстати, этот пост мне отредактировал Gemini. Заметно?

💯13🌚9🔥71

26 Jun 2026, 08:27 UTC≈4,870 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Почему «тарелочницы» — это признак кризиса в экономике Недавно наткнулась в Threads на грустную мысль, с которой полностью согласна. Все эти бесконечные сетевые войны вокруг «тарелочниц», споры из-за цены салата и чашки кофе на первом свидании — это не только про измельчание мужчин или алчных женщин. Это маркер того, в каком глубоком кризисе оказалась экономика. Вспомните, как еще лет пять-шесть назад индустрия ю

💔59😭24👏1511🌚7🔥3👾2❤‍🔥1

23 Jun 2026, 11:04 UTC≈4,310 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тинькофф выкатил тайное приложение в App Store Вот ссылка из их официального пуша https://apps.apple.com/ru/app/toastmas/id6774629936 Скачивайте, пока не удалили. А то Тинькофф постоянно шлет пуши, что текущая версия приложения устарела @Moneyhack

1🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 11:57 UTC≈4,320 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Спальный лайфхак для тех, кто снимает жильё 🛌 Недавно мы с семьей переехали в новую съемную квартиру. И в ней оказался очень жесткий матрас на кровати. Несколько месяцев я помучилась, но когда мои мышцы сказали, что больше так не могут и у меня защемилась шея, встал вопрос - что делать. Покупать матрас в сьемное жильё - вариант не очень. Его сложно перевозить, сложно продать на виоричке, да и вообще жизнь стала слиш

38🤔7👏4

19 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC≈4,050 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Интересная документалка про то, что мешает нам осуществлять мечты 💭 Это история человека, который обнаружил, что уже много лет живёт по одному и тому же сценарию. Казалось бы, жизнь наполнена делами, проектами и событиями. Но главное остаётся неизменным: самые важные мечты и цели почему-то всё время оказываются где-то впереди. Один разговор помогает ему взглянуть на ситуацию по-новому. Так начинается годовой экспе

18

19 Jun 2026, 06:20 UTC≈3,730 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кто выиграет Чемпионат мира по футболу? Прогнозы экономистов ⚽️ Ну как вы, котики? Остается время смотреть футбол? У меня пока нет, но зато я нашла интересные прогнозы по теме. Итак, кто станет Чемпионом? Версия экономистов. 1. Goldman Sachs ➔ 🇪🇸 Испания Экономисты из Goldman Sachs запустили свою традиционную статистическую модель, основанную на исторических данных матчей и результативности игроков. Она показала,

😁11🔥61

9 Jun 2026, 06:02 UTC≈4,490 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Лайфхак: как купить авиабилеты дешевле Наткнулась на новый-старый тренд, как более выгодны купить билеты. Оказывается в России последнюю пару лет происходит ренессанс чартеров. И купить место в на такой рейс можно без общения с турагентами. Существуют специализированные биржи, где можно купить остатки мест на чартеры в Турцию, Египет и Таиланд. Это часто выходит в 1,5–2 раза дешевле регулярной перевозки. Вот какие

17🔥14💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @moneyhack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 May 2026, 10:27 UTCAnonymous Poll1,100 voters approx.

Вы верите, что вклады могут заморозить?

  1. Да15%
  2. Нет, это уже слишком38%
  3. Пока нет, но допускаю, что в будущем такое возможно49%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 48,601 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Moneyhack” (@moneyhack), 19,517 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moneyhack.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.